scholarly journals Protection of cross-border trafficking of intellectual property in the context of the economic and legal integration of the Russian Federation

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-203
Author(s):  
A O Inshakova

The article is devoted to legal analysis of qualitative renewal of existing civil law regarding the protection of intellectual property rights and means of individualization associated with the modernization of the economy and legal system of the Russian Federation, its entry into international organizations such as the Council of Europe, the EurAsEC Customs Union, WTO. International uniform standards for protection of intellectual property, taking into account the growing «immensity» of their turnover, and the risks associated with the misuse of their use, including for the purpose of infringing competition and monopolize the market, pay close attention to the institution of a national legislator exclusive right to the products of creative activity. In order to assess compliance with international standards such updated provisions of the Russian civil law the analysis of foreign legislation, jurisprudence and doctrine. The author’s evaluation of common internationally recognized approaches and standards for the creation, registration and use of the results of intellectual activity, legal protection, commercialization and protection of the rights to them, requiring reflection in a national legal reform also takes into account the active development of globalization and building a global information society.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Morgunova ◽  
Nataliya Frolova

The textbook presents doctrinal approaches, positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, judicial practice, Russian and foreign legislation on issues related to the essence of legal protection of individual intellectual property objects and the nature of the exclusive right to them, contractual structures in the field of intellectual property, as well as the protection of exclusive rights to intellectual property objects. It is prepared for the development of undergraduates studying under the program" Master of Private Law", the discipline "Exclusive law in civil circulation", but can also be used in the study of legal protection of intellectual property results and means of individualization in the course "Civil Law" by bachelors, specialists, as well as in other master's programs. It may be of interest to students, postgraduates, scientists, teachers, practitioners, and anyone interested in intellectual property issues.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6(56)) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
O.V. Nikulina

The purpose of this study is to substantiate the need to revise the current legislation in terms of determining the circle of participants in legal relations for the creation and use of official results of intellectual activity. Through scientific research, the creation of inventions, selection achievements and other results of intellectual activity, including official ones, the scientific and technical potential of scientists in the Russian Federation is realized. However, disputes often arise between legal entities (employers) and the creators of the result of intellectual property (employees) on the creation and use of such a result. The author examines the circle of participants in legal relations associated with the creation of a service result of intellectual activity and with its subsequent use. The characteristics of the subjects of the studied relations are given, the problem of defining the work of co-authors as joint is revealed. The conclusion is made about the need to transfer the priority in determining the subjects of legal relations to create an official creative result from the terminology used in labor law to civil law terminology. Provisions are proposed for amending modern legislation, namely: replacing the term «employee» with «author» in the norms on service RIA, and the term «employer» with «employer».


Legal Concept ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 99-104
Author(s):  
Elmira Baibekova

Introduction: the paper is devoted to the study of the institution of corporate agreement incorporated into the Russian legislation in the course of the civil law reform. The purpose is to determine the essence, meaning and basic characteristics of the corporate agreement in civil law of Russia, by virtue whereof, the author analyzes the concept of subject of the corporate agreement, the main aspects of its legal nature, and also produces a comparative legal analysis of the correlation of the company’s charter and the corporate agreement. Using the methods of scientific knowledge, especially the method of system analysis, in order to identify the areas of improvement of the corporate agreement in the field of regulating corporate rights and obligations, the author analyzes the corporate agreement’s role in the implementation and protection of the company’s corporate rights, as well as in the development of corporate relations. The necessity of further detailed legislative regulation of corporate agreements is argued. Results: the legal confirmation of the institution of corporate agreement in the civil legislation of the Russian Federation allowed the participants of business companies to implement and control their corporate rights and obligations, as well as liability for their non-performance, in accordance with this agreement. Conclusions: corporate agreement is a relatively new institution for the Russian reality, so it requires special attention. It is of great interest to business, which can be seen in practical examples, even the largest corporations with the state participation become parties to such agreements. The need for a detailed study of the corporate agreement is due to the ambiguous position of the legislator regarding the essence, meaning and content of this agreement. The absence of a solid theoretical basis on these issues can have a very negative impact on the law enforcement practice.


Author(s):  
Maryam Abdurakhmanovna Akhmadova

The subject of this research is the examination of legal perspective on the approaches towards regulation of artificial intelligence and robotic technologies in military sector of the Russian Federation, including in ensuring the protection of the results of intellectual activity of researchers and developers, as well as the analysis of law enforcement practice on the protection of intellectual property in the interests of the state. In this format, the author determines the key conditions for recognition of the results of intellectual activity of military, special, and dual purpose as protectable object in accordance with the effective civil legislation. Attention is given to the practical results of domestic military equipment development using the artificial intelligence systems. The scientific novelty consists in articulation of the problem and approaches towards its research. The conclusion is made wide use of artificial intelligence technologies in the sphere of ensuring national security, as well as regulation based on the technical approach, rather than legal, not only create advantages in the military context, but can also cause issues that must be resolved. Taking into account real achievements in legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity, including the theoretical component, the author ascertains the need for improvement of the legislative framework on both, federal level and bylaws, including for the purpose of achieving a uniform use of the conceptual-categorical apparatus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
E.A. SUKHANOV

The article highlights the role of prof. A.L. Makovsky in the creation of the new Civil Code of the Russian Federation of 1994–2006, as well as in the organization of the practice of its application and the development of the Concept for the Development of Civil Legislation of the Russian Federation in 2009. Special attention is paid to the activities of A.L. Makovsky on the preparation of the Fourth Part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and the concept of intellectual rights enshrined by it, opposing the traditional archaic concept of “intellectual property”. The importance of the need to increase the attention of civil law to the issue of protecting the rights and interests of citizens and other weakest participants in civil legal relations in their opposition to the interests of large companies striving to take a privileged position in property turnover is shown. From this point of view, the author substantiates the need for a significant adjustment in the understanding of the balance of private and public interests, which is the basis of civil law regulation.


Author(s):  
Maryam Abdurakhmanovna Akhmadova

The subject of this research is the international acts in the area of scientific and technical cooperation of the BRICS countries – bilateral agreements between the Governments of the Russian Federation and Brazil (2007), Russian Federation and India (1994), Russian Federation and China (1992), Russian Federation and South Africa (2014), and others pertaining to protection and security of rights to intellectual property. Attention is focused on the problematic moments in legal regulation of the “preceding” and “created” within the framework of these acts of intellectual property, including the questions of dispute settlement between the parties, the order of allocation of rights to service development and compensation for them, structure and content of separate contracts concluded in accordance with the indicated agreements, etc. The scientific novelty consists in articulation of the problem and approaches towards its research. The author comes to the conclusion on the sufficient elaboration of the bilateral agreements between the Russian Federation, India and China, which is viewed as a crucial factor in the development of further cooperation in this area for the purpose of ensuring of economic modernization of these countries on the innovative basis. However, the cooperation between Brazil and South Africa is not well developed, therefore the leadership of these countries does not take measures on development and signing of intergovernmental protocol to the Agreement between the Russian Federation and Brazil, called to regulate mainly the questions of legal protection of intellectual property, which manifests as the factor hampering the development of cooperation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 167-178
Author(s):  
Olesia Valer'evna Belaia

The object of this research is the determination of legal nature of genomic research data and their role among the objects of civil law. The subject of this research is the data of preclinical and clinical studies of pharmaceutical products, mostly those that contain biomaterial and biomedical cell products. The author underlines the problem of the absence of due legal regulation of genomic research data as the objects of law within Russian legislation, as well as protection of their rightsholders from anticompetitive use. The author reveals the possibility of recognizing genomic research data as the results of intellectual activity that are subject to legal protection as objects of intellectual property, as well as the need to enshrine them in the provisions of the Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion consists in the substantiation of the need for protection of genomic research data as the objects of civil law. Arguments are adduced on the potential reference of genomic research as the results of intellectual activity to the objects of intellectual property. The list of data that may comprise trade secret is subjected to critical analysis. The author proposes the original classification of the results of intellectual activity as the objects of intellectual property from the perspective of the presence of creative beginning as directly invented by human, and indirectly reflecting the result of human activity. The conclusion is formulated on the independent nature of the results of genomic research as the objects of intellectual property in the form of the results of intellectual activity. The author underlines the need for protecting genomic research data as a variety of results of such tests as the know-how, as well as corresponding revision of legal definition of trade secret captured in civil legislation.


Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 124-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kh. V. Idrisov

The paper is devoted to the legal analysis of the consequences of a new coronavirus infection, due to which the World Health Organization declared a pandemic. By its nature, this infectious phenomenon refers to a force majeure event. Within the framework of the scientific research, the author describes the concept of force majeure, as well as the features of emergency and unavoidability that make up this legal category. In addition, a number of regulatory legal acts regulating public relations in this area are subject to legal analysis, both adopted earlier and published literally from the very beginning of the spread of coronavirus infection throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. Along with the analysis of the regulatory legal acts, the paper also provides judicial practice on the issue under consideration. Based on the legal analysis of the issues under study, it is concluded that adequate legal regulation of the consequences of the coronavirus infection within the framework of relations between civil law subjects will guarantee the participants mutual bona fide behavior in accordance with the norms established by civil law, and in the case of unfair behavior — the implementation of civil liability measures for such subjects. In conclusion, it is noted that prompt and qualitative regulation of the consequences of the coronavirus infection is one of the key tasks in the legal field in the current situation, since contract law, which includes provisions on force majeure, plays an important role in the development and maintenance of stability of civil turnover, providing all its participants with legal guarantees for the implementation of the basic norms and rules established in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation concerning the conclusion and execution of contracts.


Author(s):  
MARYAM AKHMADOVA ◽  

The article discusses the procedure for the implementation of military-technical cooperation and the delimitation of ownership rights to its results between the BRICS countries - the Russian Federation and Brazil, the Russian Federation and South Africa. At the same time, the focus of the author's attention is on the transfer and use of previous intellectual property, the distribution of rights to the results of intellectual activity and the procedure for resolving disagreements and disputes between the contracting parties and (or) participants to contracts. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that military-technical cooperation has a strategic role for modern Russia, designed, on the one hand, to strengthen the country's military and political positions in the world, and on the other, serves the purpose of maintaining the country's defense capability and military security at the proper level. The research conducted based on such methods of scientific cognition as: general scientific dialectical, formal legal and comparative legal methods, etc. At the same time, the author proceeds from the subjective-objective determination of processes and phenomena, and their interconnectedness. The novelty of this research is determined by its very purpose, subject and range of sources under consideration. In this format, the author came to the conclusion that the approaches of the BRICS countries under consideration on some key aspects of regulating the protection of intellectual property, both transferred and created within the framework of military-technical cooperation, are largely similar. At the same time, the regulation of the use of the results of intellectual activity is the basis of relations between the Russian Federation and the BRICS countries in military-technical cooperation and is aimed at excluding unauthorized use of such products, therefore, the conclusion is formulated that the regulatory framework in the field of military-technical cooperation in terms of its international legal component on ensuring the protection of intellectual property transferred and received within the framework of such cooperation needs further improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document