Protocol : Cement augmentation of internal fixation for trochanteric fracture: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis v5 (protocols.io.bkdkks4w)

protocols.io ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norio Yamamoto ◽  
Takahisa Ogawa ◽  
Masahiro Banno ◽  
Jun Watanabe ◽  
Tomoyuki Noda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Cement Augmentation

Comparison of immobilization periods following open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah A. Ghaddaf ◽  
Ahmed S. Abdulhamid ◽  
Mohammed S. Alomari ◽  
Mohammed S. Alquhaibi ◽  
Abdulaziz A. Alshehri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Radius Fracture

scholarly journals Comparison of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis and Open Reduction Internal Fixation on Proximal Humeral Fracture in Elder Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhao ◽  
Yuhui Zhang ◽  
Dongni Johansson ◽  
Xingyu Chen ◽  
Fang Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Humeral Fracture ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Elder Patients

Objective. The study aims to compare minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in elder patients. Method. PubMed, Medline, EMbase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals were searched to identify all relevant studies from inception to October 2016. Data were analyzed with Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manage 5.2. Results. A total of 630 patients from 8 publications were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that MIPO was superior to ORIF in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture in elder patients. It was reflected in reducing blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, or fracture healing time of the surgery and in improving recovery of muscle strength. Concerning complications, no significant difference was seen between MIPO and ORIF. Conclusion. The MIPO was more suitable than ORIF for treating proximal humeral fracture in elder patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document