scholarly journals SOURCES OF HETEROGENEITY BIAS WHEN DNA MARK-RECAPTURE SAMPLING METHODS ARE APPLIED TO GRIZZLY BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS) POPULATIONS

2004 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 618-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Boulanger ◽  
Gordon Stenhouse ◽  
Robin Munro
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
Heterogeneity Bias

Closure violation in DNA-based mark-recapture estimation of grizzly bear populations

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 642-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Boulanger ◽  
Bruce McLellan
Keyword(s):  
Population Model ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Apparent Survival ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
Closed Model ◽  
Closed Population ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Grid Based

We use methods in the program MARK to explore the effects of closure violation when DNA-based mark–recapture methods are used to estimate grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations. Our approach involves the use of Pradel models in MARK to explore the relationship between recruitment, apparent survival rates, recapture rates, and distance between mean bear-capture locations and the edge of the sampling grid. If the population is demographically closed, it can be assumed that apparent survival estimates the fidelity of bears to the grid area and recruitment estimates rates of addition of bears to the grid area. A core bear population is defined from the Pradel analysis and is used to approximate the grid-based population size. The Huggins closed-population model in MARK is used to provide robust superpopulation estimates by explicitly modeling the relationship between capture probability and distance of bear-capture location from the grid edge. Data from a grizzly bear DNA-based mark–recapture inventory conducted in British Columbia is used to illustrate this method. The results of the Pradel analysis suggest that bears with mean capture locations within 10 km of the grid edge exhibit reduced fidelity rates and higher addition rates. Using the population of bears captured more than 10 km from the grid edge, a core-extrapolated estimate is derived, which is substantially lower than naïve CAPTURE superpopulation estimates. The Huggins model superpopulation estimate displays superior precision compared with CAPTURE model estimates. Our results illustrate the danger of naïve interpretation of closed-model estimates. This method allows further inferences to be made concerning the spatial causes of closure violation, and the degree of bias caused by closure violation to be explored.

A grizzly bear from the Middle Wisconsin of Woodbridge, Ontario

1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Churcher ◽  
Alan V. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Bone Fragment ◽  
Mammuthus Primigenius ◽  
Ursus Arctos Horribilis ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Lake Simcoe ◽  
Left Humerus ◽  
Woolly Mammoth

The distal end of the left humerus of a grizzly bear, Ursus arctos, has been recovered from above the Early Wisconsin Sunnybrook Till at Woodbridge, Ontario, from the same horizon that previously has yielded remains of the woolly mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius. The age of these specimens is estimated at 40 000–50 000 years BP, within the mid-Wisconsin, Port Talbot Interstadial. The only other recognized Canadian record of a grizzly bear east of Manitoba is from a gravel sequence at Barrie, near Lake Simcoe, Ontario, dated from a bone fragment to 11 700 ± 250 years BP. A specimen recovered in Toronto in 1913 from an Early Wisconsin horizon is also considered to represent the grizzly. Bears of the grizzly type, Ursus arctos-horribilis were present in Ontario before and after the Early and Late Wisconsin ice advances.

scholarly journals Gray Wolves, Canis lupus, Killed by Cougars, Puma concolor, and a Grizzly Bear, Ursus arctos, in Montana, Alberta, and Wyoming

2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Jimenez ◽  
Valpa J. Asher ◽  
Carita Bergman ◽  
Edward E. Bangs ◽  
Susannah P. Woodruff
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Puma Concolor ◽  
Western United States ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Grey Wolf ◽  
Gray Wolves ◽  
Large Predators

Four cases where large predators caused Grey Wolf (Canis lupus) mortality are recorded. We describe two incidents of Cougars (Puma concolar) killing Wolves in Montana and one incident of a Cougar killing a Wolf in Alberta. We report the first recorded incident of a Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) killing a Wolf in the western United States.

Spatially explicit carrying capacity estimates to inform species specific recovery objectives: Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) recovery in the North Cascades

2018 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Lyons ◽  
William L. Gaines ◽  
Peter H. Singleton ◽  
Wayne F. Kasworm ◽  
Michael F. Proctor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
North Cascades ◽  
The North ◽  
Species Specific ◽  
Capacity Estimates

scholarly journals Novel range overlap of three ursids in the Canadian subarctic

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Andrew Clark ◽  
Ryan Brook ◽  
Chelsea Oliphant-Reskanski ◽  
Michel P. Laforge ◽  
Kiva Olson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
American Black Bear ◽  
Remote Cameras ◽  
American Black ◽  
Range Overlap ◽  
Conservation Concern ◽  
Response To Environmental Change ◽  
First Time

We describe for the first time in the peer-reviewed literature observations of American black bear (Ursus americanus Pallas, 1780), grizzly bear (Ursus arctos Linnaeus, 1758), and polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps, 1774) at the same locations. Using remote cameras we documented 401 bear-visits of all three species at three camps in Wapusk National Park, Canada, from 2011–2017. These observations add to a growing body of evidence that grizzlies are undergoing a substantial range increase in northern Canada and the timing of our observations suggests denning locally. Polar and grizzly bears are of conservation concern regionally and internationally, so from the literature we assessed the potential effects on conservation efforts from interactions between these three species. In aggregate, those effects are likely to be positive for grizzlies and weakly negative for black and polar bears; further research is needed. Range overlap of these three species in this dynamic ecotonal region should not be viewed as a threat to any of them, but rather as an ecological response to environmental change that needs to be better understood.

Predation on moose and caribou by radio-collared grizzly bears in east central Alaska

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 2492-2499 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Boertje ◽  
W. C. Gasaway ◽  
D. V. Grangaard ◽  
D. G. Kelleyhouse
Keyword(s):  
Important Implication ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Prey Availability ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
East Central ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Predation Rates

Radio-collared grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) were sighted daily for approximately 1-month periods during spring, summer, and fall to estimate predation rates. Predation rates on adult moose (Alces alces) were highest in spring, lowest in summer, and intermediate in fall. The highest kill rates were by male grizzlies killing cow moose during the calving period. We estimated that each adult male grizzly killed 3.3–3.9 adult moose annually, each female without cub(s) killed 0.6–0.8 adult moose and 0.9–1.0 adult caribou (Rangifer tarandus) annually, and each adult bear killed at least 5.4 moose calves annually. Grizzly predation rates on calves and grizzly density were independent of moose density and are probably more related to area-specific factors, e.g., availability of alternative foods. An important implication of our results is that managers should not allow moose densities to decline to low levels, because grizzlies can have a greater relative impact on low- than on high-density moose populations and because grizzly predation can be difficult to reduce. Grizzly bears were primarily predators, rather than scavengers, in this area of low prey availability (11 moose/grizzly bear); bears killed four times more animal biomass than they scavenged.

A study of predominant aerobic microflora of black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in northwestern Alberta

1987 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 949-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Goatcher ◽  
M. W. Barrett ◽  
R. N. Coleman ◽  
A. W. L. Hawley ◽  
A. A. Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Soil Bacteria ◽  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Random Distribution ◽  
Ursus Americanus ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Black Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bears ◽  
Grizzly Bear ◽  
Streptococcus Species ◽  
Generic Composition

Swab specimens were obtained from nasal, rectal, and preputial or vaginal areas of 37 grizzly and 17 black bears, captured during May to June of 1981 to 1983, to determine the types and frequency of predominant aerobic microflora. Bacterial genera most frequently isolated from bears were Escherichia, Citrobacter, Hafnia, Proteus, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus species, comprising about 65% of the isolates. Erwinia, Xanthomonas, Agrobacterium, Rhizobium, and Gluconobacter/Acetobacter were also isolated but at lower frequencies (< 5%). Comparison of bacterial generic composition using similarity quotient values showed no appreciable differences between grizzly and black bear flora. Also, no outstanding differences in bacterial generic composition were observed among grizzly bear samples; however, differences were noted among black bear samples. Fungal genera most commonly encountered included Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula, Cladosporium, Penicillium, Sporobolomyces, and Candida. In general, the microflora of both bear types were marked by generic diversity and random distribution. The majority of microorganisms isolated from the plant samples in the study area were also found in bear samples. This observation and the presence of certain water and soil bacteria in samples from bears suggest that the predominant microflora of both grizzly and black bears were transient and probably influenced by their foraging habits and surrounding environments.

scholarly journals Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1180-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Louise Burt ◽  
David L. Borchers ◽  
Kurt J. Jenkins ◽  
Tiago A. Marques
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Methods ◽  
Distance Sampling ◽  
Line Transect ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
On Line

scholarly journals Exertional Myopathy in a Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) Captured by Leghold Snare

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 973-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Cattet ◽  
Gordon Stenhouse ◽  
Trent Bollinger
Keyword(s):  
Ursus Arctos ◽  
Grizzly Bear
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document