scholarly journals Soluble ST2 protein and hospitalizations due to worsening chronic heart failure during a one-year follow-up in a population with reduced ejection fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 931-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Wojtczak-Soska ◽  
Agata Sakowicz ◽  
Tadeusz Pietrucha ◽  
Kamil Janikowski ◽  
Malgorzata Lelonek
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Banach ◽  
Ł. Wołowiec ◽  
D. Rogowicz ◽  
L. Gackowska ◽  
I. Kubiszewska ◽  
...  

Introduction. Procalcitonin (PCT) is an excellent marker of sepsis but was not extensively studied in cardiology. The present study investigated PCT plasma concentration in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and its prognostic value during 24-month follow-up. Material and Methods. Study group consisted of 130 patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 45%) and 32 controls. PCT level was assessed on admission in all patients. Telephone follow-up was performed every three months over a period of 2 years. Endpoints were death of all causes and readmission for HFrEF exacerbation. Results. HFrEF patients had significantly higher PCT concentration than controls (166.95 versus 22.15 pg/ml; p<0.001). Individuals with peripheral oedema had increased PCT comparing to those without oedema (217.07 versus 152.12 pg/ml; p<0.02). In ROC analysis, PCT turned out to be a valuable diagnostic marker of HFrEF (AUC 0.91; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with PCT in the 4th quartile had significantly lower probability of survival than those with PCT in the 1st and 2nd quartiles. In univariate, but not multivariate, analysis, procalcitonin turned out to be a significant predictor of death during 24-month follow-up. (HR 1.002; 95% CI 1.000–1.003; p<0.03). Conclusions. Elevated PCT concentration may serve as another predictor of worse outcome in patients with HFrEF.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1462-1471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Lloyd Dini ◽  
Erberto Carluccio ◽  
Anca Simioniuc ◽  
Paolo Biagioli ◽  
Gianpaolo Reboldi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Justin Ezekowitz ◽  
Robert J. Mentz ◽  
Cynthia M. Westerhout ◽  
Nancy K. Sweitzer ◽  
Michael M. Givertz ◽  
...  

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often target enrollment of patients with demographics and outcomes less representative of the broader population of interest. To provide context for the VICTORIA trial (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction), we designed a registry of hospitalized patients with worsening heart failure to characterize their clinical profile, outcomes, and reasons for their nonparticipation in a RCT. Methods: Fifty-one RCT sites in Canada and the United States participated. Eligible patients included those with chronic heart failure, hospitalized for heart failure, and an ejection fraction <45%; no other exclusions were applied. Sites identified patients between 2017 and 2019 during the RCT enrollment period. RCT eligibility criteria were applied, and non–mutually exclusive reasons for nonenrollment were captured. Mortality at 1 year was estimated via the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score or as observed in the RCT. Results: Overall, 2056 patients were enrolled in the registry; 61% (n=1256) were ineligible for the RCT, 37% (n=766) were eligible but not enrolled, and 2% (n=34) were also enrolled in the RCT. Registry participants had a median age of 70, 33% were women, and 63% were White. The median risk score predicted a 20.9% 1-year mortality, higher than in the RCT (predicted 14.7% and observed 11.5%). Major reasons for ineligibility in the RCT included the use of nitrates (23%), systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg (12%), and substance use (11%) with other exclusion criteria <10%. For eligible patients, reasons for nonparticipation in the RCT included lack of interest in participating (28%), poor compliance (25%), inability to complete follow-up (23%), too sick (20%), unable to provide consent (17%), and distance from site (15%). Conclusions: Patients with worsening heart failure in routine clinical practice exhibit high-risk features, and approximately one-third were eligible for an RCT but excluded. The majority of these nonparticipating patients had modifiable reasons. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02861534.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1574-1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ovidiu Chioncel ◽  
Mitja Lainscak ◽  
Petar M. Seferovic ◽  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
Maria G. Crespo-Leiro ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Igor Zhirov ◽  
Natalia Safronova ◽  
Yulia Osmolovskaya ◽  
Alina Alshevskaya ◽  
Andrey Moskalev ◽  
...  

Background. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are tightly interrelated. The concurrence of these pathologies can aggravate the pathological process. The geographic and ethnic characteristics of patients may significantly affect the efficacy of different types of therapy and patients’ compliance. The objective of this study was to analyze how the features of the course of the diseases and management of HF + AF influence the clinical outcomes. Methods. The data of 1,003 patients from the first Russian register of patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation (RIF-CHF) were analyzed. The endpoints included hospitalization due to HF worsening, mortality, thromboembolic events, and hemorrhage. Predictors of unfavorable outcomes were analyzed separately for patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (AF + HFpEF), midrange ejection fraction (AF + HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (AF + HFrEF). Prevalence of HF + AF and compliance with long-term treatment of this pathology during one year were evaluated for each patient. Results. The study involved 39% AF + HFpEF patients, 15% AF + HFmrEF patients, and 46% AF + HFrEF patients. AF + HFpEF patients were significantly older than patients in two other groups (40.6% of patients were older than ≥75 years vs. 24.8%, respectively, p<0.001) and had the lowest rate of prior myocardial infarctions (25.3% vs. 46.1%, p<0.001) and the lowest adherence to rational therapy of HF (27.4% vs. 47.1%, p<0.001). AF + HFmrEF patients had the highest percentage of cases of HF onset after AF (61.3% vs. 49.2% in other patient groups, p=0.021). Among patients with AF + HFrEF, there was the highest percentage of males (74.2% vs. 41% in other patient groups, p<0.001) and the highest percentage of ever-smokers (51.9% vs. 29.4% in other patient groups, p<0.001). A total of 57.2% of patients were rehospitalized for decompensation of chronic heart failure within one year; the risk was the highest for AF + HFmrEF patients (66%, p=0.017). Reduced ejection fraction was associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (15.5% vs. 5.4% in other patient groups, p<0.001) rather than ischemic stroke (2.4% vs. 3%, p=0.776). Patients with AF + HFpEF had lower risk to achieve the combination point (stroke + IM + CV death) as compared to patients with AF + HFmrEF and AF + HFrEF (12.7% vs. 22% and 25.5%, p<0.001). Regression logistic analysis revealed that factors such as demographic characteristics, disease severity, and administered treatment had different effects on the risk of unfavorable outcomes depending on ejection fraction group. The clinical features and symptoms were found to be significant risk factors of cardiovascular mortality in AF + HFmrEF, while therapy characteristics were not associated with it. Conclusions. Each group of patients with different ejection fractions is characterized by its own pattern of factors associated with the development of unfavorable outcomes. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with midrange ejection fraction demonstrate that these patients need to be studied as a separate cohort.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0168790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana G. Marcondes-Braga ◽  
Guilherme L. Batista ◽  
Ivano G. R. Gutz ◽  
Paulo H. N. Saldiva ◽  
Sandrigo Mangini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document