scholarly journals Progesterone Action in Human Tissues: Regulation by Progesterone Receptor (PR) Isoform Expression, Nuclear Positioning and Coregulator Expression

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.07009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Scarpin ◽  
J. Dinny Graham ◽  
Patricia A. Mote ◽  
Christine L. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Reproductive Function ◽  
Large Family ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Normal Female ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Distribution

Progesterone is a critical regulator of normal female reproductive function, with diverse tissue-specific effects in the human. The effects of progesterone are mediated by its nuclear receptor (PR) that is expressed as two isoforms, PRA and PRB, which are virtually identical except that PRA lacks 164 amino acids that are present at the N-terminus of PRB. Considerable in vitro evidence suggests that the two PRs are functionally distinct and in animals, tissue-specific distribution patterns of PRA and PRB may account for some of the diversity of progesterone effects. In the human, PRA and PRB are equivalently expressed in most target cells, suggesting that alternative mechanisms control the diversity of progesterone actions. PR mediates the effects of progesterone by association with a range of coregulatory proteins and binding to specific target sequences in progesterone-regulated gene promoters. Ligand activation of PR results in redistribution into discrete subnuclear foci that are detectable by immunofluorescence, probably representing aggregates of multiple transcriptionally active PR-coregulator complexes. PR foci are aberrant in cancers, suggesting that the coregulator composition and number of complexes is altered. A large family of coregulators is now described and the range of proteins known to bind PR exceeds the complement required for transcriptional activation, suggesting that in the human, tissue-specific coregulator expression may modulate progesterone response. In this review, we examine the role of nuclear localization of PR, coregulator association and tissue-specific expression in modulating progesterone action in the human.

scholarly journals Cell-specific expression of NADPH-dependent cytosolic 3,5,3'-triiodo-L-thyronine-binding protein (p38CTBP)

2003 ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Suzuki ◽  
J Mori ◽  
M Kobayashi ◽  
T Inagaki ◽  
H Inaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Western Blotting ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Intracellular Localization ◽  
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate ◽  
Neural Cells ◽  
Cardiac Muscle Cells ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Distribution

We have previously shown that cytosolic 3,5,3'-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3)-binding protein (CTBP) possesses a high affinity for T3 binding in the presence of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate in vitro, and that p38CTBP increases intracellular content of T3, and suppresses T3-mediated transactivity. Screening of mRNA expression in 73 different human tIssues has demonstrated that p38CTBP mRNA is expressed at high levels in brain and heart. We have examined the intracellular localization and tissue-specific distribution of this protein by using a specific antibody against human p38CTBP. Western blotting and immunoprecipitation studies have shown that the antibody recognizes human p38CTBP. Interaction of p38CTBP with the antibody did not affect the T3-binding activity of p38CTBP, and its dimer formation in vitro. Western blotting analysis has shown that p38CTBP is expressed in brain and heart predominantly, similar to the distribution of mRNA. Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated p38CTBP in neural cells and cardiac muscle cells. p38CTBP localizes in cytoplasm rather than in nuclei in neural cells. The evidence for the presence of tIssue-specific localization of p38CTBP has indicated that p38CTBP has a tIssue-specific function, such as the regulation of T3 delivery from cytoplasm to nuclei.

Non-Viral Vectors for Gene Delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Bansal ◽  
Himanshu
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Viral Vectors ◽  
Transfection Efficiency ◽  
Gene Transfection ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Naked Dna

Introduction: Gene therapy has emerged out as a promising therapeutic pave for the treatment of genetic and acquired diseases. Gene transfection into target cells using naked DNA is a simple and safe approach which has been further improved by combining vectors or gene carriers. Both viral and non-viral approaches have achieved a milestone to establish this technique, but non-viral approaches have attained a significant attention because of their favourable properties like less immunotoxicity and biosafety, easy to produce with versatile surface modifications, etc. Literature is rich in evidences which revealed that undoubtedly, non–viral vectors have acquired a unique place in gene therapy but still there are number of challenges which are to be overcome to increase their effectiveness and prove them ideal gene vectors. Conclusion: To date, tissue specific expression, long lasting gene expression system, enhanced gene transfection efficiency has been achieved with improvement in delivery methods using non-viral vectors. This review mainly summarizes the various physical and chemical methods for gene transfer in vitro and in vivo.

Human globin gene promoter sequences are sufficient for specific expression of a hybrid gene transfected into tissue culture cells

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 398-402
Author(s):  
T Rutherford ◽  
A W Nienhuis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Globin Gene ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Globin Genes ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
Erythroleukemia Cells ◽  
Murine Erythroleukemia

The contribution of the human globin gene promoters to tissue-specific transcription was studied by using globin promoters to transcribe the neo (G418 resistance) gene. After transfection into different cell types, neo gene expression was assayed by scoring colony formation in the presence of G418. In K562 human erythroleukemia cells, which express fetal and embryonic globin genes but not the adult beta-globin gene, the neo gene was expressed strongly from a fetal gamma- or embryonic zeta-globin gene promoter but only weakly from the beta promoter. In murine erythroleukemia cells which express the endogenous mouse beta genes, the neo gene was strongly expressed from both beta and gamma promoters. In two nonerythroid cell lines, human HeLa cells and mouse 3T3 fibroblasts, the globin gene promoters did not allow neo gene expression. Globin-neo genes were integrated in the erythroleukemia cell genomes mostly as a single copy per cell and were transcribed from the appropriate globin gene cap site. We conclude that globin gene promoter sequences extending from -373 to +48 base pairs (bp) (relative to the cap site) for the beta gene, -385 to +34 bp for the gamma gene, and -555 to +38 bp for the zeta gene are sufficient for tissue-specific and perhaps developmentally specific transcription.

Homeotic response elements are tightly linked to tissue-specific elements in a transcriptional enhancer of the teashirt gene

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 2799-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. McCormick ◽  
N. Core ◽  
S. Kerridge ◽  
M.P. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancer ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Conserved Sequences

Along the anterior-posterior axis of animal embryos, the choice of cell fates, and the organization of morphogenesis, is regulated by transcription factors encoded by clustered homeotic or ‘Hox’ genes. Hox genes function in both epidermis and internal tissues by regulating the transcription of target genes in a position- and tissue-specific manner. Hox proteins can have distinct targets in different tissues; the mechanisms underlying tissue and homeotic protein specificity are unknown. Light may be shed by studying the organization of target gene enhancers. In flies, one of the target genes is teashirt (tsh), which encodes a zinc finger protein. tsh itself is a homeotic gene that controls trunk versus head development. We identified a tsh gene enhancer that is differentially activated by Hox proteins in epidermis and mesoderm. Sites where Antennapedia (Antp) and Ultrabithorax (Ubx) proteins bind in vitro were mapped within evolutionarily conserved sequences. Although Antp and Ubx bind to identical sites in vitro, Antp activates the tsh enhancer only in epidermis while Ubx activates the tsh enhancer in both epidermis and in somatic mesoderm. We show that the DNA elements driving tissue-specific transcriptional activation by Antp and Ubx are separable. Next to the homeotic protein-binding sites are extensive conserved sequences likely to control tissue activation by different homeodomain proteins. We propose that local interactions between homeotic proteins and other factors effect activation of targets in proper cell types.

scholarly journals Characteristics and Expression Pattern of MYC Genes in Triticum aestivum, Oryza sativa, and Brachypodium distachyon

Plants ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoukun Chen ◽  
Hongyan Zhao ◽  
Tengli Luo ◽  
Yue Liu ◽  
Xiaojun Nie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Brachypodium Distachyon ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Interaction Domain ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain

Myelocytomatosis oncogenes (MYC) transcription factors (TFs) belong to basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TF family and have a special bHLH_MYC_N domain in the N-terminal region. Presently, there is no detailed and systematic analysis of MYC TFs in wheat, rice, and Brachypodium distachyon. In this study, 26 TaMYC, 7 OsMYC, and 7 BdMYC TFs were identified and their features were characterized. Firstly, they contain a JAZ interaction domain (JID) and a putative transcriptional activation domain (TAD) in the bHLH_MYC_N region and a BhlH region in the C-terminal region. In some cases, the bHLH region is followed by a leucine zipper region; secondly, they display tissue-specific expression patterns: wheat MYC genes are mainly expressed in leaves, rice MYC genes are highly expressed in stems, and B. distachyon MYC genes are mainly expressed in inflorescences. In addition, three types of cis-elements, including plant development/growth-related, hormone-related, and abiotic stresses-related were identified in different MYC gene promoters. In combination with the previous studies, these results indicate that MYC TFs mainly function in growth and development, as well as in response to stresses. This study laid a foundation for the further functional elucidation of MYC genes.

Cloning of rat and mouse aquaporin-2 gene promoters and identification of a negative cis-regulatory element

1997 ◽  
Vol 273 (2) ◽  
pp. F264-F273 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Rai ◽  
S. Uchida ◽  
F. Marumo ◽  
S. Sasaki
Keyword(s):  
Specific Binding ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Nuclear Extract ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Cis Element ◽  
Aquaporin 2 ◽  
Gene Assay

The promoters of rat and mouse aquaporin-2 (AQP-2) genes were cloned and compared with that of human genes. Nucleotide identity up to -593 bp was 62%, and consensus sequences such as TATA box and adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate responsive element were conserved. Deoxyribonuclease I footprint assay revealed a footprinted region at -210 to -184 bp in rat AQP-2 gene promoter produced by nuclear extract from nonexpressing (liver) tissue. The sequence of this region included a GATA motif but otherwise showed no homology with any other previously known cis-elements. Electromobility shift assay and ultraviolet cross-linking analysis confirmed that specific binding proteins to this element were present in kidney, spleen, and liver and that these proteins were distinct from GATA factors. Both deletion and mutation of this cis-element abolished the protein DNA binding and increased promoter activity in in vitro reporter gene assay using rat cultured hepatocyte Ac2F cells, suggesting the negative regulatory role of this cis-element. These results indicate that tissue-specific expression of AQP-2 gene may in part be regulated by this novel negative acting cis-element.

scholarly journals Participation of the yeast activator Abf1 in meiosis-specific expression of the HOP1 gene.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2777-2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Gailus-Durner ◽  
J Xie ◽  
C Chintamaneni ◽  
A K Vershon
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Autonomously Replicating Sequence

The meiosis-specific gene HOP1, which encodes a component of the synaptonemal complex, is controlled through two regulatory elements, UASH and URS1H. Sites similar to URS1H have been identified in the promoter region of virtually every early meiosis-specific gene, as well as in many promoters of nonmeiotic genes, and it has been shown that the proteins that bind to this site function to regulate meiotic and nonmeiotic transcription. Sites similar to the UASH site have been found in a number of meiotic and nonmeiotic genes as well. Since it has been shown that UASH functions as an activator site in vegetative haploid cells, it seemed likely that the factors binding to this site regulate both meiotic and nonmeiotic transcription. We purified the factor binding to the UASH element of the HOP1 promoter. Sequence analysis identified the protein as Abf1 (autonomously replicating sequence-binding factor 1), a multifunctional protein involved in DNA replication, silencing, and transcriptional regulation. We show by mutational analysis of the UASH site, that positions outside of the proposed UASH consensus sequence (TNTGN[A/T]GT) are required for DNA binding in vitro and transcriptional activation in vivo. A new UASH consensus sequence derived from this mutational analysis closely matches a consensus Abf1 binding site. We also show that an Abf1 site from a nonmeiotic gene can replace the function of the UASH site in the HOP1 promoter. Taken together, these results show that Abf1 functions to regulate meiotic gene expression.

scholarly journals The macrophage transcription factor PU.1 directs tissue-specific expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 373-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E Zhang ◽  
C J Hetherington ◽  
H M Chen ◽  
D G Tenen
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor

The macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor is expressed in a tissue-specific fashion from two distinct promoters in monocytes/macrophages and the placenta. In order to further understand the transcription factors which play a role in the commitment of multipotential progenitors to the monocyte/macrophage lineage, we have initiated an investigation of the factors which activate the M-CSF receptor very early during the monocyte differentiation process. Here we demonstrate that the human monocytic M-CSF receptor promoter directs reporter gene activity in a tissue-specific fashion. Since one of the few transcription factors which have been implicated in the regulation of monocyte genes is the macrophage- and B-cell-specific PU.1 transcription factor, we investigated whether PU.1 binds and activates the M-CSF receptor promoter. Here we demonstrate that both in vitro-translated PU.1 and PU.1 from nuclear extracts bind to a specific site in the M-CSF receptor promoter just upstream from the major transcription initiation site. Mutations in this site which eliminate PU.1 binding decrease M-CSF receptor promoter activity significantly in macrophage cell lines only. Furthermore, PU.1 transactivates the M-CSF receptor promoter in nonmacrophage cells. These results suggest that PU.1 plays a major role in macrophage gene regulation and development by directing the expression of a receptor for a key macrophage growth factor.

scholarly journals Synergistic transcriptional activation by CTF/NF-I and the estrogen receptor involves stabilized interactions with a limiting target factor.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2937-2945 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Martinez ◽  
Y Dusserre ◽  
W Wahli ◽  
N Mermod
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain

Transcription initiation at eukaryotic protein-coding gene promoters is regulated by a complex interplay of site-specific DNA-binding proteins acting synergistically or antagonistically. Here, we have analyzed the mechanisms of synergistic transcriptional activation between members of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor/nuclear factor I (CTF/NF-I) family and the estrogen receptor. By using cotransfection experiments with HeLa cells, we show that the proline-rich transcriptional activation domain of CTF-1, when fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, synergizes with each of the two estrogen receptor-activating regions. Cooperative DNA binding between the GAL4-CTF-1 fusion and the estrogen receptor does not occur in vitro, and in vivo competition experiments demonstrate that both activators can be specifically inhibited by the overexpression of a proline-rich competitor, indicating that a common limiting factor is mediating their transcriptional activation functions. Furthermore, the two activators functioning synergistically are much more resistant to competition than either factor alone, suggesting that synergism between CTF-1 and the estrogen receptor is the result of a stronger tethering of the limiting target factor(s) to the two promoter-bound activators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document