Coulomb Stress Transfer and Tectonic Loading Preceding the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1662-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Bufe
Keyword(s):  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Denali Fault ◽  
Tectonic Loading

scholarly journals Coulomb stress transfer and fault interaction over millennia on non-planar active normal faults: the Mw 6.5–5.0 seismic sequence of 2016–2017, central Italy

2017 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 1206-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe K. Mildon ◽  
Gerald P. Roberts ◽  
Joanna P. Faure Walker ◽  
Francesco Iezzi
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Historical Record ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Fault Interaction ◽  
Slip Rates ◽  
Stress Changes

Abstract In order to investigate the importance of including strike-variable geometry and the knowledge of historical and palaeoseismic earthquakes when modelling static Coulomb stress transfer and rupture propagation, we have examined the August–October 2016 A.D. and January 2017 A.D. central Apennines seismic sequence (Mw 6.0, 5.9, 6.5 in 2016 A.D. (INGV) and Mw 5.1, 5.5, 5.4, 5.0 in 2017 A.D. (INGV)). We model both the coseismic loading (from historical and palaeoseismic earthquakes) and interseismic loading (derived from Holocene fault slip-rates) using strike-variable fault geometries constrained by fieldwork. The inclusion of the elapsed times from available historical and palaeoseismological earthquakes and on faults enables us to calculate the stress on the faults prior to the beginning of the seismic sequence. We take account the 1316–4155 yr elapsed time on the Mt. Vettore fault (that ruptured during the 2016 A.D. seismic sequence) implied by palaeoseismology, and the 377 and 313 yr elapsed times on the neighbouring Laga and Norcia faults respectively, indicated by the historical record. The stress changes through time are summed to show the state of stress on the Mt. Vettore, Laga and surrounding faults prior to and during the 2016–2017 A.D. sequence. We show that the build up of stress prior to 2016 A.D. on strike-variable fault geometries generated stress heterogeneities that correlate with the limits of the main-shock ruptures. Hence, we suggest that stress barriers appear to have control on the propagation and therefore the magnitudes of the main-shock ruptures.

scholarly journals Supplemental Material: Is the Eastern Denali fault still active?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minhee Choi ◽  
David W. Eaton ◽  
et al.
Keyword(s):  
Hierarchical Clustering ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Stress Inversion ◽  
Moment Tensors ◽  
Stress Calculation ◽  
Denali Fault

Catalog of relocated seismicity, table of moment tensor parameters, detailed methodology of the velocity model, hierarchical clustering, moment tensors, stress inversion, Coulomb stress calculation, and Figures S1–S12.<br>

scholarly journals Multiple Lines of Evidence for a Potentially Seismogenic Fault Along the Central-Apennine (Italy) Active Extensional Belt–An Unexpected Outcome of the MW6.5 Norcia 2016 Earthquake

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Ferrarini ◽  
Rita de Nardis ◽  
Francesco Brozzetti ◽  
Daniele Cirillo ◽  
J Ramón Arrowsmith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Quaternary ◽  
Tectonic Setting ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Normal Fault ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Seismogenic Fault ◽  
Seismogenic Source

The Apenninic chain, in central Italy, has been recently struck by the Norcia 2016 seismic sequence. Three mainshocks, in 2016, occurred on August 24 (MW6.0), October 26 (MW 5.9) and October 30 (MW6.5) along well-known late Quaternary active WSW-dipping normal faults. Coseismic fractures and hypocentral seismicity distribution are mostly associated with failure along the Mt Vettore-Mt Bove (VBF) fault. Nevertheless, following the October 26 shock, the aftershock spatial distribution suggests the activation of a source not previously mapped beyond the northern tip of the VBF system. In this area, a remarkable seismicity rate was observed also during 2017 and 2018, the most energetic event being the April 10, 2018 (MW4.6) normal fault earthquake. In this paper, we advance the hypothesis that the Norcia seismic sequence activated a previously unknown seismogenic source. We constrain its geometry and seismogenic behavior by exploiting: 1) morphometric analysis of high-resolution topographic data; 2) field geologic- and morphotectonic evidence within the context of long-term deformation constraints; 3) 3D seismological validation of fault activity, and 4) Coulomb stress transfer modeling. Our results support the existence of distributed and subtle deformation along normal fault segments related to an immature structure, the Pievebovigliana fault (PBF). The fault strikes in NNW-SSE direction, dips to SW and is in right-lateral en echelon setting with the VBF system. Its activation has been highlighted by most of the seismicity observed in the sector. The geometry and location are compatible with volumes of enhanced stress identified by Coulomb stress-transfer computations. Its reconstructed length (at least 13 km) is compatible with the occurrence of MW≥6.0 earthquakes in a sector heretofore characterized by low seismic activity. The evidence for PBF is a new observation associated with the Norcia 2016 seismic sequence and is consistent with the overall tectonic setting of the area. Its existence implies a northward extent of the intra-Apennine extensional domain and should be considered to address seismic hazard assessments in central Italy.

The delayed aftershocks of the Illapel Earthquake Mw 8.3, 2015, Chile

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Lema ◽  
Mahesh Shrivastava
Keyword(s):  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Large Earthquake ◽  
Seismic Source ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Coulomb Stress Changes ◽  
Finite Fault ◽  
Stress Changes ◽  
2015 Illapel Earthquake ◽  
Illapel Earthquake

&lt;p&gt;The delayed aftershocks 2018 Mw 6.2 on April 10 and Mw 5.8 on Sept 1 and 2019 Mw 6.7 on January 20, Mw 6.4 on June 14, and Mw 6.2 on November 4, associated with the Mw 8.3 2015 Illapel Earthquake occurred in the &amp;#8203;&amp;#8203;central Chile. The seismic source of this earthquake has been studied with the GPS, InSAR and tide gauge network. Although there are several studies performed to characterize the robust aftershocks and the variations in the field of deformation induced by the megathrust, but there are still aspects to be elucidated of the relationship between the transfer of stresses from the interface between plates towards delayed aftershocks with the crustal structures with seismogenic potential. Therefore, the principal objective of this study is to understand how the stress transfer induced by the 2015 Illapel earthquake of the heterogeneous rupture mechanism to intermediate-deep or crustal earthquakes. For this, coulomb stress changes from &amp;#160;finite fault model of the Illapel earthquake and with the biggest aftershocks in year 2015 are used. These cumulative stress pattern provides substantial evidences for the delayed aftershocks in this region. The subducting Challenger Fault Zone and Juan Fernandez Ridge heterogeneity are existing feature, which releases the accumulated coulomb stress changes and provide delayed aftershocks.&amp;#160; Therefore along with stress induced by a large earthquake such as Mw 8.3 from Illapel 2015 along with biggest aftershocks, have a direct mechanism that may activate the&amp;#160; delayed aftershocks. Our study suggests &amp;#160;the activation of crustal faults in this research as a risk assessment factor for the evaluating in the seismic context of the region and useful for another subduction zone.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Coulomb Stress Transfer Influences Fault Reactivation in Areas of Wastewater Injection

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Qin ◽  
Xiaowei Chen ◽  
Brett M. Carpenter ◽  
Folarin Kolawole
Keyword(s):  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Fault Reactivation ◽  
Coulomb Stress

scholarly journals Static stress transfer from the May 20, 2012, M 6.1 Emilia-Romagna (northern Italy) earthquake using a co-seismic slip distribution model

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Ganas ◽  
Zafeiria Roumelioti ◽  
Konstantinos Chousianitis
Keyword(s):  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Northern Italy ◽  
Static Stress ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Coulomb Stress Changes ◽  
Seismic Slip ◽  
Seismological Data ◽  
Stress Changes ◽  
Fixed Orientation

<p>We model the static stress transfer for the May 2012 northern Italy earthquakes, assuming that failure of the crust occurs by shear. This allows the mechanics of the process to be approximated by the Okada (1992) expressions for displacement and strain fields due to a finite rectangular source in an elastic, homogeneous and isotropic half-space. The slip model of the May 20, 2012, earthquake was derived using empirical Green’s functions and a least-squares inversion scheme of source time functions computed from regional broadband seismological data. The derived model is then incorporated into the computation of Coulomb stress change (ΔCFF) to investigate the possibility that the May 20, 2012, M 6.1 event triggered the second earthquake that occurred on May 29, 2012 (M 5.9). We calculate the Coulomb stress changes for both: (a) optimally oriented planes to regional compression; and (b) planes of fixed orientation assuming that E-W striking, south-dipping thrust faults of the May 29, 2012, type of rupture was a candidate for failure. In both cases, we find that the triggering is promoted as the ΔCFF values in the hypocentral area of the May 29, 2012, earthquake are positive (between 0.61-0.74 bar).</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Evaluating models of Coulomb stress transfer: Is variable fault geometry important?

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (24) ◽  
pp. 12,407-12,414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe K. Mildon ◽  
Shinji Toda ◽  
Joanna P. Faure Walker ◽  
Gerald P. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Stress Transfer ◽  
Coulomb Stress ◽  
Fault Geometry
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document