scholarly journals 65 Letter to the editor. Volume 25, № 7-8 (1929)

1929 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 974-974

The Russian balneological society in Pyatigorsk on August 10th this year honors its member, the oldest Russian balneologist Alexander Alexandrovich Lozinsky, on the occasion of the thirty-fifth anniversary of scientific and medical-social activity. The Jubilee Commission asks you to place this notice for the attention of fellow doctors and institutions and medical societies. Address: Pyatigorsk, Balneologich. About Dr. I. A. Sveshnikova.

1908 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 624

The Board of the Society of Russian Doctors in memory of N.I. Pirogov asks you not to refuse to print in your edition of the "Basic provisions of the draft statute" of the All-Russian Society of Physicians in memory of N.I. Pirogov and the following appeal to medical societies and individual doctors of Pirogov: The congress of doctors elected a commission of 12 persons, which, together with the Board of the Pirogov Society, should revise the charter of the Pirogov Society and develop a draft charter of the Pirogov All-Russian Union of Physicians.


1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200
Author(s):  
Peter B. Smith
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Lawrence I. Shotland
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
David Cieliczka
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
Larry Engelmann
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Gregory Frazer
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Edwin L. Harless
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-89
Author(s):  
Bill Fitzgibbon
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-74
Author(s):  
Kazunari J. Koike
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 4325-4326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Meister ◽  
Katrin Fuersen ◽  
Barbara Streicher ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Martin Walger

Purpose The purpose of this letter is to compare results by Skuk et al. (2020) with Meister et al. (2016) and to point to a potential general influence of stimulus type. Conclusion Our conclusion is that presenting sentences may give cochlear implant recipients the opportunity to use timbre cues for voice perception. This might not be the case when presenting brief and sparse stimuli such as consonant–vowel–consonant or single words, which were applied in the majority of studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document