Factors associated with daily sugar-sweetened beverage or fruit juice consumption between meals by toddlers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Barbara Lesch
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norliza- Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Afiq-Md Zuki ◽  
Nur Azilah- Azahar ◽  
Boon Han- Khor ◽  
Halimatus Sakdiah- Minhat

2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
pp. 1557-1567
Author(s):  
Maryam Yuhas ◽  
Kathleen J. Porter ◽  
Valisa Hedrick ◽  
Jamie M. Zoellner

2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 5-13
Author(s):  
Yeonsoo Kim ◽  
Tak Yan Chau ◽  
Julie M. Rutledge ◽  
Dawn Erickson ◽  
Yunsook Lim

Abstract. The objective of the present study was to investigate factors that affect sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) intake in rural, southern college students in the US. The majority of the participants were male (58 %) and Caucasian (63 %). The average total SSB consumption was 79.4 fl oz/day (2.35 L/d). Results of binary logistic regression analyses of total SSB intake greater than 57.4 fl oz/day (1.8 L/d) versus less than 57.4 fl oz/day showed that factors associated with greater odds for high SSB intake were age greater than 20 years old (odds ratio [OR] = 3.551, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.385 - 9.104, p = 0.008) and being African American (OR = 3.477, 95 % CI = 1.291 - 9.363, p = 0.013). Results of binary logistic regression analyses of total bottled water intake greater than 39.4 fl oz/day (median) versus less than 39.4 fl oz/day showed that consuming alcohol was significantly related to an increased probability of drinking more than 39.4 fl oz (1.17 L/d) of bottled water per day (median; OR = 2.914, 95 % CI = 1.223 - 6.943, p = 0.016). Culturally sensitive strategies are needed to raise awareness for making healthy beverage choices when dining on campus to effectively reduce college student’s SSB consumption.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon J Auerbach ◽  
Sepideh Dibey ◽  
Petra Vallila-Buchman ◽  
Mario Kratz ◽  
James Krieger

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
An Pan ◽  
Vasanti Malik ◽  
Walter C Willett ◽  
Frank B Hu

Introduction: Some caloric beverages (e.g., sugar-sweetened beverage and fruit juice) have been associated with an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes; therefore, substitution of these caloric beverages with non-caloric beverages such as plain water may be important for diabetes prevention. Few previous studies have examined the association between plain water or total beverage intake and risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods: We followed 82,900 women, aged 27-45 years and free of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer at baseline, from 1991 to 2007. Diet, including various beverages, was assessed by food frequency questionnaires and updated every four years. Incident type 2 diabetes cases were confirmed by supplementary questionnaires. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we estimated the effect of “substituting” a serving of one beverage for another by including both as continuous variables in the same multivariable model. The difference in their beta coefficients and their variances and covariance were used to estimate the RR and 95% CI for the substitution effect. Results: During 1,294,196 person-years of follow-up, we documented 2,980 incident T2DM cases. After adjustment for age and body mass index, compared with the reference group (<1 glass/d), the relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of type 2 diabetes according to categories of plain water consumption were 0.91 (0.81-1.02) for 1 glass/d, 0.91 (0.82-1.01) for 2-3 glasses/d, 0.98 (0.87-1.11) for 4-5 glasses/d, and 1.02 (0.89-1.18) for 6 or more glasses/d (P-for-trend=0.51). Further adjustment for other diabetes risk factors did not substantially alter the RRs. We estimated that substituting one serving/d of plain water for one serving/d of sugar-sweetened beverage or fruit juice was associated with a 10% (95% CI, 6%-13%) and 13% (95% CI, 7%-18%) lower risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively. In this cohort, no association was found for total beverage intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: compared with women who drank less than 6 servings/d of total beverage, the RRs (95% CIs) were 0.97 (0.87-1.09), 0.98 (0.88-1.10), 1.01 (0.89-11.5), and 0.99 (0.86-1.14) for women drank 6-8, 8-10, 10-12, and ≥12 servings/d of total beverages (P-for-trend=0.83). Conclusions: Increasing consumption of water per se was not associated with risk of type 2 diabetes, but substituting plain water for sugar-sweetened beverage or fruit juice was associated with a significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohyun Park ◽  
Heidi M. Blanck ◽  
Bettylou Sherry ◽  
Nancy Brener ◽  
Terrence O'Toole

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 838-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Beck ◽  
Alicia Fernandez ◽  
Jenssy Rojina ◽  
Michael Cabana

The objective of this study was to evaluate an educational module for Latino parents about the health effects of sweet beverages. Latino parents were randomized to receive the beverage module or a control module. Child beverage consumption was assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, and 3 months via a beverage recall survey. At 2-week follow-up, children of intervention participants had a mean reduction in 7-day total sugar-sweetened beverage and 100% fruit juice consumption of 16 ounces while controls had a mean increase of 4 ounces ( P = .01). At 2-month and 3-month follow-up, there was a reduction in mean total sugar-sweetened beverage and 100% fruit juice consumption among both intervention and control children. An educational module on beverages for Latino parents reduced child consumption of sweet beverages at 2-week follow-up. However, study participation appears to have also reduced controls’ beverage consumption suggesting that frequent intensive surveys of beverage intake may be an intervention unto itself.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina M. Pollard ◽  
Xingqiong Meng ◽  
Gilly A. Hendrie ◽  
Delia Hendrie ◽  
Denise Sullivan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document