Diagnostic and therapeutic status of haemophilia in Latin America

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Alberto Montaño ◽  
Maria Sol Cruz ◽  
Felipe Lemos ◽  
Alfredo Quiroz ◽  
Gerardo Rojas

Abstract The Latin American net of Prophylaxis and Immune Tolerance (RED LAPI) was established in 2010 and comprises a group of physicians dedicated to improving the diagnosis, treatment and quality of life of haemophilia patients in Latin America. The countries represented at RED LAPI are: Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Honduras, Guatemala, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Ecuador and Panama. Analysis of the provision of care for haemophilia patients suggests a lack of consistent care both across and within Latin America countries. While some patients receive prophylaxis and immune tolerance induction (ITI), others are not even properly diagnosed, due to variation in patient’s health insurance. Few countries in Latin America have a national program that registers all patients’ information. Therefore, in many countries it is difficult to identify local, regional and national data regarding the number of diagnosed patients, type of hemophilia, severity, and the kind of treatment. With respect to patients with inhibitors, some countries rely on bypass agents for the treatment of bleeding episodes while a few are able to do ITI. This paper summarises available data obtained by a survey of RED LAPI members regarding the diagnosis and treatment of haemophilia in their countries, as well as the incidence of inhibitors and the treatments available to patients. Based on this analysis, the aim is to propose plans to improve the current situation of haemophilia patients in Latin America.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5161-5161
Author(s):  
Isaac Odeyemi ◽  
Anne D. Møller

Abstract The aim of this analysis was to estimate the economic impact of bleed control treatments prior to immune tolerance induction (ITI) in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors in Germany. “Poor risk” hemophilia patients presenting at ITI are more costly to manage as they require higher-dose factor VIII treatment over a longer period, compared to “good risk” patients. Thus, factors that improve patient risk status for ITI, and permit the lowering of factor usage during ITI while maintaining clinical efficacy, are expected to result in cost-effective outcomes. The phenomenon of anamnestic response (AR) which occurs following treatment of hemophilia bleeds with immunogenic products results in significant elevation of titer levels, conferring a “poor risk” status on these patients at ITI. We therefore hypothesize that the prevention of AR pre-ITI, by avoiding immunogenic agents, would result in fewer “poor risk” patients requiring high-dose regimen during ITI, resulting in a cost-effective outcome. A cost-minimization model compared two strategies for the management of patients with severe hemophilia A with inhibitors. One strategy involved management of bleeds with a bypassing agent (activated prothrombin complex concentrates; aPCC) prior to ITI, while the other involved management of bleeds by use of a product which does not provoke AR (recombinant activated factor VII; rFVIIa) prior to ITI. Data on resource use and probabilities of clinical outcomes were derived from published literature, and the model validated by clinical experts with experience in managing inhibitor patients. The mean cost of ITI in inhibitor patients previously treated with rFVIIa is €1,073,327 compared to €1,420,825 for patients previously treated with aPCC. The model also estimated the incremental cost attributable to anamnesis in the management of a hemophilia patient who has undergone ITI to be €186,665. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the model is robust to the price of aPCC, but sensitive to the proportion of patients with AR post-aPCC treatment and the cost and dosage of FVIII at ITI. Anamnestic response is an unpredictable but avoidable consequence of managing bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients and confers significant additional costs to the management of high-responding inhibitor patients undergoing ITI. Avoiding AR prior to ITI by managing spontaneous bleeding episodes with bypassing agents which do not provoke AR has the potential for significant cost savings.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5050-5050
Author(s):  
Mark J. Belletrutti ◽  
Roxanne Seiferman-Nelson ◽  
Bonny Granfield

Abstract Introduction: Development of circulating anti-factor VIII antibodies (inhbitors) is the most serious and challenging complication in the treatment of hemophilia A. Up to 38% of hemophilia patients develop inhibitors with recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products (Gouw et al. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:231-239). The presence of inhibitors leads to an increased risk of bleeding, poor physical functioning and quality of life (Benson et al., Eur. J. Haematol. 2012; 88:371-379). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the most common method for eliminating inhibitors, historically performed with high dose, and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived (pd), or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates. Although ITI for the eradication of inhibitors has become standard of care for hemophilia patients the therapeutic superiority of a particular product type (rFVIII vs. pd-FVIII) has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. In accordance with its role in stabilizing FVIII, the presence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in pd-FVIII concentrates has been shown to improve the outcome of ITI. Wilate® (Octapharma) is a high-purity human plasma derived complex containing two proteins (VWF and FVIII) in a 1:1 ratio. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Wilate for primary ITI therapy for six patients with severe hemophilia A. Patients and Methods: The case history for six pediatric hemophilia A patients prior to and during primary Wilate ITI was reviewed. For 5/6 patients, inhibitors developed during rFVIII factor replacement therapy. For the sixth patient, inhibitors were detected at the time of hemophilia diagnosis. ITI began once patients achieved an inhibitor titer of less than 10 BU/mL. The ITI dosing regimen ranged from 50-60 IU/Kg of Wilate three times per week to 200 IU/Kg once daily. Inhibitor titers were measured regularly, prior to and during ITI using the Nijmegen-Bethesda assay. The number of port-a-cath infections and bleeding episodes were also monitored. ITI success was defined as: an undetectable inhibitor level (<0.6 BU/mL), FVIII plasma recovery ≥ 66% of predicted, and FVIII half-life ≥6 hours. Results: Wilate ITI was well tolerated in all patients, with no product-related adverse events. All patients had a port-a-cath device inserted for Wilate injections. Two port-a-cath infections occurred during ITI. Five of six patients had poor prognostic factors for ITI outcome. These poor prognostic factors included a high-risk FVIII gene mutation, historical peak inhibitor titer greater than 50 BU/mL, age of ITI onset greater than 6 years, and ITI onset more than 12 months from inhibitor development. The frequency of these poor prognostic factors varied amongst the patients: 1 patient had 4, 1 patient had 2, and 3 patients presented with 1 poor prognostic factor. Despite the presence of these high-risk factors, Wilate was successful at reducing the inhibitor titers to undetectable levels in all patients. Furthermore, inhibitor titers have remained low or undetectable without significant spikes for the duration of treatment. Patient plasma recovery and FVIII half-life results have also indicated that patients are progressing towards successful ITI. Importantly, for 6/6 patients (including 3 patients who had previously been treated with Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex (FEIBA) prophylaxis therapy) - Wilate therapy was successful at reducing the number of bleeding episodes allowing for the cessation of FEIBA prophylaxis. Since commencing Wilate ITI, 6/6 patients have not reported any major bleeding episodes. The improved clinical outcome was perceived by the patients as an improved well-being, and quality of life. Conclusion: Wilate ITI was found to be well tolerated, safe, and successful at reducing inhibitor levels to below the detectable range for six severe hemophilia A patients. Patients experienced no treatment related adverse events, had a low rate of port-a-cath infections, and did not present with any major bleeding episodes while on Wilate ITI. In light of the 3-5 fold increase in overall treatment costs of immune tolerance induction, careful consideration should be given to choice of product (rFVIII versus pd-FVIII) – especially for patients at high-risk of failure. (Dimichele et al. Haemophilia 2004: 10 Suppl 4;140-145). The present data suggest that Wilate, a pd-FVIII product, is effective in managing patients with inhibitors. Disclosures Belletrutti: Baxter Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring Canada: Honoraria.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 931-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lippi ◽  
Massimo Franchini

SummaryThe development of inhibitors that neutralise the function of factor VIII (FVIII) is currently not only the most challenging complication associated with the treatment of haemophilia A but it also increases the disease-related morbidity as bleeding episodes do not respond to standard therapy. The main short-term goal of the treatment of inhibitor patients is to control bleeding episodes while the long-term one is to permanently eradicate the inhibitor by immune tolerance induction, particularly in the case of high-titer antibodies. Due to some in vitro studies and clinical observations, some investigators have suggested that FVIII concentrates containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) may be less immunogenic than high-purity or recombinant FVIII products. It has also been suggested that success rates for immune tolerance induction are higher when plasma-derived FVIII products are used. The currently available data from laboratory and clinical studies on the role of VWF in inhibitor development and eradication in haemophilia A is critically analysed in this review. As a result, we have not found definitive evidence supporting a role for product type on inhibitor incidence and inhibitor eradication in haemophilia A patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-84
Author(s):  
Paweł Łaguna ◽  
Anna Klukowska ◽  
Jarosław Ćwikła ◽  
Michał Matysiak

AbstractWe present the case of an 18.5-year-old boy with hemophilia A and FVIII inhibitor detected at the age of 8 months. No persistent inhibitor eradication was achieved, despite three attempts of immune tolerance induction (ITI) with temporary inhibitor resolution and subsequent administration of 11 doses of rituximab. In spite of hemostatic treatment, rehabilitation, and radiosynovectomy, the patient suffered from recurrent bleeding episodes into almost all major joints, which resulted in the development of progressive hemophilic arthropathy. Currently, due to high frequency of bleeding episodes, the patient is being treated prophylactically and receives prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC).


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. e355-e358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bulent Zulfikar ◽  
Basak Koc ◽  
Nihal Ozdemir

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 275-276
Author(s):  
Jose Aravena ◽  
Jean Gajardo ◽  
Laura Gitlin

Abstract In a scenario of increasing longevity and social inequalities, Latin-America is an important contributor to the worldwide dementia burden. Caregivers’ health is fundamental to maintain the person with dementia quality of life. However, caregiving is a culturally sensible role that requires tailored solutions. The aim is to synthesize the evidence about non-pharmacologic interventions targeted to caregivers of people with dementia in Latin-American contexts. A comprehensive review of interventions in caregivers and persons with dementia in Latin-American countries was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus with studies published until January 27th, 2020. Randomized clinical trials of non-pharmacologic interventions targeted to caregivers of people with dementia or dyads where included. Qualitative synthesis of the evidence was presented and analyzed. Overall, 9 pilot RCT were included for the final analysis (6 Brazil, 1 Colombia, 1 Mexico, 1 Perú). The biggest study recruited 69 caregivers and the smallest 13 dyads, with follow-up range of 3-6 months. 5 control groups received at least some other non-standard care type of intervention. 8 were targeted exclusively to caregivers (4 group intervention, 3 individual, and 1 combined) and 1 multicomponent intervention. Most frequent measured outcomes were caregiver’s burden, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and quality of life, and person with dementia neuropsychiatric symptoms. Individual interventions report better results in caregiver parameters such as burden and depressive symptoms and person with dementia neuropsychiatric symptoms. Group interventions presented mixed results. Nevertheless, the quality of evidence was low. There is a critical need to study interventions for caregivers in Latin-American contexts.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nongnuch Sirachainan ◽  
Ampaiwan Chuansumrit ◽  
Surapan Parapakpenjune ◽  
Pakawan Wongwerawattanakoon ◽  
Surapong Lertthammakiat ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 142 (4) ◽  
pp. 644-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline M. W. van Helden ◽  
H. Marijke van den Berg ◽  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
Paul H. P. Kaijen ◽  
Marleen G. Zuurveld ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document