scholarly journals Clinical bioethics on successful path

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1028-1031
Author(s):  
Farida Tansykovna Nezhmetdinova ◽  
Marina Elisovna Guryleva ◽  
Sal'vador Ribas ◽  
Gordana Pelčić
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Bioethics

The Italian Master in Clinical Bioethics Consultation: 2013-2020 Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
Dario Sacchini ◽  
◽  
Pietro Refolo ◽  
Barbara Corsano ◽  
Mario Picozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ethics Consultation ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Local Health ◽  
University Campus ◽  
Clinical Bioethics ◽  
Sacred Heart ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The One ◽  
Basic Features

"This work is aimed at critically illustring the eight-year experience of the Master in “Clinical Bioethics Consultation” (2013-2020). This advanced second-level Master was promoted in 2013 by the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart of Rome, and co-worked by other Italian clinical as well as academic institutions (University Campus Bio-medico of Rome, Insubria University of Varese, “Federico II” University of Naples, Lanza Foundation of Padua, Local Health and Social Care Unit n. 7 (ULSS) of Veneto Region, Treviso; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli – Isola Tiberina, Rome, and Italian Group for clinical ethics consultation (GIBCE)). To this aim, it first will discuss two points: on the one hand, an epistemological one, i.e. the justification of the activity of ethics consultant in clinical settings supported by the authors; on the other hand, a pedagogical one, i.e. the identification of the learning needs clinical bioethics gives birth to. The second part of the work will focus on the experience of the Master, explaining its basic features (objectives, methods, contents, evaluation tools, etc), offering a critical review, and identifying the challenges this initiative has to face in the next future. "

Chapitre 10. Clinical Bioethics

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinaldo Ayer De Oliveira ◽  
Gabriel Oselka ◽  
Cláudio Cohen ◽  
Ségio Ibiapina Ferreira Costa
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Bioethics

Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists’ professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives

2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106760
Author(s):  
Jason Adam Wasserman ◽  
Mark Christopher Navin ◽  
Victoria Drzyzga ◽  
Tyler S Gibb
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Clinical Bioethics ◽  
Personal Use ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Professional Perspectives ◽  
Consensus View

The field of clinical bioethics strongly advocates for the use of advance directives to promote patient autonomy, particularly at the end of life. This paper reports a study of clinical bioethicists’ perceptions of the professional consensus about advance directives, as well as their personal advance care planning practices. We find that clinical bioethicists are often sceptical about the value of advance directives, and their personal choices about advance directives often deviate from what clinical ethicists acknowledge to be their profession’s recommendations. Moreover, our respondents identified a pluralistic set of justifications for completing treatment directives and designating surrogates, even while the consensus view focuses on patient autonomy. Our results suggest important revisions to academic discussion and public-facing advocacy about advance care planning.

scholarly journals In defence of clinical bioethics.

1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Arras ◽  
T H Murray
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Bioethics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document