On the Expected Relationships among Apparent Stress, Static Stress Drop, Effective Shear Fracture Energy, and Efficiency

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 1381-1389 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Beeler
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Energy ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Shear Fracture ◽  
Static Stress ◽  
Apparent Stress ◽  
Static Stress Drop

Microearthquakes and the nature of the creeping-to-locked transition of the San Andreas fault zone near San Juan Bautista, California

1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-254
Author(s):  
William H. Bakun ◽  
Marcia McLaren
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Dynamic Stress ◽  
San Andreas Fault ◽  
Static Stress ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Apparent Stress ◽  
San Andreas ◽  
Static Stress Drop

Abstract Eighteen digital event recorders were deployed during May-June 1981 along the creeping-to-locked transition of the San Andreas fault zone near San Juan Bautista, California, as a supplement to the U.S. Geological Survey's central California seismic network. Analysis of 18 well-recorded microearthquakes (0.7 ≦ ML ≦ 2.8) located along the transition confirms the complexity of the crust and fault-zone structure of the transition region. Seismic-wave site amplification is 2 to 10 times greater at sites between the San Andreas and Sargent fault traces, consistent with other evidence for lower velocities in the upper 3 km of crust there. Routine mislocation of epicenters 2 to 4 km northeast of the Sargent fault are consistent with greater P-wave velocity northeast of the Sargent fault. Microearthquake source parameters are consistent with a more segmented and splayed fault geometry toward the northwest locked end of the transition. P-wave nodal planes for 10 microearthquakes located to the northwest, 9 on the Sargent fault, and 1 near the San Andreas, are oriented more westerly than nodal planes commonly obtained for the frequent moderate-size earthquakes on the creeping section of the San Andreas fault to the southeast. Static stress drop, dynamic stress drop, and apparent stress estimates all increase with seismic moment, with the apparent stress and dynamic stress drops equal to about 3 and 20 per cent, respectively of the static stress drop. Average fracture energies, calculated assuming complete stress drop, generally increase with source size (seismic moment, rupture area, seismic slip, etc.) from 7 to 3000 J/m2; the two events with anomalously low fracture energies occurred on the creeping section of the San Andreas fault.

Source dimensions and stress drops of small earthquakes near Parkfield, California

1984 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-40
Author(s):  
M. E. O'Neill
Keyword(s):  
Stress Drop ◽  
Small Region ◽  
Static Stress ◽  
Depth Range ◽  
Zero Crossing ◽  
Source Dimensions ◽  
Duration Magnitude ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Static Stress Drop ◽  
Stress Drops

Abstract Source dimensions and stress drops of 30 small Parkfield, California, earthquakes with coda duration magnitudes between 1.2 and 3.9 have been estimated from measurements on short-period velocity-transducer seismograms. Times from the initial onset to the first zero crossing, corrected for attenuation and instrument response, have been interpreted in terms of a circular source model in which rupture expands radially outward from a point until it stops abruptly at radius a. For each earthquake, duration magnitude MD gave an estimate of seismic moment MO and MO and a together gave an estimate of static stress drop. All 30 earthquakes are located on a 6-km-long segment of the San Andreas fault at a depth range of about 8 to 13 km. Source radius systemically increases with magnitude from about 70 m for events near MD 1.4 to about 600 m for an event of MD 3.9. Static stress drop ranges from about 2 to 30 bars and is not strongly correlated with magnitude. Static stress drop does appear to be spatially dependent; the earthquakes with stress drops greater than 20 bars are concentrated in a small region close to the hypocenter of the magnitude 512 1966 Parkfield earthquake.

scholarly journals Static stress drop as determined from geodetic strain rates and statistical seismicity

2011 ◽  
Vol 116 (B2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Caporali ◽  
Salvatore Barba ◽  
Michele M. C. Carafa ◽  
Roberto Devoti ◽  
Grazia Pietrantonio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Drop ◽  
Static Stress ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
Static Stress Drop ◽  
Geodetic Strain

Source physics interpretation of non-self-similar double-corner frequency source spectral model JA19_2S

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Ji ◽  
Ralph Archuleta
Keyword(s):  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Dynamic Stress ◽  
Static Stress ◽  
Corner Frequency ◽  
Rupture Velocity ◽  
Dynamic Stress Drop ◽  
Self Similar ◽  
Static Stress Drop ◽  
Frequency Source

<p>Source spectral models developed for strong ground motion simulations are phenomenological models that represent the average effect that the source processes have on near fault ground motion. Their parameters are directly regressed from the observations and often do not have clear meaning for the physics of the source process. We investigate the relation between the kinematic double-corner frequency (DCF) source spectral model JA19_2S (Ji and Archuleta, BSSA, 2020) and static fault geometry scaling relations proposed by Leonard (2010). We derive scaling relations for the low and high corner frequency in terms of static stress drop, dynamic stress drop, fault rupture velocity, fault aspect ratio, and relative hypocenter location. We find that the non-self-similar low corner frequency  scaling relation of JA19_2S model for 5.3<<strong>M</strong><6.9 earthquakes is well explained using the fault length scaling relation of Leonard’s model combined with a constant rupture velocity. Earthquakes following both models have constant average static stress drop and constant average dynamic stress drop. The high frequency source radiation is controlled by seismic moment, static stress drop and dynamic stress drop but strongly modulated by the fault aspect ratio and the hypocenter’s relative location. The mean, scaled energy  (or apparent stress) decreases with magnitude due to the magnitude dependence of the fault aspect ratio. Based on these two models, the commonly quoted average rupture velocity of 70-80% of shear wave speed implies predominantly unilateral rupture.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document