Nonlinear Site Response Effects on the Standard Deviations of Predicted Ground Motions

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1288-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Al Atik ◽  
N. Abrahamson
Keyword(s):  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Standard Deviations

Pitfalls of Deterministic Application of Nonlinear Site Factors in Probabilistic Assessment of Ground Motions

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Goulet ◽  
Jonathan P. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Site Effects ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Site Conditions ◽  
Return Periods ◽  
Site Factors ◽  
Intensity Measures ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Rock And Soil

It is common for ground motions to be estimated using a combination of probabilistic and deterministic procedures. Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHA) are performed to estimate intensity measures ( IMs) for reference site conditions (usually rock). This is followed by a deterministic modification of the rock IMs to account for site effects, typically using site factors from the literature or seismic codes. We demonstrate for two California sites and three site conditions that the deterministic application of nonlinear site factors underestimates ground motions evaluated probabilistically for return periods of engineering interest. Reasons for this misfit include different standard deviation terms for rock and soil sites, different controlling earthquakes, and overestimation of the nonlinear component of the site response in the deterministic procedure. This problem is solved using site-specific PSHA with appropriate consideration of nonlinear site response, within the hazard integral.

Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Abrahamson ◽  
Gail Atkinson ◽  
David Boore ◽  
Yousef Bozorgnia ◽  
Kenneth Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Site Response ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sediment Depth ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Crustal Earthquakes ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Soil Sediment ◽  
Active Tectonic ◽  
Standard Deviations

The data sets, model parameterizations, and results from the five NGA models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions are compared. A key difference in the data sets is the inclusion or exclusion of aftershocks. A comparison of the median spectral values for strike-slip earthquakes shows that they are within a factor of 1.5 for magnitudes between 6.0 and 7.0 for distances less than 100 km. The differences increase to a factor of 2 for M5 and M8 earthquakes, for buried ruptures, and for distances greater than 100 km. For soil sites, the differences in the modeling of soil/sediment depth effects increase the range in the median long-period spectral values for M7 strike-slip earthquakes to a factor of 3. The five models have similar standard deviations for M6.5-M7.5 earthquakes for rock sites and for soil sites at distances greater than 50 km. Differences in the standard deviations of up to 0.2 natural log units for moderate magnitudes at all distances and for large magnitudes at short distances result from the treatment of the magnitude dependence and the effects of nonlinear site response on the standard deviation.

Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Abrahamson ◽  
Walter Silva
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Hanging Wall ◽  
Site Location ◽  
Crustal Earthquakes ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Improved Model

Empirical ground-motion models for the rotation-independent average horizontal component from shallow crustal earthquakes are derived using the PEER NGA database. The model is applicable to magnitudes 5–8.5, distances 0–200 km, and spectral periods of 0–10 sec. In place of generic site categories (soil and rock), the site is parameterized by average shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m ( VS30) and the depth to engineering rock (depth to VS=1000 m/s). In addition to magnitude and style-of-faulting, the source term is also dependent on the depth to top-of-rupture: for the same magnitude and rupture distance, buried ruptures lead to larger short-period ground motions than surface ruptures. The hanging-wall effect is included with an improved model that varies smoothly as a function of the source properties (M, dip, depth), and the site location. The standard deviation is magnitude dependent with smaller magnitudes leading to larger standard deviations. The short-period standard deviation model for soil sites is also distant-dependent due to nonlinear site response, with smaller standard deviations at short distances.

Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Vertical Ground Motion Component Based on the NGA-W2 Database

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 499-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep Gülerce ◽  
Ronnie Kamai ◽  
Norman A. Abrahamson ◽  
Walter J. Silva
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Motion Models ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Vertical Ground Motion ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Ground Motion Models

Empirical ground motion models for the vertical component from shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using the PEER NGA-West2 database. The model is applicable to magnitudes 3.0–8.0, distances of 0–300 km, and spectral periods of 0–10 s. The model input parameters are the same as used by Abrahamson et al. (2014) except that the nonlinear site response and depth to bedrock effects are evaluated but found to be insignificant. Regional differences in large distance attenuation and site amplification scaling between California, Japan, China, Taiwan, Italy, and the Middle East are included. Scaling for the hanging-wall effect is incorporated using the constraints from numerical simulations by Donahue and Abrahamson (2014) . The standard deviation is magnitude dependent with smaller magnitudes leading to larger standard deviations at short periods but smaller standard deviations at long periods. The vertical ground motion model developed in this study can be paired with the horizontal component model proposed by Abrahamson et al. (2014) to produce a V/H ratio. For applications where the horizontal spectrum is derived from the weighted average of several horizontal ground motion models, a V/H model derived directly from the V/H data (such as Gülerce and Abrahamson 2011 ) should be preferred.

scholarly journals Developing a model for the prediction of ground motions due to earthquakes in the Groningen gas field

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. s203-s213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian J. Bommer ◽  
Bernard Dost ◽  
Benjamin Edwards ◽  
Pauline P. Kruiver ◽  
Michail Ntinalexis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Essential Element ◽  
Mitigation Measures ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Groningen Gas Field

AbstractMajor efforts are being undertaken to quantify seismic hazard and risk due to production-induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field as the basis for rational decision-making about mitigation measures. An essential element is a model to estimate surface ground motions expected at any location for each earthquake originating within the gas reservoir. Taking advantage of the excellent geological and geophysical characterisation of the field and a growing database of ground-motion recordings, models have been developed for predicting response spectral accelerations, peak ground velocity and ground-motion durations for a wide range of magnitudes. The models reflect the unique source and travel path characteristics of the Groningen earthquakes, and account for the inevitable uncertainty in extrapolating from the small observed magnitudes to potential larger events. The predictions of ground-motion amplitudes include the effects of nonlinear site response of the relatively soft near-surface deposits throughout the field.

scholarly journals Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendon A. Bradley ◽  
Misko Cubrinovski
Keyword(s):  
Surface Waves ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Critical Examination ◽  
Acceleration Response ◽  
Strong Ground Motions ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Acceleration Response Spectra ◽  
Strong Ground

This manuscript provides a critical examination of the ground motions recorded in the near-source region resulting from the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Particular attention is given to reconciling the observed spatial distribution of ground motions in terms of physical phenomena related to source, path and site effects. The large number of near-source observed strong ground motions show clear evidence of: forward-directivity, basin generated surface waves, liquefaction and other significant nonlinear site response. The pseudo-acceleration response spectra (SA) amplitudes and significant duration of strong motions agree well with empirical prediction models, except at long vibration periods where the influence of basin-generated surface waves and nonlinear site response are significant and not adequately accounted for in empirical SA models. Pseudo-acceleration response spectra are also compared with those observed in the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake and routine design response spectra used in order to emphasise the amplitude of ground shaking and elucidate the importance of local geotechnical characteristics on surface ground motions. The characteristics of the observed vertical component accelerations are shown to be strongly dependent on source-to-site distance and are comparable with those from the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake, implying the large amplitudes observed are simply a result of many observations at close distances rather than a peculiar source effect.

scholarly journals Peak ground motions and characteristics of nonlinear site response during the 2018 Mw 6.6 Hokkaido eastern Iburi earthquake

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yadab P. Dhakal ◽  
Takashi Kunugi ◽  
Takeshi Kimura ◽  
Wataru Suzuki ◽  
Shin Aoi
Keyword(s):  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response

Simulation-based site amplification model for shallow bedrock sites in Korea

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302098198
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aaqib ◽  
Duhee Park ◽  
Muhammad Bilal Adeel ◽  
Youssef M A Hashash ◽  
Okan Ilhan
Keyword(s):  
Linear Models ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Nonlinear Component ◽  
Nonlinear Site Response ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Linear And Nonlinear ◽  
Input Motion ◽  
Nonlinear Components

A new simulation-based site amplification model for shallow sites with thickness less than 30 m in Korea is developed. The site amplification model consists of linear and nonlinear components that are developed from one-dimensional linear and nonlinear site response analyses. A suite of measured shear wave velocity profiles is used to develop corresponding randomized profiles. A VS30 scaled linear amplification model and a model dependent on both VS30 and site period are developed. The proposed linear models compare well with the amplification equations developed for the western United States (WUS) at short periods but show a distinct curved bump between 0.1 and 0.5 s that corresponds to the range of site natural periods of shallow sites. The response at periods longer than 0.5 s is demonstrated to be lower than those of the WUS models. The functional form widely used in both WUS and central and eastern North America (CENA), for the nonlinear component of the site amplification model, is employed in this study. The slope of the proposed nonlinear component with respect to the input motion intensity is demonstrated to be higher than those of both the WUS and CENA models, particularly for soft sites with VS30 < 300 m/s and at periods shorter than 0.2 s. The nonlinear component deviates from the models for generic sites even at low ground motion intensities. The comparisons highlight the uniqueness of the amplification characteristics of shallow sites that a generic site amplification model is unable to capture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document