scholarly journals Development and Approbation of Methods for Diagnostics of Predisposition to Monosemantic or Polysemantic Context Generation

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-107
Author(s):  
N.A. Khokhlov ◽  
G.D. Laskov
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Functional Asymmetry ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Common Variance ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
The Common ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

This article focuses on the development of methods to measure personality and cognitive predisposition to monosemantic or polysemantic context generation (PCG).In accordance with the concept of V.S. Rotenberg, we assumed that PCG was connected with manual functional asymmetry. We developed four tests: one was designed to measure personality PCG, the other three measure cognitive PCG. Approbation samples consisted of 160—736 participants. Cronbach's alpha (0.67—0.93) and split-half coefficient (0.72—0.93) were calculated for all tests, for two of them test-retest reliability (0.47—0.91) was measured. Variance of personal PCG on 21.7% is explained by the variance of personality traits “reticence-sociability” and “concreteness-abstractness”. Personality and cognitive PCG are interconnected, but they have a fair amount of specificity. Manual functional asymmetry is weakly connected with personal PCG (not more than 1.5% of the common variance) and is not connected with cognitive PCG

scholarly journals Validation of Sinhala Version of Brief COPE Scale in Patients with Cancer in Sri Lanka

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eranthi Weeratunga ◽  
Chandanie Senadheera ◽  
Manjula Hettiarachchi ◽  
Bilesha Perera
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Maladaptive Coping ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Brief Cope ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Coping strategies are essential in the cancer management/recovery process and show an integral part in patients with cancer globally. In Sri Lanka, validated scales to measure coping are scarce. This study was examined the Sinhalese version of the Brief COPE for its psychometric properties. Methods This scale is self-administered (28 items) and consists of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies; divided into 14 subscales. Cancer patients were registered ‘first come - first serve’ basis using their appointment register at the Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology ward, Teaching Hospital, Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka. They were requested to complete the Sinhalese version of the Brief COPE and demographic details. Test-retest reliability was checked using the same subjects two weeks later. Factorial validity was performed using exploratory factor and principal component analysis. Results were regarded as statistically significant if p < 0.05. Results The mean (±SD) age of the sample was 61(±12) years. The mean adaptive coping (±SD) and maladaptive coping were 37.50 (±8.14) and 17.10 (±2.44) respectively. The internal consistency of the overall scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha - 0.819). Adaptive and maladaptive coping showed a high Cronbach’s alpha (0.861 and 0.396). The test-retest reliability was found to be 0.66. The Sinhala version of BC was found to have a negative correlation with the CES-D scale but was positively correlated with the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Seven factors were extracted. Conclusion The Sinhala version of the Brief COPE is a valid and reliable tool to assess coping strategies among patients with cancer. The findings of this study would let the health authorities get an understanding of coping strategies among patients with cancer; and the impact on cancer victims and family members to relieve their suffering.

scholarly journals Psychometric of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anggi Setyowati ◽  
Min-Huey Chung ◽  
Ah. Yusuf ◽  
Setya Haksama
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Exploration Inventory

Background: Curiosity is a personality characteristic, which fits with wellbeing and positive functioning. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory II (CEI-II) in Indonesia.Design and Methods: The study included 256 undergraduate students who lived in Indonesia, mean age 19.8 years old. The CEI-II measures stretching and embracing using 11 items. The English version of CEI-II was translated into Bahasa. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were addressed to examine internal consistency reliability and the test-retest reliability. To evaluate construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess factor structure and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the structural model fit of the CEI-II Indonesia version.Results: The study showed Cronbach’s alpha for the internal consistency of the overall CEI-II Indonesia version was 0.77. The ICC for the test-retest reliability ranged between 0.753-0.829. EFA showed adequate with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.86 and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was statistically significant. CFA tested the second-order model with two-order factors and showed a model fit.Conclusions: The CEI-II Indonesia version indicated acceptable construct validity to evaluate curiosity in Indonesia.

scholarly journals The validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of a modified Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI-2) as a tool for serial measurements of health enablement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Elizabeth Bedford ◽  
Maegan Hon Yan Yeung ◽  
Chi Ho Au ◽  
Emily Tsui Yee Tse ◽  
Wing Yee Yim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Reliability Sensitivity ◽  
Patient Enablement ◽  
Patient Enablement Instrument ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Patient enablement is a core tenet of patient-centred and holistic primary care. The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a transitional measure limited in its ability to measure changes over time. A modified version, PEI-2, has been developed to measure enablement at a given time-point without comparison to a recalled baseline. Objective To assess the validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of PEI-2. Methods PEI-2 was modified from the Chinese PEI to assess enablement over 4 weeks in a prospective cohort study nested within a community support programme [Trekkers Family Enhancement Scheme (TFES)] in Hong Kong. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis and convergent validity by Spearman’s correlations with health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC), responsiveness by 12–24-month change in PEI-2 score and sensitivity by differences in change of PEI-2 score between TFES participants and a control group. Results PEI-2 demonstrated construct validity with all items loading on one factor (factor loadings &gt;0.7). Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations with 12-item Short Form Questionnaire, version 2 (r = 0.1089–0.1919) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r = −0.2030). Internal reliability was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9095) and test–retest reliability moderate (ICC = 0.520, P = 0.506). Significant improvements in PEI-2 scores among the TFES group suggested good responsiveness (P &lt; 0.001). The difference in change of PEI-2 scores between TFES and control was significant (P = 0.008), indicating good sensitivity. Conclusions This study supports the validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of PEI-2 in measuring changes in enablement, making it a promising tool for evaluating enablement in cohort and intervention studies.

Validity, Internal Consistency, and Test/Retest Reliability of a Localization Disabilities and Handicaps Questionnaire

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (08) ◽  
pp. 585-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa N. Ruscetta ◽  
Catherine V. Palmer ◽  
John D. Durrant ◽  
Judith Grayhack ◽  
Carey Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
The Self ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Psychometric evaluations were performed on a self-perceived localization disabilities and handicaps questionnaire. Twenty individuals with normal hearing bilaterally, twenty with profound unilateral hearing impairment (UHI), and ten with any degree of bilateral hearing impairment participated. Each subject completed the questionnaire. Comparisons of the responses of the subjects with normal hearing and those with UHI revealed significant differences among the groups for both disabilities and handicaps, establishing construct validity. Cronbach's Alpha correlational analyses of the responses of all subjects with hearing impairment revealed correlations of .900 (disabilities) and .800 (handicaps), establishing internal consistency. Each participant with hearing impairment was asked to complete the questionnaire again after three weeks. Pearson's correlational analyses of the responses at time one versus time two revealed correlations of .900 (disabilities) and .700 (handicaps), establishing test/retest reliability. This questionnaire is an appropriate tool for investigating the self-perceived localization disabilities and handicaps of individuals with hearing impairment.

The validity and reliability of the Sense of Coherence scale among Indian university students

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gururaghavendran Rajesh ◽  
Monica Eriksson ◽  
Keshava Pai ◽  
S Seemanthini ◽  
Dilip G. Naik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Sense Of Coherence ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Indian Context ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: The importance of salutogenesis, with the focus of what creates health rather than what causes diseases, has been highlighted for a long time. This has been operationalized by Aaron Antonovsky as the Sense of Coherence (SOC-13) scale. The aim of this study was to further examine the psychometric properties of the SOC-13 in India. Methods: The present study was carried out among second-year degree students at three randomly chosen institutions at Mangalore University. Investigators assessed the appropriateness, relevance, comprehensiveness and understandability of the scale. Further, the scale was assessed by five subject experts. The SOC-13 was then pretested by administering it to peers, individuals and a few of the study subjects. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha and split-half reliability. Test-retest reliability was assessed by administering the instrument to the same study participants after two weeks. Confirmatory factor analysis employing varimax rotation was employed. Results: The SOC-13 revealed a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.76. Split-half reliability and Guttman split-half reliability were found to be 0.71 and 0.70, respectively. Test-retest reliability was found to be 0.71 ( p < 0.01). Factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution explaining 40.53% of the variation in SOC. Conclusions: SOC-13 was found to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring SOC in an Indian context. The present study contributes to health promotion in an Indian context, and could be useful even in other developing countries and for further research in India.

scholarly journals Hitting The Bullseye: The Psychometric Properties of the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-Scale in The Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Claessens ◽  
Esther A. Boudewijns ◽  
Lotte C.E.M. Keijsers ◽  
Annerika H.M. Gidding-Slok ◽  
Bjorn Winkens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Chronic conditions impose a major impact on quality of life and on healthcare. The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC-)tool was developed to improve experienced quality of care and quality of life by facilitating shared decision-making and self-management. It assesses the experienced burden of one or multiple conditions, and visualises and integrates the burden in daily care. However, its scale’s validity and reliability are yet unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the ABCC-scale is valid and reliable in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma, or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Methods The Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the Standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-S), and the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire (ADDQoL19) were compared to the ABCC-scale to assess convergent validity. Convergent validity was assumed when at least 75% of the postulated correlations were higher than 0.7, or between 0.3 and 0.7 for single-item subscales. To measure known-group validity, participants were categorized according to exacerbation status, depression, asthma control, insulin dependence, complications and obesity. The ABCC-scale was deemed internally consistency upon a Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.90 for the total scale, and ≥ 0.70 for subscales. Test-retest reliability was evaluated at a two-week interval. Results A total of 65, 62, and 60 people with COPD, asthma, T2DM respectively were included. The ABCC-scale correlated, in accordance with hypotheses, with the SGRQ (75%), AQLQ-S (100%), and ADDQoL19 (75%). Differentiation of known-groups based on the ABCC-scale was possible for all specified groups. The total score and subscores of the ABCC-scale were internally consistent with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90, 0.92, and 0.91 for the total score for people with COPD, asthma, and T2DM respectively. The ABCC-scale had a good test-retest reliability with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.95, 0.93, and 0.95 for people with COPD, asthma and T2DM respectively. Conclusions The ABCC-scale is a valid and reliable questionnaire that can be used within the ABCC-tool for people with COPD, asthma or T2DM. Future research should indicate whether this also applies to people with multimorbidity, and what the effects and experiences are upon clinical use.

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire Version 2 (AWQV2) in Patients with Methamphetamine-Type Substance Use Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Farnia ◽  
Mehdi Moradinazar ◽  
Nasrin Abdoli ◽  
Mostafa Alikhani ◽  
Mansour Rezaei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Persian Version ◽  
Amphetamine Withdrawal ◽  
Questionnaire Version ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: No standard self-report instrument for withdrawal symptoms is available in Iran. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the 10-item Amphetamine Withdrawal questionnaire version 2 (AWQV2). Methods: A sample of 388 methamphetamine addicts (215 females and 173 males) referred to addiction recovery centers and psychiatric ward of Farabi Hospital in Kermanshah. A two-stage random sampling method was used. The reliability and internal consistency of the AWQV2 items were examined using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability, respectively, and the instrument validity of the AWQV2 was measured using construct validity and convergent validity. Results: The AWQV2 had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72. Factor analysis using the main component analysis with a varimax rotation introduced three factors of hyperarousal, anxiety, and reversed vegetative symptoms. These factors explained 0.58 of the total variance. The coefficient of test-retest reliability at a 2-week interval was equal to 0.77. The convergent validity of the AWQV2 was examined by simultaneously administering the Advanced Warning of Relapse (AWARE) questionnaire to 40 subjects, with a correlation coefficient of 0.81. Conclusions: Based on the results, the AWQV2 has very good psychometric properties and may be used in research and therapeutic interventions.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese versions of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in Singapore

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Long ◽  
Yin Bun Cheung ◽  
Debra Qu ◽  
Katherine Lim ◽  
Guozhang Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract Context: Measurement of patient-centred outcomes enables clinicians to focus on patient and family priorities and enables quality of palliative care to be assessed.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese IPOS among advanced cancer patients in Singapore.Methods: IPOS was forward and backward translated from English into Chinese. Structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis; known-group validity by comparing inpatients and community patients; construct validity by correlating IPOS with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G); internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha; inter-rater reliability between patient and staff responses; test-retest reliability of patient responses between two timepoints.Results: 111 English-responding and 109 Chinese-responding patients participated. The three-factor structure (Physical Symptoms, Emotional Symptoms and Communication and Practical Issues) was confirmed with Comparative Fit Index and Tucker-Lewis-Index > 0.9 and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation < 0.08. Inpatients scored higher than outpatients as hypothesised. Construct validity (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r≥|0.608|) was shown between the related subscales of IPOS and FACT-G and ESAS-r. Internal consistency was confirmed for total and subscale scores (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.84), except for the Communication and Practical Issues subscale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.29–0.65). Inter-rater reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≤ 0.43) between patient and staff responses was insufficient. Test-retest reliability was confirmed with Intra-class correlation coefficient ICC = 0.80 (English) and 0.88 (Chinese) for IPOS Total.Conclusion: IPOS in English and Chinese showed good validity, good internal consistency, and good test-retest reliability, except for the Communication and Practical Issues subscale. There was poor inter-rater reliability between patients and staff.

Νέες τεχνολογίες και μαθησιακός τύπος φοιτητών/τριών στη νοσηλευτική επιστήμη

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ελένη Χριστοδούλου
Keyword(s):  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Εισαγωγή: Πολλές μελέτες τονίζουν ότι οι αναδυόμενες νέες τεχνολογίες αποτελούν κομβικό σημείο στις ζωές των σύγχρονων νέων, με πιθανή επίδραση στον τρόπο που αυτοί επικοινωνούν, κοινωνικοποιούνται και μαθαίνουν. Οι σημερινοί φοιτητές, οι επονομαζόμενοι «ψηφιακή γενιά» ή «millennials», χαρακτηρίζονται ως τεχνολογικά ικανοί, με συγκεκριμένα χαρακτηριστικά που επηρεάζουν και διαμορφώνουν τις μαθησιακές τους προτιμήσεις. Πρόκειται για μια γενιά – αίνιγμα και αναμφισβήτητα αποτελεί πρόκληση για την τριτοβάθμια νοσηλευτική εκπαίδευση. Σκοπός αυτής της μελέτης ήταν η σκιαγράφηση του μαθησιακού τύπου των φοιτητών- τριών στην τριτοβάθμια νοσηλευτική εκπαίδευση, όπως αυτός διαμορφώνεται από τη χρήση των νέων τεχνολογιών. Μεθοδολογία: Πρόκειται για μια περιγραφική μελέτη συσχέτισης. Μοιράστηκαν 760 ερωτηματολόγια σε φοιτητές και φοιτήτριες της Νοσηλευτικής τριών τριτοβάθμιων εκπαιδευτικών ιδρυμάτων, από τα οποία απαντήθηκαν τα 720 (ποσοστό απαντητικότητας: 94,7%). Η διαδικασία συλλογής των δεδομένων πραγματοποιήθηκε κατά τους μήνες Φεβρουάριο, Μάρτιο και Απρίλιο του έτους 2015. Αναπτύχθηκε ερευνητικό εργαλείο, βασισμένο στην ανασκόπηση της βιβλιογραφίας, χωρισμένο σε δυο κύριες ενότητες. Η πρώτη αφορούσε στην τεχνολογική ικανότητα και η δεύτερη στις μαθησιακές προτιμήσεις των φοιτητών και φοιτητριών. Πριν τη συλλογή των δεδομένων, έγινε έλεγχος αξιοπιστίας και εγκυρότητας του ερωτηματολογίου με τη μεθοδολογία των επαναληπτικών μετρήσεων (Test – Retest Reliability), σε ομάδα εθελοντών (n=136). Ελέγχθηκε ο συντελεστής Ενδοταξικής Συσχέτισης (ICC) και ο δείκτης Εσωτερικής Συνάφειας (Cronbach’s alpha). Η ανάλυση των δεδομένων πραγματοποιήθηκε με το IBM SPSS 21.0.Αποτελέσματα: Συνολικά, οι συμμετέχοντες ήταν περισσότερες γυναίκες από ό, τι άντρες. Η μέση ηλικία ήταν τα 21,5 (5,3)α έτη, και έτσι συγκαταλέγονται στη ψηφιακή γενιά, σύμφωνα με το ηλικιακό κριτήριο. Οι φοιτητές εμφάνισαν σχεδόν καθολική πρόσβαση σε «έξυπνα κινητά», χρήση ηλεκτρονικού υπολογιστή και πρόσβαση στο διαδίκτυο. Μόνον, το 7,8% ανέφερε ότι δεν είναι ικανός χρήστης του υπολογιστή. Το 58,5% των ερωτηθέντων φοιτητών ανέφερε ότι δε γνωρίζει πως να εντοπίσει ένα αρχείο podcast και το 55,4% δεν είχε χρησιμοποιήσει ποτέ ένα wiki. Οι δημοφιλείς ιστοχώροι κοινωνικής δικτύωσης αποτελούν αξιοσημείωτη εξαίρεση. Η ψηφιακή ικανότητα βρέθηκε ότι σχετίζεται κυρίως με την ηλικία πρώτης χρήσης του διαδικτύου (p<0,001). Σε αντίθεση με ό, τι αναφέρθηκαν για τη χρήση των Web 2.0 εργαλείων για προσωπικούς λόγους, ένα σημαντικό ποσοστό φοιτητών ανέφεραν ότι χρησιμοποιούν τις αναδυόμενες τεχνολογίες για εκπαιδευτικούς σκοπούς. Οι τεχνικές με τις υψηλότερες βαθμολογίες προτίμησης ήταν η διαδραστική διάλεξη (74,6%), η διάλεξη (69,4%) και η συζήτηση (67,1%). Η στάση τους απέναντι στην ενσωμάτωση των νέων τεχνολογιών στην εκπαιδευτική διαδικασία συσχετίζεται με την τεχνολογική τους ικανότητα (p<0,001). Συμπεράσματα: Η σχέση των φοιτητών της νοσηλευτικής με την τεχνολογία είναι περίπλοκη. Αναγνωρίζουν τη σημασία των νέων τεχνολογιών και έχουν θετική στάση στην προοπτική ενσωμάτωσής τους στο πρόγραμμα σπουδών τους, παρόλα αυτά χρειάζονται καθοδήγηση και ενθάρρυνση για την καλύτερη αξιοποίησή τους στις σπουδές τους. Οι σύγχρονοι φοιτητές προτιμούν τη μεικτή μάθηση, με έναν ισοδύναμο συνδυασμό παραδοσιακών και τεχνολογικά προσανατολισμένων μεθόδων μάθησης.

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of Breast Cancer and Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Cachero-Rodriguez ◽  
Alvaro Menéndez-Aller ◽  
María del Mar Fernandez-Alvarez ◽  
Ana Llaneza-Folgueras ◽  
Mei Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Symptom Experience ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Discriminant Power

Abstract This study was designed to adapt the Breast Cancer and Lymphedema Symptoms Experience Index (BCLE-SEI) to the Spanish language (BCLE-SEI-Es) and to assess its psychometric properties in Spanish-speaking women diagnosed with breast cancer. 286 breast cancer survivors were recruited. Study measured demographic and medical data and the BCLE-SEI. Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability (n = 29) after an interval of two weeks. A robust principal components analysis was conducted to explore the dimensions of each BCLE-SEI-Es subtest. Discriminant power of the BCLE-SEI was assessed through a non-parametric test evaluating score differences between non-lymphedema and lymphedema patients. A cut-off point was established via a ROC curve. Cronbach’s alpha: all scales had a value above 0.9. Test-retest reliability: Correlations between questionnaire administrations were above 0.7. The first and second subtests showed a good fit to a unidimensional and two-factor structure, respectively. Lymphedema patients score significantly higher in all BCLE-SEI scales (p < 0.001). A cut-off point was established to predict a possible lymphedema case. The BCLE-SEI-Es is a valid, reliable tool for assessing and identifying the presence of lymphedema among breast cancer survivors and assessing its impact on the physical, functional, psychological and emotional aspects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document