scholarly journals ANATOMICAL VARIATION IN BRANCHING PATTERN AND DOMINANCE IN CORONARY ARTERIES: A CADAVERIC STUDY

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1.3) ◽  
pp. 3611-3617
Author(s):  
Vandana Ravi ◽  
◽  
Tejesh S ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-530
Author(s):  
Vengadachalam Kittu ◽  
◽  
Santhakumar Rangarajan ◽  
Muniappan Veerappan ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Kalai Anbusudar ◽  
◽  
Dhivya Sengottuvel ◽  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 396-397
Author(s):  
Dr. Maulik D Patel ◽  
◽  
Dr. Astha A Jain ◽  
Dr. C. A Pensi

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 270-273
Author(s):  
Padmashree Chougule ◽  
◽  
Dr. Nazmeen Silotry ◽  
Dr. Lalita Chavan

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
Sony Jhansi Priya ◽  
Sangeetha A ◽  
M. Sai Krishna

Coronary artery variations are one of the commonest variations observed during clinical procedures. Normally, there are two main coronary arteries, the right coronary artery (RCA), left coronary artery (LCA).Left coronary artery gives two important branches left circumex artery (LCX) and left anterior descending (LAD) arteries. Knowledge about the coronary vessels and its variations are essential to clinicians to prevent untoward injury of vessels during any procedures. To study the morphology and variations of coronar Aim: y arteries by dissection. Materials and Methods: The present study was a cadaveric study which was conducted on 50 hearts obtained from adult human cadavers. Coronary arteries were dissected to see the origin, course and variations. The data was entered in Microsoft excel sheet and expressed in percentage. The Right Results: coronary artery branched out from the right aortic sinus and had an average diameter of 3.5mm. The left coronary artery arouse from left aortic sinus and had an average diameter of 4mm. LMCA divided into two branches in 60 percent, three branches in 30 percent and four branches in 06 percent of the hearts and direct branches from left aortic sinuus in 4 percent hearts.Based on the origin of Posterior descending or interventricular artery, Right dominance was observed in 68 percent, left dominance in 26 percent, and equal dominance in 06 percent of the hearts. Conclusion: Knowledge about the variations of coronary vessels is a prerequisite for clinicians to perform interventions of coronary vessels.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 853-859
Author(s):  
Artid Samerchua ◽  
Prangmalee Leurcharusmee ◽  
Krit Panjasawatwong ◽  
Kittitorn Pansuan ◽  
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh

Background and objectivesThe intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) has significant anatomical variation. Localization of the ICBN requires an operator’s skill. This cadaveric study aims to describe two simple ultrasound-guided plane blocks of the ICBN when it emerges at the chest wall (proximal approach) and passes through the axillary fossa (distal approach).MethodsThe anatomical relation of the ICBN and adjacent structures was investigated in six fresh cadavers. Thereafter, we described two potential techniques of the ICBN block. The proximal approach was an injection medial to the medial border of the serratus anterior muscle at the inferior border of the second rib. The distal approach was an injection on the surface of the latissimus dorsi muscle at 3–4 cm caudal to the axillary artery. The ultrasound-guided proximal and distal ICBN blocks were performed in seven hemithoraxes and axillary fossae. We recorded dye staining on the ICBN, its branches and clinically correlated structures.ResultsAll ICBNs originated from the second intercostal nerve and 34.6% received a contribution from the first or third intercostal nerve. All ICBNs gave off axillary branches in the axillary fossa and ran towards the posteromedial aspect of the arm. Following the proximal ICBN block, dye stained on 90% of all ICBN’s origins. After the distal ICBN block, all terminal branches and 43% of the axillary branches of the ICBN were stained.ConclusionsThe proximal and distal ICBN blocks, using easily recognized sonoanatomical landmarks, provided consistent dye spread to the ICBN. We encourage further validation of these two techniques in clinical studies.


Author(s):  
Urmila Pateliya ◽  
Rakesh Rajat ◽  
Kanan Shah ◽  
Monica Chudasma ◽  
Jitendra Patel

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 2192-2195
Author(s):  
Lovesh Shukla ◽  
◽  
Samridhi Puri ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document