scholarly journals Land Use Change and Forest Carbon Sink Assessment in an Alpine Mountain Area of the Veneto Region (Northeast Italy)

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Dalla Valle ◽  
Silvia Lamedica ◽  
Roberto Pilli ◽  
Tommaso Anfodillo
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Veneto Region ◽  
Mountain Area

scholarly journals Monitoring Network Confirms Land Use Change is a Substantial Component of the Forest Carbon Sink in the eastern United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Woodall ◽  
B. F. Walters ◽  
J. W. Coulston ◽  
A. W. D’Amato ◽  
G. M. Domke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Eastern United States

scholarly journals Land use change and nitrogen feedbacks constrain the trajectory of the land carbon sink

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (19) ◽  
pp. 5218-5222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gerber ◽  
Lars O. Hedin ◽  
Sonja G. Keel ◽  
Stephen W. Pacala ◽  
Elena Shevliakova
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Carbon Sink

The contributions of land-use change, CO2 fertilization, and climate variability to the Eastern US carbon sink

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2370-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARCO ALBANI ◽  
DAVID MEDVIGY ◽  
GEORGE C. HURTT ◽  
PAUL R. MOORCROFT
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Climate Variability ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Co2 Fertilization

In search of the missing carbon sink: a model of terrestrial biospheric response to land-use change and atmospheric CO2

Tellus B ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTHONY W. KING ◽  
WILLIAM R. EMANUEL ◽  
STAN D. WULLSCHLEGER ◽  
WILFRED M. POST
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 ◽  
Missing Carbon Sink

scholarly journals The impact of nitrogen and phosphorous limitation on the estimated terrestrial carbon balance and warming of land use change over the last 156 yr

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 507-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Zhang ◽  
A. J. Pitman ◽  
Y. P. Wang ◽  
Y. Dai ◽  
P. J. Lawrence
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Co2 Emissions ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Terrestrial Carbon ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Terrestrial Carbon Sink ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. We examine the impact of land use and land cover change (LULCC) over the period from 1850 to 2005 using an Earth System Model that incorporates nitrogen and phosphorous limitation on the terrestrial carbon cycle. We compare the estimated CO2 emissions and warming from land use change in a carbon only version of the model with those from simulations including nitrogen and phosphorous limitation. If we omit nutrients, our results suggest LULCC cools on the global average by about 0.1 °C. Including nutrients reduces this cooling to ~ 0.05 °C. Our results also suggest LULCC has a major impact on total land carbon over the period 1850–2005. In carbon only simulations, the inclusion of LULCC decreases the total additional land carbon stored in 2005 from around 210 Pg C to 85 Pg C. Including nitrogen and phosphorous limitation also decreases the scale of the terrestrial carbon sink to 80 Pg C. In particular, adding LULCC on top of the nutrient limited simulations changes the sign of the terrestrial carbon flux from a sink to a source (12 Pg C). The CO2 emission from LULCC from 1850 to 2005 is estimated to be 130 Pg C for carbon only simulation, or 97 Pg C if nutrient limitation is accounted for in our model. The difference between these two estimates of CO2 emissions from LULCC largely results from the weaker response of photosynthesis to increased CO2 and smaller carbon pool sizes, and therefore lower carbon loss from plant and wood product carbon pools under nutrient limitation. We suggest that nutrient limitation should be accounted in simulating the effects of LULCC on the past climate and on the past and future carbon budget.

scholarly journals The impact of nitrogen and phosphorous limitation on the estimated terrestrial carbon balance and warming of land use change over the last 156 yr

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Zhang ◽  
A. J. Pitman ◽  
Y. P. Wang ◽  
Y. J. Dai ◽  
P. J. Lawrence
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Nutrient Limitation ◽  
Co2 Emissions ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Terrestrial Carbon ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Terrestrial Carbon Sink ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. We examine the impact of land use and land cover change (LULCC) over the period from 1850 to 2005 using an Earth system model that incorporates nitrogen and phosphorous limitation on the terrestrial carbon cycle. We compare the estimated CO2 emissions and warming from land use change in a carbon-only version of the model with those from simulations, including nitrogen and phosphorous limitation. If we omit nutrients, our results suggest LULCC cools on the global average by about 0.1 °C. Including nutrients reduces this cooling to ~ 0.05 °C. Our results also suggest LULCC has a major impact on total land carbon over the period 1850–2005. In carbon-only simulations, the inclusion of LULCC decreases the total additional land carbon stored in 2005 from around 210 Pg C to 85 Pg C. Including nitrogen and phosphorous limitation also decreases the scale of the terrestrial carbon sink to 80 Pg C. Shown as corresponding fluxes, adding LULCC on top of the nutrient-limited simulations changes the sign of the terrestrial carbon flux from a sink to a source (12 Pg C). The CO2 emission from LULCC from 1850 to 2005 is estimated to be 130 Pg C for carbon only simulation, or 97 Pg C if nutrient limitation is accounted for in our model. The difference between these two estimates of CO2 emissions from LULCC largely results from the weaker response of photosynthesis to increased CO2 and smaller carbon pool sizes, and therefore lower carbon loss from plant and wood product carbon pools under nutrient limitation. We suggest that nutrient limitation should be accounted for in simulating the effects of LULCC on the past climate and on the past and future carbon budget.

scholarly journals Erosion, deposition and replacement of soil organic carbon in Mediterranean catchments: a geomorphological, isotopic and land use change approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1099-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Nadeu ◽  
A. A. Berhe ◽  
J. de Vente ◽  
C. Boix-Fayos
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Soil Organic Carbon ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Terrestrial Carbon ◽  
Change Analysis ◽  
Deep Soil ◽  
Erosion Processes ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

Abstract. Determination of whether soil erosion can constitute a net terrestrial carbon dioxide (CO2) sink continues to suffer from lack of sufficient focused studies and field data. Two of the major gaps in our understanding of the erosion induced terrestrial carbon sink issue include rate of eroded soil organic carbon replacement by production of new photosynthate and stability of eroded organic carbon (OC) post deposition. Here we examined the effect of erosion processes and land use change on the stock, type, and stability of OC in two medium-sized subcatchments (18 and 50 ha in size) in SE Spain. We analysed soil samples from drainage areas and depositional settings for stock and isotopic composition of OC (14C and 13C), and particle size distribution. In addition, we conducted land use change analysis for the period 1956–2008 and a geomorphological survey of the current erosion processes taking place in the slope-streambed connections. Our findings demonstrate that land use change influenced the dominating erosion processes and, thus, the source of eroding sediments. Carbon isotopes used as tracers revealed that in one of the subcatchments the deposited sediments were derived from deep soil (average Δ14C of −271.5 ‰) through non-selective erosion processes and channel incision. In the other subcatchment, topsoil material was predominantly eroded and the average Δ14C in sediments was −64.2 ‰. Replacement of eroded soil OC was taking place in the analysed soil profiles in the slopes suggesting that erosion processes do not necessarily provoke a decrease in soil OC stock over time.

The quantitative estimation of forest carbon storage and its response to land use change in Fuzhou, China

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
陆君 LU Jun ◽  
刘亚风 LIU Yafeng ◽  
齐珂 QI Ke ◽  
樊正球 FAN Zhengqiu
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Quantitative Estimation ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Forest Carbon Storage

scholarly journals In search of the missing carbon sink: a model of terrestrial biospheric response to land-use change and atmospheric CO2

Tellus B ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony W. King ◽  
William R. Emanuel ◽  
Stan D. Wullschleger ◽  
Wilfred M. Post
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 ◽  
Missing Carbon Sink

scholarly journals Erosion, deposition and replacement of soil organic carbon in Mediterranean catchments: a geomorphological, isotopic and land use change approach

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 8351-8382 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Nadeu ◽  
A. A. Berhe ◽  
J. de Vente ◽  
C. Boix-Fayos
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Land Use Change ◽  
Soil Organic Carbon ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Change Analysis ◽  
Deep Soil ◽  
Erosion Processes ◽  
Depositional Settings ◽  
Terrestrial Carbon Sink

Abstract. The assessment of the net effect of soil erosion on the global carbon budget is still incomplete because of lack of enough focused studies and field data. Two of the major gaps on our understanding of the erosion induced terrestrial carbon sink issue include rate of eroded soil organic carbon (OC) replacement by production of new photosynthate and stability of eroded OC post deposition. Here we examine the effect of erosion processes and land use change on the stock, type and stability of OC in two medium-sized subcatchments (18 and 50 ha in size) in SE Spain. We analysed soil samples from drainage areas and depositional settings for stock and isotopic composition of OC (14C and 13C) and particle size distribution. In addition, we conducted land use change analysis for the period 1956–2008 and a geomorphological survey of the current erosion processes taking place in the slope-streambed connections. Our findings demonstrate how land use change influenced the dominating erosion processes and, thus, the source of eroding sediments. Carbon isotopes used as tracers revealed that in one of the subcatchments the deposited sediments derived from deep soil (average Δ14C of −271.5 ‰) through non-selective erosion processes. In the other subcatchment, topsoil material was predominantly eroded and the average Δ14C in sediments was −64.2 ‰. Replacement of eroded soil OC was positive (4 and 11 times-fold losses by erosion) for the analyzed soil profiles in the slopes suggesting that erosion processes do not necessarily provoke a decrease in soil OC stock.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document