scholarly journals EFFECTS OF PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD VERSUS LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON COLONY COUNT ON VENOUS ULCERATION

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2471-2476
Author(s):  
Nesrien A. Abd-Elrashid ◽  
◽  
Ahmed S. Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed M.Kenawy ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electromagnetic Field ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Colony Count ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field ◽  
Venous Ulceration ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Field Versus ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic

Low-level laser therapy vs. pulsed electromagnetic field on neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 901-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Emes ◽  
Kivanç Akça ◽  
Buket Aybar ◽  
Serhat Yalçın ◽  
Yeliz Çavuşoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electromagnetic Field ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Neonatal Rat ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic ◽  
Calvarial Osteoblast

scholarly journals Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Long ◽  
Ujjwal Pyakurel ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Lina Liao ◽  
Yang Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Electromagnetic Fields ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Electrical Current ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Materials and Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, CENTRAL, and SIGLE from January 1990 to August 2011 for randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of interventions on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. The processes of study search, selection, and quality assessment were conducted independently in duplicate by two review authors. Original outcome data, if possible, underwent statistical pooling by using Review Manager 5. Results: Through a predefined search strategy, we finally included nine eligible studies. Among them, five interventions were studied (ie, low-level laser therapy, corticotomy, electrical current, pulsed electromagnetic fields, and dentoalveolar or periodontal distraction). Six outcomes were evaluated in these studies (ie, accumulative moved distance or movement rate, time required to move tooth to its destination, anchorage loss, periodontal health, pulp vitality, and root resorption). Conclusion: Among the five interventions, corticotomy is effective and safe to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, low-level laser therapy was unable to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, current evidence does not reveal whether electrical current and pulsed electromagnetic fields are effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement, and dentoalveolar or periodontal distraction is promising in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement but lacks convincing evidence.

Assessment of healing of dental implant surgical site following Low-Level Laser Therapy using Bio-Clinical parameters: An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
VARSHA PALLED ◽  
DR. JITENDRA RAO ◽  
DR. RAGHUWAR DAYAL SINGH ◽  
DR. SHUCHI TRIPATHI ◽  
DR. KALPANA SINGH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Implant Stability Quotient ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) improves the healing of the implant surgical site with clinical and biochemical parameters.Thirty patients with an edentulous space spanning a single tooth were selected. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups - the control group and the test group. The test group received laser energy at a power of 2J/cm 2 with a total of 4-6J energy over each implant. Clinical parameters (Implant Stability Quotient, probing index, modified sulcus bleeding index)and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months).The test group showed significantly higher implant stability quotient compared to thecontrol group at 2 weeks(57.93±3.95 and 35.67±3.08; p<0.01) and 3months(58.86±3.75 and 67.06±3.78; p<0.01). A significant rise in OPG levels of the test group(686.30±125.36pg/ml at baseline and 784.25±108.30pg/ml at 3months;p<0.01) was seen contrary to significant decline in the control group (839.50±249.08pg/ml at baseline,415.30±78.39pg/ml at 3months;p<0.01). Within the limitations of the study, the study suggests that the healing of peri-implant hard and soft tissues may be enhanced with the use of LLLT as an explicit modality during the post-operative period.

Low-level laser therapy for neurosensory recovery after sagittal ramus osteotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Esteves Pinto Faria ◽  
Astrid Temprano ◽  
Fábio Piva ◽  
Eduardo Sant'ana ◽  
Dênis Pimenta
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document