scholarly journals Analysis of Economic Feasibility of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle(IGCC) as a Next Generation Power Supply in Korea

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-174
Author(s):  
Suduk Kim
2014 ◽  
Vol 981 ◽  
pp. 677-682
Author(s):  
Chuan Sheng Xie ◽  
Chen Chen Zhao ◽  
Peng Yuan Zhong ◽  
Cheng Ying Zhou

Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) is an efficient, low-pollution clean coal power generation technology and efficient use of IGCC technology is helpful to realize clean conversion and comprehensive utilization of coal resources in China. This paper analyzed the factors that influence the power supply efficiency of IGCC power plants, determined assessment model for power supply efficiency of IGCC power plants. Then based on IGCC power plant construction specific data including power supply efficiency, combining the general technical and economic evaluation of the project, the technical and economic evaluation step of IGCC plant was determined. The economic evaluation of IGCC power plant was carried out as well as sensitivity analysis in terms of static total investment, utilization hours and standard coal tax price. The results showed that introduced IGCC of 40 megawatt had higher tariff and utilization hours had maximum impact on tariff.


2020 ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Vontas Alfenny Nahan ◽  
Audrius Bagdanavicius ◽  
Andrew McMullan

In this study a new multi-generation system which generates power (electricity), thermal energy (heating and cooling) and ash for agricultural needs has been developed and analysed. The system consists of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) and an absorption chiller system. The system generates about 3.4 MW electricity, 4.9 MW of heat, 88 kW of cooling and 90 kg/h of ash. The multi-generation system has been modelled using Cycle Tempo and EES. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of this system had been conducted and exergy costs have been calculated. The exergoeconomic study shows that gasifier, combustor, and Heat Recovery Steam Generator are the main components where the total cost rates are the highest. Exergoeconomic variables such as relative cost difference (r) and exergoeconomic factor (f) have also been calculated. Exergoeconomic factor of evaporator, combustor and condenser are 1.3%, 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively, which is considered very low, indicates that the capital cost rates are much lower than the exergy destruction cost rates. It implies that the improvement of these components could be achieved by increasing the capital investment. The exergy cost of electricity produced in the gas turbine and steam turbine is 0.1050 £/kWh and 0.1627 £/kWh, respectively. The cost of ash is 0.0031 £/kg. In some Asian countries, such as Indonesia, ash could be used as fertilizer for agriculture. Heat exergy cost is 0.0619 £/kWh for gasifier and 0.3972 £/kWh for condenser in the BIGCC system. In the AC system, the exergy cost of the heat in the condenser and absorber is about 0.2956 £/kWh and 0.5636 £/kWh, respectively. The exergy cost of cooling in the AC system is 0.4706 £/kWh. This study shows that exergoeconomic analysis is powerful tool for assessing the costs of products.


Author(s):  
S De ◽  
P K Nag

The effect of supplementary firing on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant is studied. The results are presented with respect to a simple ‘unfired’ IGCC power plant with single pressure power generation for both the gas and the steam cycles as reference. The gases are assumed as real with variable specific heats. It is found that the most favourable benefit of supplementary firing can be obtained for a low temperature ratio R T only. For higher R T, only a gain in work output is possible with a reverse effect on the overall efficiency of the plant. The second law analysis reveals that the exergy loss in the heat-recovery steam generator is most significant as the amount of supplementary firing increases. It is also noteworthy that, although the total exergy loss of the plant decreases with higher supplementary firing for a low R T (= 3.0), the reverse is the case for a higher R T (= 6.0).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document