Abstract
Abstract 4810
Ex vivo expansion and manipulation of primitive hematopoietic cells has become a major goal in the experimental hematology, because of its potential relevance in the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at treating a diverse group of hematologic disorders. Osteoblasts, mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSC/MPC), adipocytes, reticular cells, endothelial cells and other stromal cells, have been implicated in regulation of HSC maintenance in endosteal and perivascular niches. These niches facilitate the signaling networks that control the balance between self-renewal and differentiation.
In the present study, we evaluated and compared the effects of three different stromal feeder layers on expansion of HSPC derived from BM and cord blood (CB): BM mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), osteoblast-differentiated BM mesenchymal stem cells (Ost-MSC) and adipocyte-differentiated BM mesenchymal stem cells (Ad-MSC). BM-MSC cultures were established from plastic adherent BM cell fractions and analyzed for immunophenotype, frequency of colony forming units (CFU-F), frequency of osteo- (CFU-Ost) and adipo- (CFU-Ad) lineage progenitors. Cultures with similar clonogenity (CFU-F: 26,4 ± 4,5%) and progenitors frequency (CFU-Ost: 14,7 ± 4,5%; CFU-Ad: 13,3 ± 4,5%) were selected for co-culture experiments. All MSC were positive for stromal cell-associated markers (CD105, CD90, CD166, CD73) and negative for hematopoietic lineage cells markers (CD34, CD19, CD14, CD45). CD34+ cells were separared from BM and CB samples by magnetic cell sorting (MACS) and analyzed for CD34, CD38 and CD45 expression.
Feeder layers (MSC, Ost-MSC, Ad-MSC) were prepared in 24-well plates prior to co-culture experiments: MSCs (4×104 cells/well) were cultured for 24 h and either used for following experiments or stimulated to differentiate into either osteoblasts or adipoctes according to standard protocols. CD34+ cells (3500-10000 cells per well) were co-cultured in Stem Span media with or without a feeder layers and in the presence of cytokines (10 ng/mL Flt3-L, 10 ng/mL SCF, 10ng/mL IL-7) for 7 days. Expanded cells were analyzed for CD34, CD38 and CD45 expression.
Results are shown on figures 1 and 2. As expected, CB-derived HSPC expanded much more effectively than BM-derived HSPC. The similar levels of expansion were observed for both, the total number of HSPC, and more primitive CD34+CD38- fraction in the presence of all three feeder layers. Ost-MSC supported CB-derived HSPC slightly better than MSC and Ad-MSC which is in a good agreement with data from literature (Mishima et.al., European Journal of Haematology, 2010), but difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, whereas BM-MSC feeder facilitated CD34+CD38- fraction in BM-derived HSPC, Adipocyte-differentiated MSC and osteoblast-differentiated MSC failed to support BM-derived CD34+CD38- expansion (11,4 ±.4 folds for MSC vs 0,9 ±.0,14 for Ad-MSC, n=5, p<0,01 and 0,92 ±.0,1 for Ost-MSC, n=5, p<0,01).Figure 1.Cord Blood HSPC ex vivo expansionFigure 1. Cord Blood HSPC ex vivo expansionFigure 2.Bone Marrow HSPC ex vivo expansionFigure 2. Bone Marrow HSPC ex vivo expansion
Conclusion:
BM- and CB-derived CD34+CD38- cells differ in their dependence of bone marrow stroma. Coctail of growth factors facilitate CB HSPC expansion irrespective of lineage differentiation of supporting MSC feeder layer. In contrast, primitive BM CD34+CD38- HSPC were able to expand only on not differentiated MSC.
Disclosures:
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Epidermal Growth Factor as a Candidate for Ex Vivo Expansion of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells