Sacrovaginopexy with combined access and mesh-vaginopexy in the treatment of genital prolapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
A. A. Popov ◽  
S. L. Gorsky ◽  
G. G. Shaginyan ◽  
M. R. Ramazanov

Comparative analysis of two modem methods of womens genital prolapse treatment was carried out. Comparing close and some remote results of MESH- vaginopexy (97patients) andtransvaginal retroperitonealsacrovaginopexy with laparoscopic control (24 patients), the authors determine particular indications, advantages and expediency of the elaborated methods.

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaliy Fedorovich Bezhenar ◽  
Yevgeniya Sergeyevna Guseva ◽  
Anna Alekseyevna Tsypurdeyeva ◽  
Yelena Ivanovna Rusina ◽  
Liliya Karlovna Tsuladze

There was made a comparative analysis of surgical complications, life quality of patients and also sexual life quality after the correction of genital prolapse with the implants Prosima™ and Prolift™. There were reflected the advantages of the operation when the implants Prosima™ were used while correcting the genital prolapsed of III stage compared with the use of the implant Prolift™. There was shown the success of the operation Prosima™, its safety because of little invasiveness and few number of complications, satisfaction of the patients with the results of the treatment and also the improvement of the life quality and restoration of sexual activity.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Luis H. Braga ◽  
Joao L. Pippi Salle ◽  
Sumit Dave ◽  
Sean Skeldon ◽  
Armando J. Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document