Reply to "Comment on 'Near-Surface Location, Geometry, and Velocities of the Santa Monica Fault Zone, Los Angeles, California' by R. D. Catchings, G. Gandhok, M. R. Goldman, D. Okaya, M. J. Rymer, and G. W. Bawden" by T. L. Pratt and J. F. Dolan

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (5A) ◽  
pp. 2338-2347
Author(s):  
R. D. Catchings ◽  
M. J. Rymer ◽  
M. R. Goldman ◽  
G. Gandhok ◽  
G. W. Bawden
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Fault Zone ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Santa Monica ◽  
Surface Location

Near-Surface Location, Geometry, and Velocities of the Santa Monica Fault Zone, Los Angeles, California

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Catchings ◽  
G. Gandhok ◽  
M. R. Goldman ◽  
D. Okaya ◽  
M. J. Rymer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Fault Zone ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Santa Monica ◽  
Surface Location

FAULT-ZONE EXPLORATION IN HIGHLY URBANIZED SETTINGS USING GUIDED WAVES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE RAYMOND FAULT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Catchings ◽  
◽  
Janis L. Hernandez ◽  
Robert R. Sickler ◽  
M.R. Goldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Fault Zone ◽  
Guided Waves

scholarly journals Signature of fault zone deformation in near-surface soil visible in shear wave seismic reflections

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1074-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranajit Ghose ◽  
Joao Carvalho ◽  
Afonso Loureiro
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Fault Zone ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Seismic Reflections ◽  
Zone Deformation

scholarly journals Fault Zone Guided Wave generation on the locked, late interseismic Alpine Fault, New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
JD Eccles ◽  
AK Gulley ◽  
PE Malin ◽  
CM Boese ◽  
John Townend ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Plate Boundary ◽  
Guided Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Catchment Scale ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Low Velocity Zone ◽  
Alpine Fault ◽  
Velocity Zone

© 2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. Fault Zone Guided Waves (FZGWs) have been observed for the first time within New Zealand's transpressional continental plate boundary, the Alpine Fault, which is late in its typical seismic cycle. Ongoing study of these phases provides the opportunity to monitor interseismic conditions in the fault zone. Distinctive dispersive seismic codas (~7-35Hz) have been recorded on shallow borehole seismometers installed within 20m of the principal slip zone. Near the central Alpine Fault, known for low background seismicity, FZGW-generating microseismic events are located beyond the catchment-scale partitioning of the fault indicating lateral connectivity of the low-velocity zone immediately below the near-surface segmentation. Initial modeling of the low-velocity zone indicates a waveguide width of 60-200m with a 10-40% reduction in S wave velocity, similar to that inferred for the fault core of other mature plate boundary faults such as the San Andreas and North Anatolian Faults.

Do active faults’ clay mineral compositions affect whether earthquake ruptures they host will displace the surface?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selina S. Fenske ◽  
Virginia G. Toy ◽  
Bernhard Schuck ◽  
Anja M. Schleicher ◽  
Klaus Reicherter
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Clay Mineral ◽  
Active Faults ◽  
Surface Displacement ◽  
Surface Rupture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Ground Shaking ◽  
Physical Measurements ◽  
Surface Displacements ◽  
Earthquake Ruptures

<p>The tectonophysical paradigm that earthquake ruptures should not start, or easily propagate into, the shallowest few kilometers of Earth’s crust makes it difficult to understand why damaging surface displacements have occurred during historic events. The paradigm is supported by decades of analyses demonstrating that near the surface, most major fault zones are composed of clay minerals – particularly extraordinarily weak smectites – which most laboratory physical measurements suggest should prevent surface rupture if present. Recent studies of New Zealand’s Alpine Fault Zone (AFZ) demonstrate smectites are absent from some near surface fault outcrops, which may explain why this fault was able to offset the surface locally in past events. The absence of smectites in places within the AFZ can be attributed to locally exceptionally high geothermal gradients related to circulation of meteoric (surface-derived) water into the fault zone, driven by significant topographic gradients. The record of surface rupture of the AFZ is heterogeneous, and no one has yet systematically examined the distribution of segments devoid of evidence for recent displacement. There are significant implications for seismic hazard, which comprises both surface displacements and ground shaking with intensity related to the area of fault plane that ruptures (which will be reduced if ruptures do not reach the surface).  We will present results of new rigorous XRD clay mineral analyses of AFZ principal slip zone gouges that indicate where smectites are present, and consider if these display systematic relationships to surface displacement records. We also plan to apply the same methodology to the Carboneras Fault Zone in Spain, and the infrequent Holocene-active faults in Western Germany.</p>

The Tejon Pass earthquake of October 22, 1916

1917 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
John Casper Branner
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Fault Zone ◽  
Fault Line ◽  
The South ◽  
Epicentral Area ◽  
The North ◽  
San Andreas ◽  
North Side ◽  
To Come

Summary The area over which the shock was felt by persons at rest was 27,000 square miles or more, extending from Fresno on the north to San Diego on the south, and from Mojave to the coast. The epicenter seems to have been near the summit of the Tejon Pass, where the intensity reached VII or a little more, of the Rossi-Forel scale. At many places the shock was preceded by a pronounced roar like thunder or a high wind. Wherever the direction of the sound was noted it appeared to come from the epicentral area. The region is too thinly populated and our data are too meager to enable us to outline the area of high intensity with confidence, but the following facts seem to be fairly well established: The shock or shocks were produced by movement on the fault line that passes through the Tejon Pass and follows thence east-southeast along the axes of Leonas Valley and Anaverde Valley and northwestward through Cuddy Canyon and Cuddy Valley. The topographic evidence of the fault in the Tejon Pass is very pronounced, but there is topographic evidence of another fault that branches off from the Tejon Pass fault about a mile and a half northwest of Tejon Pass and runs east-northeast from the northwest corner of Los Angeles county, passing along the north side of Castac Lake. The depression occupied by Castac Lake seems to have been formed by a downthrow on the south side of this fault. It has been supposed that the fault through Tejon Pass was a southward prolongation of the San Andreas fault near San Francisco. The identity of these faults is far from being evident. The topography, the distribution of earthquake shocks, and the method of fracture along the fault zones all suggest a series of overlapping faults rather than one continuous fault. Mr. Hamlin says on this subject: “This fault is not a long continuous fracture, but rather a fault zone with numerous branches. Dropped blocks are not uncommon along this zone, some being a mile or more wide and twice as long.” The forms of the isoseismals of this particular earthquake, however, suggest definite relations to this fault zone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document