scholarly journals MojoSort™ Human CD14+ Monocyte Isolation Kit Column Protocol v2 (protocols.io.bbwaipae)

protocols.io ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Li
Keyword(s):  
Monocyte Isolation

scholarly journals Monocyte isolation techniques significantly impact the phenotype of both isolated monocytes and derived macrophages in vitro

Immunology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene C. Nielsen ◽  
Morten N. Andersen ◽  
Holger J. Møller
Keyword(s):  
Isolation Techniques ◽  
Monocyte Isolation

scholarly journals Human monocyte isolation methods influence cytokine production from in vitro generated dendritic cells

Immunology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Elkord ◽  
Paul E. Williams ◽  
Howard Kynaston ◽  
Anthony W. Rowbottom
Keyword(s):  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Cytokine Production ◽  
Human Monocyte ◽  
Isolation Methods ◽  
Monocyte Isolation

scholarly journals CD14-Dependent Monocyte Isolation Enhances Phagocytosis of Listeria monocytogenes by Proinflammatory, GM-CSF-Derived Macrophages

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e66898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Neu ◽  
Anne Sedlag ◽  
Carina Bayer ◽  
Sabine Förster ◽  
Peter Crauwels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Monocyte Isolation

scholarly journals Tissue Factor mRNA Quantitation without Prior Monocyte Isolation

BioTechniques ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1116-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Javorschi ◽  
Sylvie Labrouche ◽  
Genviève Freyburger
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Factor ◽  
Mrna Quantitation ◽  
Monocyte Isolation

scholarly journals Impact of Human Granulocyte and Monocyte Isolation Procedures on Functional Studies

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1065-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhou ◽  
Rajesh Somasundaram ◽  
Rosa F. Nederhof ◽  
Gerard Dijkstra ◽  
Klaas Nico Faber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Selection ◽  
Gradient Centrifugation ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Cell Surface Receptor ◽  
Magnetic Microbeads ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Functional Studies ◽  
Ficoll Density Gradient Centrifugation ◽  
Surface Receptor ◽  
Monocyte Isolation

ABSTRACTOne of the first lines of defense against infection is the activation of the innate immune system. It is becoming clear that autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease, may be caused by disturbed innate immunity, and relating granulocyte and monocyte functions to the patient genotype has become an important part of contemporary research. Although it is essential to move this field forward, a systematic study comparing the efficacy and suitability for functional studies of the various available protocols for the isolation of these immune cells has not been performed. Here, we compare human granulocyte functionality under three enrichment protocols: (i) Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, (ii) anti-CD15 antibody-conjugated microbeads (positive selection), and (iii) Polymorphoprep. Primary monocytes were isolated in parallel using (i) anti-CD14 magnetic microbeads, (ii) non-monocyte depletion by antibody-conjugated magnetic microbeads (negative selection), (iii) RosetteSep antibody cocktail, and (iv) the classical adherence protocol. The best results in terms of purity and cell functionality were obtained with positive selection by magnetic microbeads for both human granulocytes and monocytes. Whereas phagocytosis ofEscherichia colibacteria was identical in all isolation procedures tested, the granulocyte respiratory burst was higher in positively selected cells. In addition, different granulocyte enrichment procedures affect cell surface receptor expression to different extents.In toto, we propose that positive selection of granulocytes and monocytes be adopted as the procedure of choice for studies of human granulocyte and monocyte functions but caution investigators to be aware of possible alterations in cell phenotypes with different isolation procedures.

scholarly journals An Unbiased Flow Cytometry-Based Approach to Assess Subset-Specific Circulating Monocyte Activation and Cytokine Profile in Whole Blood

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurij Kiefer ◽  
Johannes Zeller ◽  
Balázs Bogner ◽  
Isabel A. Hörbrand ◽  
Friederike Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Cell Isolation ◽  
Blood Monocytes ◽  
Isolation And Purification ◽  
Current State ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Monocyte Isolation

Monocytes are the third most frequent type of leukocytes in humans, linking innate and adaptive immunity and are critical drivers in many inflammatory diseases. Based on the differential expression of surface antigens, three monocytic subpopulations have been suggested in humans and two in rats with varying inflammatory and phenotype characteristics. Potential intervention strategies that aim to manipulate these cells require an in-depth understanding of monocyte behavior under different conditions. However, monocytes are highly sensitive to their specific activation state and expression of surface markers, which can change during cell isolation and purification. Thus, there is an urgent need for an unbiased functional analysis of activation in monocyte subtypes, which is not affected by the isolation procedure. Here, we present a flow cytometry-based protocol for evaluating subset-specific activation and cytokine expression of circulating blood monocytes both in humans and rats using small whole blood samples (50 - 100 μL). In contrast to previously described monocyte isolation and flow cytometry visualization methods, the presented approach virtually leaves monocyte subsets in a resting state or fixes them in their current state and allows for an unbiased functional endpoint analysis without prior cell isolation. This protocol is a comprehensive tool for studying differential monocyte regulation in the inflammatory and allogeneic immune response in vitro and vivo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document