scholarly journals Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Pathological Vertebral Compression Fractures Secondary to Multiple Myeloma – Medium-Term and Long-Term Assessment of Pain Relief and Quality of Life

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Jurczyszyn ◽  
Ryszard Czepko ◽  
Mariusz Banach ◽  
Bartosz Godlewski ◽  
Przemysław Masłowski ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Pei Zhai

Background. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in older patients, which can cause back pain and even increase morbidity. However, the optimal therapy for patients with OVCFs remains unknown. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), a minimally invasive procedure, has been a therapy option that is known to be effective in the pain management. Aim. The meta-analysis aims to summarize current best evidence on the efficacy of PVP and conservative treatment (CT) for pain management and functional results among OVCFs patients. Methods. We searched the publications on comparison of the efficacy of PVP versus CT for OVCFs patients up to November 2018. After rigorous reviewing on the quality, the data were extracted from eligible trials. All trials analyzed the summary hazard ratios of the endpoints of interest. Results. Moderate-strong evidence indicated that PVP had benefits on pain relief at 1 week and 1 month, but not at 3 months. With regard to the quality of life, no significant differences were found in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). However, there is significant difference in terms of EuroQol and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis but not the RMDQ. Moreover, there were no any benefit in terms of vertebral fracture between groups. Conclusions. The meta-analysis showed that patients treated with vertebroplasty were associated with better pain relief and improved quality of life, without increasing the incidence of vertebral fracture compared with the CT group.


2020 ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Abhay Singh ◽  
Rahul Gupta ◽  
Shachi Shachi

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fracture usually occurs in old age population with osteoporosis. Due to severity of pain, quality of life becomes very poor. During the study period 67 patients fullling the eligibility cri METHODS: teria underwent vertebroplasty/ kyphoplasty/ cement augmented screw xation/ hybrid procedures were included. Short term and long term benets /side effects were evaluated in all patients. Patients were evaluated on visual analogue score and modied ranking scale. RESULTS: Vertebroplasty was performed in 26(38.8%) whereas kyphoplasty, cement augmented screw xation and hybrid procedure were performed in 18(26.8%), 17(25.4%) and 6(9.0%) respectively. Signicant pain relief occurred in all patients which were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale. Quality of life also improved which was evaluated with Modied Rankin Scale. In our study, complications which occurred were local cement leak, hematoma formation, infection in 8 (11.9%), 3(4.5%) and 2(3.0%) patients respectively. Use of biological cement has revolutionized CONCLUSION: the management of vertebral compression fracture. Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures which are minimal invasive, almost cure the non infective pathological fractures with instant pain relief and very low procedure related morbidity. In cases requiring xation, cement augmentation signicantly improves the purchase of the screw and makes the construct more reliable. Hybrid technique helps to prevent extensive long level xation.


2019 ◽  
pp. 455-463
Author(s):  
Mostafa M. Nabeeh ◽  
Hanee A. Awad ◽  
Nabil M. Ali

Introduction: Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive technique in which percutaneous injection of bone cement under fluoroscopic guidance Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been widely and successfully accepted in the treatment of osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures to control pain refractory to medical treatment. However, using of vertebroplasty as primary line treatment for traumatic, non-osteoporotic compression fractures still not widely accepted and considered a debatable issue. Patients and methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at Neurosurgery department, Mansoura university hospital and Mansoura emergency hospital through the period between January 2015 and March 2016. 20 patients complaining of back pain due to single level thoracolumbar vertebral compression non-osteoprotic fractures were admitted to the study. Patients were divided into two groups 10 patients each, PVP group and conservative group. Outcome were assessed as regard pain improvement using Visual analogue scale VAS and quality of life using short form 36 scale (SF36). Results: Ten patients in the PVP group received Vertebroplasty, eight males (80%) and two females (20%) the age ranged from 29 to 62 years with mean age of 44.2+8.3 (mean+SD) years. The conservative group included ten patients seven males (70%) and three females (30%) the age ranged from 31 to 64 years with mean age of 45.1+9.2 (mean+SD) years. The level of injury ranged from D6 to L4. VAS and SF36 results showed significant improvement in post injection results compared to preinjection and to the conservative group Conclusion: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is safe and effective procedure to improve pain and quality of life in non osteoprotic patients complaining of traumatic compression fractures of thoraco-lumar region it decreases pain, and provide early ambulation of patients which improve their quality of life without significant morbidity.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2873-2873 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R Berenson ◽  
Robert Pflugmacher ◽  
Peter Jarzem ◽  
Jeffrey A Zonder ◽  
John B Tillman ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2873 Poster Board II-849 Destructive vertebral lesions are a common source of morbidity for patients with cancer. Balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for patients with painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) with the goal of reducing pain and disability. We report the final results of the first randomized trial among cancer patients with VCFs to assess the efficacy and safety of BKP. Twenty-two multinational sites enrolled 134 patients after consent and ethical review board approval. Adult patients diagnosed with cancer and ' 3 painful VCFs were randomly assigned to BKP or nonsurgical management (NSM) and followed for 12 months. Patients were excluded with primary bone tumors, osteoblastic tumors or solitary plasmacytoma at the fracture site, or spinal cord compression. The primary objective was to determine the change in the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire (RMDQ), a 0- (no disability) to 24-point (maximum disability) instrument validated for assessing back-specific physical functioning, at one month. Following this assessment, cross-over to BKP was allowed in the NSM arm. Patients were randomized to BKP (N=70) or NSM (N=64). Five patients withdrew early from the study without significant baseline data; the 3 patients assigned to BKP did not undergo the procedure. Thus, 68 BKP and 61 control patients were evaluable. Mean patient age was 64 years, 58% were female, and tumor types included multiple myeloma (38%), cancers of the breast (22%), lung (8.5%), prostate (6.2%) and other sites (26%). At baseline, 35% of patients were currently on daily corticosteroids, 50% had received bisphosphonates within 12 months of study entry, 49% had received prior radiation (52 % to the spine), and 67% of patients were previously treated with chemo/hormonal therapies. VCFs were identified in a single (34%), two (26%) or three (40%) sites. Mean baseline RMDQ scores were similar between the groups; 17.6 and 18.2 points for BKP and NSM patients, respectively. However, at one month, there was an improvement for patients randomized to BKP of −8.3 points (95% CI −6.4 to −10.2) whereas those receiving NSM showed no significant change (0.1 points, 95% CI 1.0 to −0.8; p<0.0001). At one week, BKP-treated patients also showed significant improvement in their back pain (−3.8 points, 95%CI, −3.1 to −4.6) whereas those patients treated with NSM had no change (−0.3 points, 95%CI, 0.1 to −0.7; p<0.0001). Similar results for pain were obtained at one month (BKP: −3.9 [95%CI, −3.1 to −4.7]; NSM: −0.6 [95%CI, −0.1 to −1.1]; p<0.0001). The greater pain relief observed in the BKP group was accompanied by a greater reduction in the usage of any analgesics to control pain relief within one month (p=0.002). BKP patients also reported fewer days (compared to NSM) within two weeks where their activity was limited due to back pain (6.3 fewer days per 2 weeks; 95%CI, 5.8 to 6.8; p<0.0001) and greater improvements in quality of life as measured by the SF-36 physical component summary score (8.4 points higher; 95%CI, 7.7 to 9.1; p<0.0001). Thirty-eight of the 61 patients in the NSM group crossed over and underwent BKP with 21 (58%) occurring within 1 week of the 1-month visit. These cross-over patients were also assessed for safety and efficacy at 1 month following the procedure and through the study period. They showed similar benefits in regards to back disability, back pain relief, analgesic use, activity level, and quality of life as those originally assigned to BKP. Among all patients treated with BKP, these improvements were sustained throughout the 12-month study period. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. One serious adverse event in the form of an intra-operative non-Q-wave myocardial infarction resolved and was attributed to anesthesia. One patient with a cement leakage to the disc had an adjacent fracture occur 1 day after the index procedure; the local investigator judged this to be device-related. This randomized study demonstrates that cancer patients with VCFs treated with BKP have a superior outcome compared to NSM as measured by the primary endpoint, the RMDQ score. BKP also resulted in a marked reduction in back pain, improved quality of life and fewer days with limitation of daily activities; these outcomes were both clinically and statistically significant and these effects were maintained throughout the 12 month study period. This study supports the benefits of BKP in the management of cancer patients with VCFs. Disclosures: Berenson: Medtronic Spine LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pflugmacher:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding. Jarzem:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding. Zonder:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding. Tillman:Medtronic Spine LLC: Employment. Ashraf:Medtronic Spine LLC: Employment. Vrionis:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Epstein

Background:Although the majority of patients with traumatic/atraumatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) may be managed with non-surgical treatment (NST), a subset (e.g. 40%) with significant pain, loss of vertebral height, and other factors may warrant percutaneous vertebroplasty (V), or percutaneous kyphoplasty (K).Methods:We compared the impact of these three treatment modalities, V, K, or NST, for managing OVCFs.Results:In several studies, both V and K resulted in comparable improvement in pain relief, postoperative kyphotic angles, increased anterior vertebral heights, and frequency of leakage of bone cement. One study evaluating 16 RCT’s (Randomized Controlled Studies), however, observed K significantly; “decreased the kyphotic wedge angle, increased the postoperative vertebral body height, and decreased the risk of cement leakage vs. V”. Further, in some series, both V and K resulted in higher quality of life scores and better pain relief vs. NST, while other studies showed V was superior to K. Further, although the risk of adjacent level fractures (ALF) following V, K, and NST were comparable in most studies, one clearly demonstrated NST had the lowest incidence of ALF. Despite all these findings, most studies concluded outcomes were comparable for all 3 groups.Conclusions:Although most OVCFs are still managed with non-surgical treatment (NST), a subset (e.g. about 40%) may warrant V or K. Although both V and K have been shown to result in significantly better pain relief, higher quality of life scores, increased postoperative vertebral body height compared with NST, outcomes for all 3 groups remained the same.


2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Sik Ryu ◽  
Chun Kun Park ◽  
Moon Chan Kim ◽  
Joon Ki Kang

Object. The use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement by percutaneous injection in cases requiring vertebroplasty provides pain relief in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A retrospective study was performed to assess what caused PMMA cement to leak into the epidural space and to determine if this leakage caused any changes in its therapeutic benefits. Methods. Polymethylmethacrylate was injected into 347 vertebral compression fractures in 159 patients. The cement leaked into the epidural space in 92 (26.5%) of 347 treated vertebrae in 64 (40.3%) of the 159 patients, as demonstrated on postoperative computerized tomography scanning. Epidural leakage of PMMA cement occurred more often when injected above the level of T-7 (p = 0.001) than below. The larger the volume of PMMA injected the higher the incidence of epidural leakage (p = 0.03). Using an injector also increased epidural leakage (p = 0.045). The position of the needle tip within the vertebral body and the pattern of venous drainage did not affect epidural leakage of the cement. Leakage of PMMA into the epidural space reduced the pain relief expected after vertebroplasty. The immediate postoperative visual analog scale scores were higher (and therefore reflective of less pain relief) in patients in whom epidural PMMA leakage occurred (p = 0.009). Three months postoperatively, the authors found the highest number of patients presenting with pain relief, including those in the group with epidural leakage, and at this follow-up stage there were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions. The authors found that epidural leakage of PMMA after percutaneous vertebroplasty was dose dependent. The larger amount of injected PMMA, the higher the incidence of leakage. Injecting vertebral levels above T-7 also increased the incidence of epidural leakage. Epidural leakage of PMMA may attenuate only the immediate therapeutic effects of vertebroplasty.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Kumar ◽  
Gary Hunter ◽  
Denny Demeria

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To present an in-depth analysis of clinical predictors of outcome including age, sex, etiology of pain, type of electrodes used, duration of pain, duration of treatment, development of tolerance, employment status, activities of daily living, psychological status, and quality of life. Suggestions for treatment of low back pain with a predominant axial component are addressed. We analyzed the complications and proposed remedial measures to improve the effectiveness of this modality. METHODS: Study group consists of 410 patients (252 men, 58 women) with a mean age of 54 years and a mean follow-up period of 97.6 months. All patients were gated through a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The study was conducted over 22 years. RESULTS: The early success rate was 80% (328 patients), whereas the long-term success rate of internalized patients was 74.1% (243 patients) after the mean follow-up period of 97.6 months. Hardware-related complications included displaced or fractured electrodes, infection, and hardware malfunction. Etiologies demonstrating efficacy included failed back syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, angina pain, complex regional pain syndrome I and II, peripheral neuropathy, lower limb pain caused by multiple sclerosis. Age, sex, laterality of pain or number of surgeries before implant did not play a role in predicting outcome. The percentage of pain relief was inversely related to the time interval between pain onset and time of implantation. Radicular pain with axial component responded better to dual Pisces electrode or Specify-Lead implantation. CONCLUSION: Spinal cord stimulation can provide significant long-term pain relief with improved quality of life and employment. Results of this study will be effective in better defining prognostic factors and reducing complications leading to higher success rates with spinal cord stimulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document