scholarly journals Maturity Models in Information Systems Research: Literature Search and Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Poeppelbuss ◽  
Björn Niehaves ◽  
Alexander Simons ◽  
Jörg Becker
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research

Beyond Models of National Culture in Information Systems Research

2011 ◽  
pp. 14-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Myers ◽  
Felix B. Tan
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
National Culture ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Global Organizations ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Dynamic View ◽  
Information Systems Research

Many IS scholars argue that global organizations need to understand cultural differences if they are to successfully deploy information technology. We agree that an understanding of cultural differences is important, but suggest that the concept of “national culture” that has tended to dominate the IS research literature is too simplistic. In this article, we challenge information systems researchers to go beyond models of national culture. We propose that IS researchers should adopt a more dynamic view of culture – one that sees culture as contested, temporal and emergent.

A Review of Ethical Issue Considerations in the Information Systems Research Literature

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Paradice ◽  
David Freeman ◽  
Jianliang Hao ◽  
Joonghee Lee ◽  
Dianne Hall
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Ethical Issue ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research

Beyond Models of National Culture in Information Systems Research

2011 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Myers ◽  
Felix B. Tan
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
National Culture ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Global Organizations ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Dynamic View ◽  
Information Systems Research

Many IS scholars argue that global organizations need to understand cultural differences if they are to successfully deploy information technology. We agree that an understanding of cultural differences is important, but suggest that the concept of “national culture” that has tended to dominate the IS research literature is too simplistic. In this article, we challenge information systems researchers to go beyond models of national culture. We propose that IS researchers should adopt a more dynamic view of culture – one that sees culture as contested, temporal and emergent.

A Review of Ethical Issue Considerations in the Information Systems Research Literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Paradice ◽  
David Freeman ◽  
Jianliang Hao ◽  
Joonghee Lee ◽  
Dianne Hall
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Ethical Issue ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research

A Bridge Too Far?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte P. Lee ◽  
Kjeld Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Science And Technology Studies ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cooperative Work ◽  
Computer Supported Cooperative Work ◽  
Practical Action ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Infrastructures ◽  
Information Systems Research ◽  
Critical Investigation

The study of computing infrastructures has grown significantly due to the rapid proliferation and ubiquity of large-scale IT-based installations. At the same time, recognition has also grown of the usefulness of such studies as a means for understanding computing infrastructures as material complements of practical action. Subsequently the concept of “infrastructure” (or “information infrastructures,” “cyberinfrastructures,” and “infrastructuring”) has gained increasing importance in the area of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) as well as in neighboring areas such as Information Systems research (IS) and Science and Technology Studies (STS). However, as such studies have unfolded, the very concept of “infrastructure” is being applied in different discourses, for different purposes, in myriad different senses. Consequently, the concept of “infrastructure” has become increasingly muddled and needs clarification. The chapter presents a critical investigation of the vicissitudes of the concept of “infrastructure” over the last 35 years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document