scholarly journals Performance of Mobility Models with different Routing Protocols by using Simulation Tools for WSN: A Review

IJARCCE ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megha Jain ◽  
V. K. Patle ◽  
Sanjay Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Mobility Models ◽  
Simulation Tools

scholarly journals Students Social Based Mobility Model for MANET-DTN Networks

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dávid Hrabčák ◽  
Martin Matis ◽  
L’ubomír Doboš ◽  
Ján Papaj
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Real World ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Social Relation ◽  
Mobility Model ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Mobility Models ◽  
Simulation Tools ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Wireless Mobile

In the real world, wireless mobile devices are carried by humans. For this reason, it is useful if mobility models as simulation tools used to test routing protocols and other MANET-DTN features follow the behaviour of humans. In this paper, we propose a new social based mobility model called Students Social Based Mobility Model (SSBMM). This mobility model is inspired by the daily routine of student’s life. Since many current social based mobility models give nodes freedom in terms of movement according to social feeling and attractivity to other nodes or places, we focus more on the mandatory part of our life, such as going to work and school. In the case of students, this mandatory part of their life is studying in university according to their schedule. In their free time, they move and behave according to attractivity to other nodes or places of their origin. Finally, proposed SSBMM was tested and verified by Tools for Evaluation of Social Relation in Mobility Models and compared with random based mobility models. At the end, SSBMM was simulated to examine the impact of social relations on routing protocols.

Impact of Trace-Based Mobility Models on the Energy Consumption of Delay-Tolerant Routing Protocols

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Khalid Mahbub Khan ◽  
Muhammad Sajjadur Rahim ◽  
Abu Zafor Md. Touhidul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Mobility Models ◽  
Delay Tolerant

scholarly journals Venue-based Mobility Models: Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols

2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sehrish Abrejo ◽  
Hameedullah Kazi ◽  
Shams-ul-Arfeen Shams-ul-Arfeen
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Mobility Models ◽  
Manet Routing

scholarly journals Performance Comparison of Routing protocols Using Different Mobility Models

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 54-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailender Gupta ◽  
Chirag Kumar ◽  
Seema Rani ◽  
Bharat Bhushan
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Mobility Models

scholarly journals Analysis of Delay-Tolerant Routing Protocols using the Impact of Mobility Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Md. Sharif Hossen ◽  
Muhammad Sajjadur Rahim
Keyword(s):  
Wireless Ad Hoc Networks ◽  
Shortest Path ◽  
Mobile Networks ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Mobility Models ◽  
Shortest Path Map ◽  
Delay Tolerant ◽  
The Impact

Intermittently connected mobile networks are sparsely connected wireless ad-hoc networks where there is no end-to-end path from a source device to a destination. Generally, these paths do not exist. Hence, these devices use intermittent path using the concept of the store-and-forward mechanism to successfully do the communication. These networks are featured by long delay, dissimilar data rates, and larger error rates. Hence, we see the analysis of several delay-tolerant routing protocols, e.g., epidemic, spray-and-wait, prophet, maxprop, rapid, and spray-and-focus using opportunistic network environment simulator. At first, the investigations of the above considered routing protocols are done across three mobility models namely random direction, random walk, and shortest path map based movement mobility model for node impact only. Then, we evaluate these routing protocols against the impact of message copy, buffer, and time-to-live using shortest path map considering the result of node impact. We use three metrics and the result shows that spray-and-focus deserves good performance for showing higher delivery, lower latency, and lower overhead among all routing techniques while epidemic the poor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document