scholarly journals SOME FEATURES OF THE CREATION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (№12 2020) ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
A.N. Chernichenko ◽  
L.L. Chernichenko ◽  
E.Y. Shumilova ◽  
O.N. Shevtsova
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Management Information Systems ◽  
Enterprise Management ◽  
Management Information ◽  
Foreign Enterprise ◽  
The Creation

scholarly journals Solution of integration tasks in enterprise management information systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Valerij Vahrushev ◽  
Elena Bogomolova ◽  
Anna Lanskih ◽  
Yurij Lanskih ◽  
Andrej Luppov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Management Information Systems ◽  
Enterprise Management ◽  
Management Information

scholarly journals ANALISYS OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR TRADE ENTERPRISES

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Олександр Білоцерківський ◽  
Катерина Кочіна
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Management Information Systems ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Customer Relationship ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Enterprise Management ◽  
Management Information ◽  
Expert Opinions

The analysis of management information systems for trade enterprises in Ukraine is considered. The process of a trade enterprise management determines the need to use information systems and technologies. However, the level of information support for Ukrainian trade enterprises remains very low because only 6 % of them actively used systems for customer relationship management. Therefore, the analysis and reasonable selecting of management information systems for trade enterprises is relevant and has practical importance. Analysis of the problem showed that researchers used two ways. The first one is to develop the own information systems. The second one is to use existing systems. The purpose of the article is a comparative analysis of management information systems for trade enterprises and their selection based on rating evaluation. Based on the method of analogy, a methodology for rating evaluation of information systems has been proposed. To check the consistency of expert opinion on the rating of information systems, an expert method was used. Kendall coefficient of concordance has been calculated. A comparative analysis of four information systems such as Bitrix24, Bpm'online, AmoCRM, Megaplan was carried out. Based on the survey, they were selected by fifteen signs. It is determined that the information systems such as bpm online and Bitrix24 have the highest ratings. There have been considered their functionality. Similar results were obtained for six information systems including Megaplan, bpm'online sales, Bitrix24, Amo CRM, 1C and Mango. The consistency degree of expert opinions on the rating of four information systems such as bpm'online sales, Bitrix24, AmoCRM and Megaplan is determined by the expert method. The value of Kendall concordance coefficient of 0.86 indicates a strong consistency of expert opinion, which confirms the preliminary calculations. So, information systems are arranged in the following order: bpm online ranks first, Bitrix24 ranks second, AmoCRM ranks third and Megaplan comes fourth. Thus, according to the results of the rating, the solution of the company Terrasoft «Bpm'online» is the most suitable for satisfying our needs.

scholarly journals The Current State of Resource Planning and Enterprise Management Information Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
K A Vasilyev
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Management Information Systems ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Enterprise Management ◽  
Management Information ◽  
Current State

Статья посвящена современному состоянию развития информационных систем планирования ресурсов и управления предприятием. Рассказывается о развитии методологий управления предприятием с помощью программно-инструментальных средств. Затрагивается тема эволюции методологий, с помощью которых автоматизируется деятельность предприятия, а именно: «Планирование потребностей в материалах», «Планирование производственных мощностей», «Планирование производственных ресурсов», «Планирование ресурсов предприятия, синхронизированное с запросами потребителя». Рассматриваются самые распространенные на российском рынке информационные системы планирования ресурсов и управления крупным предприятием, такие как «1C:Предприятие», Microsoft Dynamics AX, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, Sage ERP. Кроме того, автором рассмотрены системы более подходящие для автоматизации деятельности предприятий малого и среднего бизнеса, такие как Microsoft Dynamics NAV, «Галактика ERP», «Парус-Предприятие», Epicor iScala, КАС «Бизнес-Люкс». При рассмотрении каждой из перечисленных систем упоминаются отрасли, в которых данные системы используются, стоимости лицензий, функциональность, используемые системы управлении базами данных. а также самые известные на российском рынке предприятия, на которых внедрены и используются рассматриваемые в статье системы планирования ресурсов и управления предприятием.

Trust in Management Information Systems (MIS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Meeßen ◽  
Meinald T. Thielsch ◽  
Guido Hertel
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Information Overload ◽  
Management Information Systems ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Management Information ◽  
Trust In Management ◽  
Actual Use ◽  
Trust In Technology ◽  
The Internet Of Things

Abstract. Digitalization, enhanced storage capacities, and the Internet of Things increase the volume of data in modern organizations. To process and make use of these data and to avoid information overload, management information systems (MIS) are introduced that collect, process, and analyze relevant data. However, a precondition for the application of MIS is that users trust them. Extending accounts of trust in automation and trust in technology, we introduce a new model of trust in MIS that addresses the conceptual ambiguities of existing conceptualizations of trust and integrates initial empirical work in this field. In doing so, we differentiate between perceived trustworthiness of an MIS, experienced trust in an MIS, intentions to use an MIS, and actual use of an MIS. Moreover, we consider users’ perceived risks and contextual factors (e. g., autonomy at work) as moderators. The introduced model offers guidelines for future research and initial suggestions to foster trust-based MIS use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document