ICIS 2017 Panel Report: Break Your Shackles! Emancipating Information Systems from the Tyranny of Peer Review

2018 ◽  
pp. 442-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecil Eng Huang Chua ◽  
Jason Bennett Thatcher ◽  
Fred Niederman ◽  
Yolande E. Chan ◽  
Elizabeth J. Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Panel Report

scholarly journals ICIS 2008 Panel Report: Design Science in Information Systems: Hegemony, Bandwagon, or New Wave?

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Land ◽  
Claudia Loebbecke ◽  
Albert A. Angehrn ◽  
Eric K. Clemons ◽  
Alan R. Hevner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Design Science ◽  
New Wave ◽  
Panel Report ◽  
Report Design

scholarly journals Students' Peer-Review in Modelling Exercises

10.28945/2632 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guttorm Sindre ◽  
Daniel Moody ◽  
Terje Brasethvik ◽  
Arne Solvberg
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Peer Reviews

This paper reports on the 2002 experiences with students’ peer-review of modeling exercises in a third year Information Systems course. While the peer-reviews did yield some positive and promising results, there were also some problems, and the goals set when introducing peer reviews were not fully achieved. Based on an analysis of student performance and perceptions, main causes for the problems were found to be lacking student motivation combined with unclear demands from teaching staff. For the 2003 offering of the course, the peer review process has been changed to remedy these problems, and this seems to have improved the learning experience for the students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document