Consensus Statement

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S7 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M W Gee ◽  
A Howell ◽  
W J Gullick ◽  
C C Benz ◽  
R L Sutherland ◽  
...  

Anti-hormones (notably tamoxifen), chemotherapy and modern radiotherapeutic approaches are invaluable in the management of breast cancer, and collectively have contributed substantially to the improved survival in this disease. Moreover, there is promise that these successes will continue with the emergence of other endocrine agents (for example, aromatase inhibitors and pure anti-oestrogens). However, de novo and acquired resistance comprises a significant problem with all treatment approaches examined to date. This Workshop aimed to evaluate the contribution made by growth factor signalling pathways in the various resistant states, primarily focusing on resistance to anti-hormonal strategies and spanning experimental models and, where possible, clinical breast cancer data. The successes and limitations of therapeutic targeting of these pathways with various signal transduction inhibitors (STIs) were evaluated in model systems and from emerging clinical trials (including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors such as gefitinib). It was concluded that growth factor signalling is an important contributor in the development of endocrine resistance in breast cancer and that use of STIs provides a promising therapeutic strategy for this disease. However, the cancer cell is clearly able to harness alternative growth factor signalling pathways for growth and cell survival in the presence of STI monotherapy and, as a consequence, the efficacy of STIs is likely to be limited by the acquisition of resistance. A number of strategies were proposed from studies in model systems that appeared to enhance anti-tumour actions of existing STI monotherapy, notably including combination therapies targeting multiple pathways. With the increased availability of diverse STIs and improved drug delivery, there is much hope that the more complex therapeutic strategies proposed may ultimately be achievable in clinical practice.

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S29-S36 ◽  
Author(s):  
R I Nicholson ◽  
I R Hutcheson ◽  
S E Hiscox ◽  
J M Knowlden ◽  
M Giles ◽  
...  

De novo insensitivity and acquired resistance to the selective oestrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen and the pure anti-oestrogen fulvestrant (faslodex) severely limit their effectiveness in breast cancer patients. This is a major clinical problem, since each year upward of 1 million women are dispensed anti-oestrogenic drugs. In order to investigate the phenomenon of anti-oestrogen resistance and to rapidly screen drugs that target the resistance mechanism(s), we have previously established several in vitro breast cancer models that have acquired resistance to anti-hormones. Such cells commonly develop an ability to proliferate after approximately 3 months of exposure to 4-hydroxytamoxifen or fulvestrant, despite an initial endocrine-responsive (i.e. growth-suppressive) phase. The current paper explores the role that growth factor signalling plays in the transition of oestrogen receptor-positive endocrine-responsive breast cancer cells to anti-oestrogen resistance or insensitivity and how we might, in the future, most effectively use anti-growth factor therapies to treat or delay endocrine-resistant states.


Author(s):  
Todd W. Miller

Adjuvant therapy with antiestrogens targeting estrogen receptor α (ER) signaling prevents disease recurrence in many patients with early-stage ER+ breast cancer. However, a significant number of cases exhibit de novo or acquired endocrine resistance. While other clinical subtypes of breast cancer (HER2+, triple-negative) have disproportionately higher rates of mortality, ER+ breast cancer is responsible for at least as many deaths because it is the most common subtype. Therefore, identifying mechanisms that drive endocrine resistance is a high clinical priority. A large body of experimental evidence indicates that oncogenic signaling pathways underlie endocrine resistance, including growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases (HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], fibroblast growth factor receptor 1/2 [FGFR], insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor [IGF-1R]/ insulin receptor [InsR]), PI3K/AKT/ mTOR, MAPK/ERK, Src, CDK4/CDK6, and ER itself. Combined targeting of ER and such pathways may be the most effective means to combat antiestrogen resistance, and clinical trials testing such strategies show promising results. Herein, we discuss pathways associated with endocrine resistance, biomarkers that may be useful to predict response to targeted agents, and avenues for further exploration to identify strategies for the treatment of patients with endocrine-resistant disease.


Author(s):  
Stephen R. D. Johnston ◽  
Gaia Schiavon

Overcoming de novo or acquired endocrine resistance remains critical to further enhancing the benefit of existing endocrine therapies. Recent progress has been made in understanding the molecular biology associated with acquired endocrine resistance, including adaptive “cross-talk” between ER and various growth factor receptor and cell-signaling pathways. Strategies that combine endocrine therapy with targeted inhibitors of growth factor receptors or cell-survival pathways to further enhance first-line response have largely been disappointing, suggesting that any attempts to prevent endocrine resistance by blocking specific pathways from the outset will be futile. In contrast, success has been seen by selecting patients with acquired endocrine resistance and enhancing response to further endocrine therapy by the addition of mTOR antagonists. Numerous other therapeutics are being evaluated in combination with endocrine therapies based on varying levels of preclinical science to support their use, including inhibitors of PI3K, HDAC, Src, IGFR-1, and CDK4/6. Enriching trial recruitment by molecular profiling of different ER+ subtypes will become increasingly important to maximize any additional benefit that these new agents may bring to current endocrine therapies for breast cancer.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1379-1379
Author(s):  
Klaus H. Metzeler ◽  
Nadine Sandhöfer ◽  
Tanja Hinrichsen ◽  
Evelyn Zellmeier ◽  
Bianka Ksienzyk ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1379 Background: A large number of gene mutations have been recently detected in AML using novel sequencing technologies. We established a rapid, amplicon-based resequencing assay that allows efficient analysis of 16 of the most commonly mutated genes in AML and used it to study a cohort of AML patients (pts) carrying a translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23) (MLLT3-MLL; MLL-AF9). This genetic subgroup, accounting for ∼1% of adult AML, is associated with young age, treatment-related disease, FAB M4/M5 morphology, and an intermediate prognosis. There is limited information on the cooperating genetic lesions in adult AML with t(9;11). Importantly, several widely used murine AML models are based on MLLT3-MLL fusion transcript expression. Thus, a better understanding of the genetic basis of human MLLT3-MLL-rearranged AML is necessary to understand how well these animal models reflect their human counterpart and whether findings from MLLT3-MLL-induced disease are generalizable to other genetic subsets. Patients and Methods: We studied 33 bone marrow samples from adult AML pts with t(9;11)(p22;q23) (age range, 20–71 years; median, 44 years; 21 de novo and 12 therapy-related AML). Mutations in ASXL1, CBL, DNMT3A, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, KRAS, NRAS, NPM1, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, TET2, U2AF1 and WT1 were analyzed from 250ng of genomic DNA using a multiplexed, amplicon-based next-generation sequencing approach (Illumina TruSeq Custom Amplicon assay and MiSeq sequencer). KRAS mutations were independently verified using PCR followed by 454 sequencing (Roche), and NRAS and FLT3 mutations by PCR and melting curve analysis or Sanger sequencing. Results: Per patient, we obtained between 96k and 235k paired-end reads (2×150bp) mapping to the regions of interest, resulting in median coverage depths of the target genes ranging from 180-fold (SRSF2) to >2500-fold (KRAS). Overall, mutations affecting growth factor signalling pathways were detected in 73% of MLLT3-MLL rearranged AML (24/33; Figure): Fourteen pts (42%) carried KRAS mutations mostly affecting the known hotspot codons 12, 13 and 61, 6 pts (18%) had NRAS mutations (mainly at codons 12 or 13), 5 pts had FLT3 mutations (4 tyrosine kinase domain mutations and 1 internal tandem duplication), and 2 pts had mutated CBL. The frequency of RAS gene mutations did not differ significantly between de novo AML and pts with treatment-related disease (P=.26). More than one RAS mutation was found in 7 pts, including pts with 2 (n=3) or 3 (n=1) distinct KRAS mutations, 2 pts with mutations in both NRAS and KRAS, and one patient with 2 NRAS mutations. Interestingly, in some of these pts, one mutation was present in a relatively large proportion of sequencing reads (e.g., patient UPN12 showing a KRAS p.Q61H mutation in 36% of reads, consistent with a heterozygous mutation present in the majority of cells in the specimen), while other coexisting mutations affected a much smaller proportion of reads (in patient UPN12, two different KRAS exon 2 mutations in 5% and 2% of reads, respectively). These results suggest the presence of different subclones within the AML blast population, each carrying a different KRAS mutation. Analyses of follow-up samples are underway to assess changes of clonal architecture over time. Other gene mutations were rarely found in this cytogenetic subgroup of AML: In our 33 pts, we detected 2 ASXL1 mutations, 1 mutation each in TET2, SRSF2 and U2AF1, and no mutations in the other 8 genes we studied. Conclusion: Targeted resequencing using a multiplexed amplicon-based assay is a sensitive and rapid method to screen for mutations in a panel of genes commonly involved in AML pathogenesis. To our knowledge, our report is the first comprehensive analysis of cooperating gene mutations in adult AML with t(9;11)(p22;q23). We demonstrate that MLLT3-MLL-rearranged AML is characterized by frequent mutations in genes involved in growth factor signalling (particularly KRAS and NRAS, mutated in 40% and 18%, respectively, of our MLL-MLLT3 AML cohort compared to only about 5% of unselected AML pts), in the absence of other common AML-related gene mutations. Our results complement recent studies reporting RAS mutations in 45% of infant MLL-rearranged ALL, and functional data from mouse models showing that RAS mutations cooperate with the MLLT3-MLL fusion during leukemogenesis. Finally, our results provide evidence for clonal heterogeneity within MLLT3-MLL rearranged human AML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. AlFakeeh ◽  
C. Brezden-Masley

Endocrine therapy, a major modality in the treatment of hormone receptor (hr)–positive breast cancer (bca), has improved outcomes in metastatic and nonmetastatic disease. However, a limiting factor to the use of endocrine therapy in bca is resistance resulting from the development of escape pathways that promote the survival of cancer cells despite estrogen receptor (er)–targeted therapy. The resistance pathways involve extensive cross-talk between er and receptor tyrosine kinase growth factors [epidermal growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2), and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor] and their downstream signalling pathways—most notably pi3k/akt/mtor and mapk. In some cases, resistance develops as a result of genetic or epigenetic alterations in various components of the signalling pathways, such as overexpression of her2 and erα co-activators, aberrant expression of cell-cycle regulators, and PIK3CA mutations. By combining endocrine therapy with various molecularly targeted agents and signal transduction inhibitors, some success has been achieved in overcoming and modulating endocrine resistance in hr-positive bca. Established strategies include selective er downregulators, anti-her2 agents, mtor (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitors, and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. Inhibitors of pi3ka are not currently a treatment option for women with hr-positive bca outside the context of clinical trial. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring more agents that could be combined with endocrine therapy, and biomarkers that would help to guide decision-making and maximize clinical efficacy. In this review article, we address current treatment strategies for endocrine resistance, and we highlight future therapeutic targets in the endocrine pathway of bca.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S15-S24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suleiman Massarweh ◽  
Rachel Schiff

Targeting the estrogen receptor (ER) is the oldest form of molecular targeted therapy, and the widespread use of the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen in breast cancer is responsible for major improvements in cure rates, quality of life, and disease prevention in the last 25 years. Newer forms of endocrine therapy now available for the management of endocrine responsive breast cancer include a new generation of aromatase inhibitors, which lower the estrogen ligand for ER, and pure ER antagonists which destroy the receptor. Despite these recent clinical advances, intrinsic and acquired resistance to these endocrine therapies is still a common feature that limits the success of this therapeutic strategy. Recent research into the molecular biology of ER signaling has revealed a remarkably complex interactive signaling with other growth factor signaling pathways in breast cancer cells, potentially explaining some of the reasons behind endocrine therapy action as well as resistance. This view of a more complex ER signaling system has uncovered new molecular targets which, if present in a cancer cell, might be additionally targeted using various signal transduction inhibitors to overcome or prevent resistance to endocrine therapy. In addition, the dynamic inverse relationship between the expression of ER and growth factor receptors brings more excitement to the potential of restoring ER expression in apparently ER-negative cells by inhibition of growth factor signaling. Ongoing clinical trials of endocrine therapy combined with growth factor pathway inhibitors or their downstream signaling elements promise to further improve the present care for breast cancer patients.


Endocrinology ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Pérez Piñero ◽  
Sebastián Giulianelli ◽  
Caroline A Lamb ◽  
Claudia Lanari

Abstract Luminal breast cancer (BrCa) has a favorable prognosis compared to other tumor subtypes. However, with time tumors may evolve and lead to disease progression. Thus, there is a great interest in unraveling the mechanisms that drive tumor metastasis and endocrine resistance. In this review we focused in one of the many pathways that have been involved in tumor progression, the FGF/FGFR axis. We emphasized in data obtained from in vivo experimental models since we believe that in luminal BrCa, tumor growth relies in a crosstalk with the stromal tissue. We revisited the studies that illustrate the interaction between hormone receptors and FGFR. We also highlighted the most frequent alterations found in BrCa cell lines and we provide a short review on the trials that use FGFR inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapies. The analysis of this data suggests that there are many players involved in this pathway that might be also targeted to decrease FGF signaling in addition to specific FGFR inhibitors that may be exploited to increase their efficacy.


Metallomics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1579-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Ziliotto ◽  
Julia M. W. Gee ◽  
Ian O. Ellis ◽  
Andrew R. Green ◽  
Pauline Finlay ◽  
...  

Zinc transporter ZIP7 activates key downstream signalling pathways and is correlated with important clinicopathological parameters that are associated with endocrine resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document