scholarly journals Graduate Students’ Construction of Researcher Identities Explored Through Discourse Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Amelia Davis ◽  
Jessica N. Lester

While many research methods courses challenge students to make sense of their own researcher identities as they relate to research paradigms and perspectives, there is a lack of research that examines how students actually go about constructing theses identities, particularly at the level of discourse. In this study, we attended to graduate students’ talk in an introductory research methods course, taking note of how students used particular discursive resources to construct a research identity in online classroom discussions. We analyzed 93 discussion posts students were asked to make in response to a discussion board prompt after completing assigned readings related to research paradigms and researcher identity. We identified two discursive patterns through our analysis: 1) minimizing knowledge, and 2) justifying paradigmatic orientations. Our findings highlight how being asked to talk about one’s research identity is a potentially fragile task, as evidenced by disclaimers of ‘knowing’, and one that evokes justifications and connections to students’ everyday lives. We highlight implications for the teaching of research methodology, particularly qualitative methods courses.

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
C. Amelia Davis ◽  
Jessica N. Lester

While many research methods courses challenge students to make sense of their own researcher identities as they relate to research paradigms and perspectives, there is a lack of research that examines how students actually go about constructing theses identities, particularly at the level of discourse. In this study, we attended to graduate students’ talk in an introductory research methods course, taking note of how students used particular discursive resources to construct a research identity in online classroom discussions. We analyzed 93 discussion posts students were asked to make in response to a discussion board prompt after completing assigned readings related to research paradigms and researcher identity. We identified two discursive patterns through our analysis: 1) minimizing knowledge, and 2) justifying paradigmatic orientations. Our findings highlight how being asked to talk about one’s research identity is a potentially fragile task, as evidenced by disclaimers of ‘knowing’, and one that evokes justifications and connections to students’ everyday lives. We highlight implications for the teaching of research methodology, particularly qualitative methods courses.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalyn Stoa ◽  
Tsz Lun Chu ◽  
Regan A. R. Gurung

Identifying impediments to learning can help both instructors and students. In this study students (N ¼ 222) from across the nationlisted concepts from research methods they found the most challenging—“potholes” or impediments to learning, and also ratedthe difficulty of various concepts from the class. We also measured student attitudes and perceptions of the course. Our resultsshowed validity is one of the hardest concepts for students to understand in RM. Not surprisingly, within a list of concepts inresearch methods, students tend to be tripped up by terms of similar grouping. Perceptions of a research methods course wasstrongly related to the students’ attitudes and canonical correlation analysis revealed several important findings from our data set.For example, we found that when students perceive more value, expectancy for success, cognitive strategies, and resourcesmanagement strategies, they are less likely to be challenged by the concepts of samples and variables and threats to internalvalidity. Our findings provide a clear map of student potholes in research methods courses and suggest ways to change studentattitudes about the same.


Author(s):  
Anna CohenMiller ◽  
Nurlygul Smat ◽  
Aisulu Yenikeyeva ◽  
Kuralay Yassinova

Research methods courses can provide essential opportunities for graduate students to develop themselves as researchers. This article offers insights into the application of creative pedagogy and praxis for a graduate-level qualitative research methods class. Students learned and applied the innovative research method—gender audit as process and method—to understand the gendered nature of University social media accounts. Applying principles of collaborative learning and hands-on practice, students gained confidence in themselves as researchers while examining a contemporary issue affecting higher education institutions.


2020 ◽  
pp. 109442812098004
Author(s):  
Sebnem Cilesiz ◽  
Thomas Greckhamer

Trends toward convergence on common methodologies and standardized templates restrict the diversity of qualitative methods in organizational research. Considering that graduate education is a critical process in the socialization of researchers into the norms and dominant practices of their discipline, graduate students’ socialization into research methodologies is vital for understanding methodological convergence. The purpose of our study was to understand how graduate students’ socialization shapes their methodological and paradigmatic preferences. Showcasing methodological bricolage as an alternative to qualitative templates, we constructed a research design that combined thematic, discourse, and narrative analyses to investigate graduate students’ reflections throughout a qualitative methods course introducing alternative research paradigms. Our findings highlight the role of institutional, disciplinary, and personal influences as well as identity work in researchers’ socialization and trace alternative trajectories by which socialization and methodological identity construction processes may unfold. We offer a sketch of methodological socialization and suggest that its understanding should be central to nurturing paradigmatic and methodological plurality in qualitative research. We conclude with implications for future research and for research methods training.


Author(s):  
Charles Coleman ◽  
Cynthia Conrad

The authors of this study endeavor to explore the negative opinions and perceptions of graduate students in business and social science programs, regarding their required statistics and research methods courses. The general sense of instructors of such courses is that students dread and resent having to take courses dealing with statistics and social research because they are both intellectually demanding and require students to call on mathematics skills. Students also seem to put a low value on such courses in terms of application to their own careers.  Clearly, the above-mentioned perceptions derive from intuitive knowledge and anecdotal statements by students. The authors of this study devised a research design to test the validity of the perceptions of negative attitudes among students in their graduate programs and to gain some understanding of the basis of the negativity.


1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie ◽  
Christine E. Daley

This study investigated whether students with learning styles similar to those of their instructor tended to have higher achievement than students who did not. Participants were 137 graduate students from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds, enrolled in an educational research methodology course. Analysis indicated that students who were most similar in (earning style to their instructor with respect to persistence orientation, peer orientation, auditory preference, and multiple perceptual preferences tended to obtain higher scores on (1) evaluating research articles, (2) writing research proposals, and (3) conceptual knowledge. Recommendations for research include investigating the bases for such relationships.


1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
William J. Froming

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document