Updating the Term Dates of IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) Members

The main purpose of the research is to determine the goals, objectives and functions of administrative supervision and develop proposals for improving the legislation of the Russian Federation regulating issues related to the implementation of administrative supervision. Research methods: general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, logical methods) and private scientific methods of cognition (formally-legally, specifically-sociological etc.). Outcome: the author’s version of the administrative supervision goals and objectives set out in the regulatory documents of the Russian Federation is proposed: 1. Administrative supervision is established to prevent the commission of crimes and other offences by persons. 2. The administrative supervision focuses on implementation by the internal affairs bodies of supervision over the observance by supervised persons of temporary restrictions on their rights and freedoms, as well as over the fulfillment of their duties stipulated by the related federal law; identification of violations by those under the supervision and taking measures in accordance with the law; individual preventive treatment of such persons. The novelty of the study is due to an integrated approach to the research into the goals, objectives and functions of administrative supervision and the developed proposals for improving the Russian legislation regulating issues in that area.

Download Full-text

Multilevel cooperation in the EU resolution of cross-border bank groups: lessons from the non-euro area Member States joining the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM)

Journal of Banking Regulation ◽

10.1057/s41261-021-00160-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Agnieszka Smoleńska

Keyword(s):

Euro Area ◽

Banking Union ◽

Member States ◽

Essential Condition ◽

European Banking Union ◽

Cross Border ◽

Single Resolution Mechanism ◽

European Banking ◽

Administrative Oversight ◽

The Eu

AbstractCross-border banking presents a unique set of challenges in the EU from the perspective of arranging administrative oversight structures. Structuring cooperation between different EU and national authorities in a way which is conducive to trust-building and mutual engagement is an essential condition for overcoming disintegrative tendencies in the internal market. To assess how the existing EU arrangements fare in this regard in the context of EU resolution law, this article comparatively analyses the different models of multilevel administrative cooperation in the post-crisis EU framework. These are specifically the centralised model of the European Banking Union (Single Resolution Mechanism) and the relatively looser networked model of the resolution colleges. The multilevel cooperation under both models is nuanced given the distinct roles of the national resolution authorities, EU agencies and the differentiated status of non-euro area Member States in the EBU (Croatia, Bulgaria). The article’s findings allow to identify specific problems of constitutional nature pertaining to the accountability of administrative cooperation, equality of Member States and the implications of Meroni doctrine’s distortive effects.

Download Full-text

Core Trainees' study budget and study leave: a survey exploring trainees' needs and understanding of local processes in place within the North West

BJPsych Open ◽

10.1192/bjo.2021.439 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (S1) ◽

pp. S157-S158

Author(s):

Chirag Shroff

Keyword(s):

Health Education ◽

Graphical Representation ◽

Committee Meeting ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

North West ◽

The North ◽

Local Board ◽

Oversight Committee ◽

New System

AimsHealth Education England launched a new system for study leave and study budget on 1st April 2018, in response to trainees' concerns regarding the previous system. According to this, Health Education England would manage the study leave budget through its local offices, making the process of accessing study ‘more transparent, equitable and streamlined' for all trainees. At the RAP Oversight Committee meeting of the North West Deanery in 2019, trainees' uncertainties over the process was discussed by the local reps. It was aimed that there was a need to gather information on trainees' needs and understanding of local processes in place by the deanery to access study leave and study budgetMethodA cross sectional survey was sent out to all the trainees by the Core Trainees year 1 RAP rep. A total of 6 relevant questions were designed and sent out to the trainees, allowing them 2 weeks’ time to respond. There were a total of 66 trainees who were sent the survey. The guidance mentioned in the 2016 Gold guide was used for reference to ensure the questions are relevant.ResultOf the total of 66 trainees who were sent the survey, there were 48 respondents. The results indicated that all 48 responders preferred study budget and leave process explained at induction. 47 of 48 respnders sought access to their study budget, 46 of 48 responders sought use of budget for external course and exam fees fudning, 27 of the 48 responders struggled to get study leave and 27 of 48 responders felt the current leave process was not satisfactory with 14 opining that there was scope for improvemement.ConclusionThe responses were collated by the trainee rep as a PowerPoint presentation containing graphical representation of trainees’ views regarding their study leaves and budget access. The survey results were made aware to the local board at the subsequent RAP Oversight Committee meeting to seek response and new guidance. There is a new system in place for study leave and study budgets, overseen by Health Education England. Overall, the survery attempted to understand and collate trainees' wants and needs, in effect improving trainee experiences.

Download Full-text

Using cognitive work analysis to design a continuous quality improvement monitoring system for medical school accreditation

10.32469/10355/67660 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

◽

Lisa A. Royse

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Medical School ◽

Monitoring System ◽

Continuous Quality Improvement ◽

Cognitive Work Analysis ◽

Work Analysis ◽

Continuous Quality ◽

Cognitive Work ◽

Oversight Committee ◽

Information Constraints

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The purpose of this study is to apply phases of Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) to identify human and information constraints in how a medical school tracks and monitors the Liaison Committee of Medical Education (LCME) accreditation elements and use the identified constraints to guide design decisions for development of a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Tracker system that will be used to facilitate the LCME Oversight Committee meetings. The researcher answered the following questions: What do the phases of CWA reveal about system constraints of a LCME CQI monitoring system at a medical school? More specifically, what are the design implications for a system that supports an oversight committee in the continuous monitoring of accreditation elements at a medical school? Direct observations, document review, and interviews with 17 members of the LCME Oversight Committee were conducted. Findings from qualitative analysis of interview transcripts were mapped to three phases of CWA. Findings were then used to create models that allowed the researcher to gain a deep understanding of the human and information constraints to consider when designing an LCME CQI tracking system.

Download Full-text