About judicial protection of subjective civil rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Yury N. Andreev
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Optimal Ratio ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Subjective Rights

The article is devoted to the judicial protection of subjective civil rights. The author tries to formulate the concepts of subjective civil rights and the judicial protection of subjective civil rights to determine the ratio of subjective civil rights and the right to judicial protection as well as the judicial protection features of various subjective civil rights categories. The paper presents the authors conception of subjective rights, the various ways by which they are protected, and the features of the protection of certain types of subjective civil rights. The aim of the research is to find the most optimal ratio of the right of subjective rights owner to protection and the right of subjective right for protection, in order to determine the most typical ways to protect certain categories of subjective civil rights. The methodological basis of the research includes the well-known general and private scientific methods of scientific knowledge. The paper concludes by stating that subjective civil rights have general (universal) and specific ways of protection.

scholarly journals Constitutional Complaint in Ukraine: The Interrelation Between the Protection of Subjective Civil Rights and Constitutional Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 341-354
Author(s):  
Oleksandr D. Krupchan ◽  
◽  
Volodymyr V. Kochyn ◽  
Vitalii I. Zaporozhets ◽  
Mykyta V. Bernatskyi
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Individual Rights ◽  
Real Possibility ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Subjective Rights

The real possibility of judicial protection of individual rights and freedoms is a key element of effective legal regulation, as well as the manifestation of the rule of law. The new institution of the constitutional complaint lies in a rather specific plane, being both a part of the national system of protection of individual rights and freedoms and an element of constitutional control that ensures the supremacy of the Constitution of Ukraine. The relevance of this study is conditioned by the right of a citizen to complain about the mechanism of legal regulation, taking the provisions of the Constitution as an example. The purpose of the study is to consider the specific features of the interrelation between the protection of subjective civil rights and constitutional control. This study analyses the theoretical aspects, legislative regulation, and practice of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. It was concluded that subjective rights and interests established by law might be violated, unrecognised or challenged only at the stages of legal implementation or enforcement.

Access to Justice: Ukraine and Europe

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1122
Author(s):  
Tetiana M. BREZINA ◽  
Nadiia P. BORTNYK ◽  
Iryna Yu. KHOMYSHYN
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Modern Concept ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
European Experience ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Right Of Access

The paper examines the right of access to justice through the lens of domestic and European experience. The purpose of the study is to improve the theoretical and legal provisions of the content of the right of access to justice based on European experience, the formation of its modern concept, including the construction of proposals for defining this concept in the domestic doctrine of the judiciary. The methodological basis of the study comprises a set of methods that have been comprehensively used to achieve the purposes of this paper: the study of the legal nature of the right of access to justice, the establishment of its structural elements, the formulation of conclusions and proposals for the implementation of European Court of Human Rights standards in Ukrainian legislation was carried out with the use of system-structural and Aristotelian methods. It is noted that the access to justice is the availability, legal consolidation, and direct functioning of guarantees stipulated by law, which allow everyone to freely exercise their right to judicial protection and restoration of the violated right. It is concluded that the right to judicial protection cannot be exercised without a mechanism of access to justice and legal regulation. Ukraine, as a full subject of international law, must guarantee, based on universal standards, the personal right of every individual to free access to justice. However, identification of the social nature of the right of access to justice, for any state, including Ukraine, means an assertion of a fairly wide margin of appreciation both upon specifying forms of support for citizens to exercise the right, and upon determining the categories of citizens who need such support. This obliges the legislator to respect the constitutional principles of justice, equality, proportionality, as well as stability and guarantee of human and civil rights in Ukraine.

scholarly journals GUARANTEES OF ACCESS TO ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

Introduction. Administrative proceedings for Ukrainian administrative law, as well as for the administrative law of most post-Soviet states, are a relatively new legal phenomenon. This presupposes the existence of many problems of its formation, which are connected, in particular, with the socio-political transformations that are still going on. These are, first of all, such problems as the formation and legislative consolidation of the legal basis for guaranteeing access and protection in the administrative court. Unhindered access to court and access to justice are necessary conditions for the exercise of the constitutional right to judicial protection. The main results of the study. Access to justice is one of the prerequisites for the establishment of this branch of government as a full-fledged and self-sufficient mechanism for the protection of human rights and freedoms. The Constitution of Ukraine laid the foundations for the formation of access to justice, stipulating that recourse to the court for the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms is guaranteed directly on the basis of the Basic Law. The influence of international normative legal acts on the development of national legislation regulating a person's right to apply to an administrative court for protection was considered. The Constitution of Ukraine guarantees the right of a person to judicial protection and appeal against decisions, actions or omissions of public authorities, local governments, officials and officials. Administrative justice is called upon to implement this provision. Conclusions. The article determined that the right to appeal against decisions, actions or omissions of public authorities, local governments, officials and officials, a component of which is the right to go to court (right to access to court proceedings), is not abstract, but has a connection. connection with the right of a particular person in whose interests the trial is taking place, and with his conviction that the state, represented by public authorities and local governments, officials and officials have unlawfully interfered with his rights or freedoms. The obligatory feature of a public law dispute was that a person believes that there is a violation of his rights and freedoms as a result of the performance or non-performance of government functions. In order to go to court, a person who is a plaintiff must have a substantive legal interest in resolving a public law dispute. The article highlighted and analyzed some problems of ensuring access to justice by administrative courts in resolving public law disputes. His own vision for solving and eliminating the problems of access to justice in administrative proceedings is offered.

scholarly journals Issues of implementation of equality of arms principle in case of declaring the applied law unconstitutional

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-55
Author(s):  
Iryna Berestova ◽  
Oksana Khotynska-Nor
Keyword(s):  
National Level ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Litigation Process ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Law ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The Article considers the issue of ensuring the constitutional principle of equality of litigants before the law and the court during review of the judgement in view of the exceptional circumstances after consideration of the case by the Constitutional Court. Based on the study of legal nature of such consequences of nullity of the law as pro futuro, ex nunc, ex tunc, the risks of violation of the constitutional right of a person to judicial protection shall be established. The aim of the Article is to detect the objective demonstration of the constitutional principle of equality of litigants before the law and the court. The methods of the study: system, dialectical, integrative, interdisciplinary and scientific methods applied to detect the interrelation between the constitutional principle of equality of arms and its practical demonstration in litigation process. The main results of the study. Two components affecting the efficiency of protection of such right have been established: future effect of the judgement of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and impossibility to consider the application in view of exceptional circumstances if before appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine a person’s claim was dismissed in full under the applicable laws and was further declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court. The erroneous legal position of the supreme court in the system of the judiciary of Ukraine was proved in terms of the impossibility of initiating proceeding in exceptional circumstances after delivery of the judgement of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine due to the fact that the person’s claim had previously been dismissed and such a judgement does not provide for its enforcement. This conclusion deprives a person of the right to a final trial at the national level in accordance with the procedure of applying to the court (Articles 8, 24, 55, paragraph 1 Part 2 of Article 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine). It is proposed to develop a special law establishing the grounds and procedure for compensation by the state of moral and financial damages caused by the law recognized as the unconstitutional one.

scholarly journals Prawo osobowe na ziemiach polskich wcielonych do Rzeszy Niemieckiej podczas drugiej wojny światowej

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-514
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kruszewski
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Third Reich ◽  
National Socialist ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Reich ◽  
New Interpretation ◽  
German People ◽  
The Right ◽  
Subjective Rights

The subject of this article are basic questions within the range of civil law. They concern the general position of a human and legal people in the sphere of this law on Polish territory, which was incorporated into the Third Reich. The position of individuals, the citizens of II RP, under the occupation of the Third Reich in years 1939–1945, is analysed by the author not from the perspective of literal meaning of regulations of general part of Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) from 1896, but from the perspective of their specific interpretation, congruent with strategic and ideological purposes of the Nazi regime. In the article, the following issues are touched upon in turn: 1) personal law in terms of classical civil law contra national-socialist regime; 2) racism towards civil rights of a subjective individual; 3) elimination of the Jews from the legal relationships of civil law; 4) difficulties in the sphere of access to certain professions for Polish people and some restrictions upon personal rights; 5) the dependence of possibilities of exercising the private personal right on the consent to denationalization; 6) ban concerning getting married and the right to motherhood and fatherhood; 7) legislation of sterilisation and euthanasia. The formal changes in the legislation which were in force in the Third Reich — except for personal and family law (as well as legal rules connected with it regarding health protection of offspring), and “peasant law” (Bauernrecht) — were not significant, as is proved by the author. The old legal order was reversed in the Third Reich due to its new interpretation: classical concepts and legal institutions were filled with a different content. After the formal extension of BGB to territories incorporated into the Reich, which followed the decree of 25 September 1941 introducing German civil law, these territories became a field of social-political and racial-nationalist experiments, which in fact had a little in common with the German Civil Code’s regulations. A principle of equal access to private subjective rights was respected only in case of German people, i.a. the part which passively gave up to indoctrination. In relation to Jews, racism spoiled in this case the idea and concept of private subjective rights.

GUARANTEES AS AN ELEMENT OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF A JUDGE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaliy Hudyma ◽  
◽  
Myroslav Kovaliv ◽  
Andriy Pryveda ◽  
Khrystyna Kaydrovych ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Independent Judiciary ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article is devoted to the study of guarantees as an element of the legal status of a judge. The article considers the effectiveness of justice by the judiciary as an independent branch of state power, which is entrusted with the function of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of persons in the state. It is argued that the right to judicial protection can be properly realized only if there is an effective mechanism of judicial protection, which becomes real if there are guarantees for the activity of a judge. The independence and independence of the judiciary is due to the constitutional principle of separation of powers, proclaimed in the Constitution of Ukraine. However, it is in democracies that this principle acquires special significance, because we are talking about legally enshrined guarantees and effective mechanisms of «containment and balances» in the organization and activities of various branches of government. Each of the branches of government – legislative, executive and judicial, independently performs only its inherent functions, not obeying each other. Decisions are made by the judiciary due to their independence, because no additional approval by the bodies of other branches of government is required. The most important prerequisite for this is the protection of the judiciary from unlawful influence or interference from other actors. Only an independent judiciary can become the guarantor of the rule of law, the implementation of effective and accessible justice and a fair judicial decision of cases in the state. The guarantees of the judge's activity in the administration of justice are divided into three groups: guarantees of the procedural activity of the judge as the bearer of judicial power, the subject of the process; organizational and legal guarantees for the activity of a judge as a person holding a public office and is a member of the judicial community; social and legal guarantees of a judge as a citizen with a special legal status, limited in civil rights by legislation on the status of judges and occupying a separate position in society.

scholarly journals Guarantees within tax legal relations: challenges of the present day

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (71) ◽  
pp. 405-416
Author(s):  
Yevhen Leheza ◽  
Andrii Novytskyi ◽  
Alina Kravziuk ◽  
Nataliia Repekha ◽  
Artem Yefremov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Stated Objective

The purpose of the research is dedicated to modern challenges related to the implementation of legal guarantees within tax legal relationships. Legal guarantees within tax legal relations are the embodiment of the constitutional and legal guarantees of human and civil rights and, at the same time, act as an integrated intersectoral tool, covering both the administrative, financial and tax spheres respectively. The methodological basis of the article consisted of a set of general and special methods of scientific knowledge that, when applied, provide the opportunity to achieve the stated objective and ensure the scientific reliability and validity of the theoretical conclusions obtained. It is concluded that, to implement the potential to ensure taxpayers' choice of alternative methods of taxation, it is necessary to create conditions for commercial entities to perform the appropriate calculations and make the appropriate decisions. Entrepreneurs should receive government help in this through various electronic services.

scholarly journals Transformations of the Right to Health Care Content, and its Connection with the Right to Biotechnology

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.26) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Alsu M. Khurmatullina ◽  
Rimma R. Amirova
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Right To Health ◽  
Patent Analysis ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Right To Health Care ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Right

The paper updates the concept and the content of the constitutional right of a person and citizen. The concept of "biotechnology" is emphasized. The possibility of applying the methods of patent analysis to study the state of biotechnology is discussed.The results of the study are based on the use of the following methods: a universal dialectical method of scientific knowledge, as well as general scientific methods based on it (description, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, analogy, generalization) and specific scientific methods (comparative legal, system-structural and formal legal).  

scholarly journals Civil Right Protection Limits: Issues of the Theory and Practice

CIVIL LAW ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Aleksandr B. Stepin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State And Local ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

Civil rights protection is an independent sphere of legal activity where subjective civil rights and powers of state and local self-government bodies and their officials are implemented. Ensuring compliance (coherence, balance) of the implementation of civil rights and individual public powers with the norms(s) of the law is achieved by means of limits (rules) judicial and non-judicial protection. The limits of protection are a system concept that combines the (internal) limits (rules) of the exercise of subjective civil rights (art. 10 of the civil code of the Russian Federation) and (external) limits (rules)of the authority granted (in the proper administrative procedure). They are considered together and characterize the officially established order of protection. When resolving complex issues of law enforcement related to the type of legal proceedings, the choice of the form and appropriate method of protection, etc., the limits allow you to avoid and (or) minimize the possible risks of adverse consequences in the implementation of the right to protection. At the stages of applying, securing and restoring the violated (disputed) right, the limits determine the sequence of implementation of the methods (means) of protection, the model of behavior, the scope of actions (inaction) of the counterparty, etc.

scholarly journals Features of legal qualification of infliction of harm wild and pets.

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-417
Author(s):  
Анна Рабец ◽  
Anna Rabec
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legislation And Jurisprudence ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Special Relevance

in article questions of legal qualification of infliction of harm wild and pets to citizens and legal entities are considered. Identification of a place of animals among sources of the increased danger gains special relevance in connection with insufficient regulation in the civil legislation of the Russian Federation of the number of the aspects connected with indemnification, caused by animals as specific objects of the civil rights. A research objective was definition of the effective civil mechanism of protection of the victims in case of causing harm by it animal. General scientific methods of knowledge (the analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction, deduction) formed a methodological basis of research, and also is formal – legal, the historian - legal and rather – legal methods. In research the offers and recommendations promoting uniform application of norms of civil law in the specified situations are formulated. On the basis of the analysis of the civil legislation and jurisprudence right application problems in the considered area are revealed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document