scholarly journals ​Chapter 9Beyond accessibility: Using Shared Canvas in digital facsimile editions

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Smith ◽  
Raffaele Viglianti
Keyword(s):  
Digital Facsimile

Erratum: New preprocessing technique for digital facsimile transmission

1980 ◽  
Vol 16 (16) ◽  
pp. 644
Author(s):  
M.G.B. Ismail ◽  
R.J. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Preprocessing Technique ◽  
Digital Facsimile

The Whole Book and the Whole Picture

Insular Books ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Connolly
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Medieval Period ◽  
Facsimile Edition ◽  
Partial Representation ◽  
Digital Facsimile ◽  
Critical Perception

This chapter considers the ways in which medieval miscellanies have been available to scholars from the mid-19th century onwards, and how the uneven nature of that availability, through facsimile, edition, or commentary, has shaped perceptions of the very nature of this type of manuscript. Attention is paid to how fully facsimiles, editions, and studies represent their originals, and to the distortions of critical perception that can result from partial representation. Also noted is the tendency to privilege manuscripts that are associated with particular authors, and with scribes, patrons, or readers who can be named (even though the majority of medieval miscellanies cannot be connected to any type of biographical context); examples include John Shirley, Richard Hill, Robert Reynes, Robert Thornton, and John Vale. The merits and feasibility of editing miscellanies and producing facsimiles, especially digital facsimile, or other types of study are explored, largely in relation to English examples from the later medieval period.

The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile: Research Edition (review)

Parergon ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 279-281
Author(s):  
Toby Burrows
Keyword(s):  
Digital Facsimile
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document