scholarly journals Function of retinoic acid receptors during embryonic development

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.07002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Mark ◽  
Norbert B. Ghyselinck ◽  
Pierre Chambon
Keyword(s):  
Gene Networks ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Prenatal Development ◽  
Postnatal Life ◽  
Active Metabolites ◽  
Physiological Functions ◽  
Retinoid Receptors

Retinoids, the active metabolites of vitamin A, regulate complex gene networks involved in vertebrate morphogenesis, growth, cellular differentiation and homeostasis. Studies performed in vitro, using either acellular systems or transfected cells, have shown that retinoid actions are mediated through heterodimers between the RAR and RXR nuclear receptors. However, in vitro studies indicate what is possible, but not necessarily what is actually occurring in vivo, because they are performed under non-physiological conditions. Therefore, genetic approaches in the animal have been be used to determine the physiological functions of retinoid receptors. Homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells has been used to generate germline null mutations of the RAR- and RXR-coding genes in the mouse. As reviewed here, the generation of such germline mutations, combined with pharmacological approaches to block the RA signalling pathway, has provided genetic evidence that RAR/RXR heterodimers are indeed the functional units transducing the RA signal during prenatal development. However, due to (i) the complexity in “hormonal” signalling through transduction by the multiple RARs and RXRs, (ii) the functional redundancies (possibly artefactually generated by the mutations) within receptor isotypes belonging to a given family, and (iii) in utero or early postnatal lethality of certain germline null mutations, these genetic studies have failed to reveal all the physiological functions of RARs and RXRs, notably in adults. Spatio-temporally-controlled somatic mutations generated in given cell types/tissues and at chosen times during postnatal life, will be required to reveal all the functions of RAR and RXR throughout the lifetime of the mouse.

Functions of RARs and RXRs in vivo: Genetic dissection of the retinoid signaling pathway

2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1709-1732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Mark ◽  
Pierre Chambon
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Gene Networks ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Postnatal Life ◽  
Active Metabolites ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Retinoid Signaling

Retinoids, the active metabolites of vitamin A, regulate complex gene networks involved in vertebrate morphogenesis, growth, cellular differentiation, and homeostasis. They are used for the treatment of skin disorders and as chemopreventive agents for certain cancers. Molecular biology and genetic studies performed during the last 15 years in vitro, using either acellular systems or transfected cells, have shown that retinoid actions are mediated through heterodimers between the 8 major RARα, β, and γ; isoforms and the 6 major RXRα, β and γ isoforms that belong to the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily, and act as ligand-dependent transcriptional regulators. Furthermore, RXRs not only heterodimerize with RARs, but also with numerous other members of the NR superfamily. As in vitro studies are carried out under nonphysiological conditions, they only indicate what is possible, but not necessarily what is actually occurring in vivo. Therefore, mutations have been introduced by homologous recombination (HR) in F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, a cell-autonomous system that differentiates in the presence of RA, in order to disrupt RAR and RXR genes and establish their cellular and molecular functions in RA-induced differentiation. However, genetic approaches in the animal should be used to determine the function of retinoid receptors under truly physiological conditions. HR in embryonic stem (ES) cells, has therefore been used to generate null mutations of the various RARs and RXRs in the mouse germline. As reviewed here, the generation of such RAR and RXR germline mutations, combined with pharmacological approaches to block the RA signaling pathway, has provided many valuable insights on the developmental functions of RA receptors. However, due to (i) the complexity in "hormonal" signaling through transduction by the multiple RARs and RXRs, (ii) the functional redundancies (possibly artefactually generated by the mutations) within receptor isotypes belonging to a given gene family, and (iii) in utero or postnatal lethality of certain germline null mutations, these genetic studies through germline mutagenesis have failed to reveal many of the physiological functions of RARs and RXRs, notably in adults. We conclude that spatio-temporally controlled somatic mutations generated in animal models in given cell-types/tissues and at chosen times during pre- and postnatal life, are required to reveal the physiological and pathophysiological functions of the receptor genes involved in the retinoid signaling pathway throughout the life of the mouse.

scholarly journals From blastocyst to gastrula: gene regulatory networks of embryonic stem cells and early mouse embryogenesis

2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1657) ◽  
pp. 20130542 ◽  
Author(s):  
David-Emlyn Parfitt ◽  
Michael M. Shen
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Gene Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Network Models ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Mammalian Development ◽  
A Genome

To date, many regulatory genes and signalling events coordinating mammalian development from blastocyst to gastrulation stages have been identified by mutational analyses and reverse-genetic approaches, typically on a gene-by-gene basis. More recent studies have applied bioinformatic approaches to generate regulatory network models of gene interactions on a genome-wide scale. Such models have provided insights into the gene networks regulating pluripotency in embryonic and epiblast stem cells, as well as cell-lineage determination in vivo . Here, we review how regulatory networks constructed for different stem cell types relate to corresponding networks in vivo and provide insights into understanding the molecular regulation of the blastocyst–gastrula transition.

scholarly journals Defining totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eszter Posfai ◽  
John Paul Schell ◽  
Adrian Janiszewski ◽  
Isidora Rovic ◽  
Alexander Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Pluripotent Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Totipotent Cell

AbstractTotipotency is the ability of a single cell to give rise to all the differentiated cells that build the conceptus, yet how to capture this property in vitro remains incompletely understood. Defining totipotency relies upon a variety of assays of variable stringency. Here we describe criteria to define totipotency. We illustrate how distinct criteria of increasing stringency can be used to judge totipotency by evaluating candidate totipotent cell types in the mouse, including early blastomeres and expanded or extended pluripotent stem cells. Our data challenge the notion that expanded or extended pluripotent states harbor increased totipotent potential relative to conventional embryonic stem cells under in vivo conditions.

Physiological Functions of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor β

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap G. Neels ◽  
Paul A. Grimaldi
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor ◽  
In Vivo Models ◽  
Physiological Functions ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Inflammatory Conditions

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, PPARα, PPARβ, and PPARγ, are a family of transcription factors activated by a diversity of molecules including fatty acids and fatty acid metabolites. PPARs regulate the transcription of a large variety of genes implicated in metabolism, inflammation, proliferation, and differentiation in different cell types. These transcriptional regulations involve both direct transactivation and interaction with other transcriptional regulatory pathways. The functions of PPARα and PPARγ have been extensively documented mainly because these isoforms are activated by molecules clinically used as hypolipidemic and antidiabetic compounds. The physiological functions of PPARβ remained for a while less investigated, but the finding that specific synthetic agonists exert beneficial actions in obese subjects uplifted the studies aimed to elucidate the roles of this PPAR isoform. Intensive work based on pharmacological and genetic approaches and on the use of both in vitro and in vivo models has considerably improved our knowledge on the physiological roles of PPARβ in various cell types. This review will summarize the accumulated evidence for the implication of PPARβ in the regulation of development, metabolism, and inflammation in several tissues, including skeletal muscle, heart, skin, and intestine. Some of these findings indicate that pharmacological activation of PPARβ could be envisioned as a therapeutic option for the correction of metabolic disorders and a variety of inflammatory conditions. However, other experimental data suggesting that activation of PPARβ could result in serious adverse effects, such as carcinogenesis and psoriasis, raise concerns about the clinical use of potent PPARβ agonists.

Reversine: A Synthetic Purine with a Dual Activity as a Cell Dedifferentiating Agent and a Selective Anticancer Drug

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 3448-3462
Author(s):  
Marco Piccoli ◽  
Andrea Ghiroldi ◽  
Michelle M. Monasky ◽  
Federica Cirillo ◽  
Giuseppe Ciconte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Adult Cell ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

The development of new therapeutic applications for adult and embryonic stem cells has dominated regenerative medicine and tissue engineering for several decades. However, since 2006, induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) have taken center stage in the field, as they promised to overcome several limitations of the other stem cell types. Nonetheless, other promising approaches for adult cell reprogramming have been attempted over the years, even before the generation of iPSCs. In particular, two years before the discovery of iPSCs, the possibility of synthesizing libraries of large organic compounds, as well as the development of high-throughput screenings to quickly test their biological activity, enabled the identification of a 2,6-disubstituted purine, named reversine, which was shown to be able to reprogram adult cells to a progenitor-like state. Since its discovery, the effect of reversine has been confirmed on different cell types, and several studies on its mechanism of action have revealed its central role in inhibitory activity on several kinases implicated in cell cycle regulation and cytokinesis. These key features, together with its chemical nature, suggested a possible use of the molecule as an anti-cancer drug. Remarkably, reversine exhibited potent cytotoxic activity against several tumor cell lines in vitro and a significant effect in decreasing tumor progression and metastatization in vivo. Thus, 15 years since its discovery, this review aims at critically summarizing the current knowledge to clarify the dual role of reversine as a dedifferentiating agent and anti-cancer drug.

Embryonic Stem Cells Differentiated in Vitro as a Novel Source of Cells for Transplantation

1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Dinsmore ◽  
Judson Ratliff ◽  
Terry Deacon ◽  
Peyman Pakzaba ◽  
Douglas Jacoby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Skeletal Myoblasts ◽  
Muscle Cell Type

The controlled differentiation of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells into near homogeneous populations of both neurons and skeletal muscle cells that can survive and function in vivo after transplantation is reported. We show that treatment of pluripotent ES cells with retinoic acid (RA) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) induce differentiation of these cells into highly enriched populations of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) expressing neurons and skeletal myoblasts, respectively. For neuronal differentiation, RA alone is sufficient to induce ES cells to differentiate into neuronal cells that show properties of postmitotic neurons both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo function of RA-induced neuronal cells was demonstrated by transplantation into the quinolinic acid lesioned striatum of rats (a rat model for Huntington's disease), where cells integrated and survived for up to 6 wk. The response of embryonic stem cells to DMSO to form muscle was less dramatic than that observed for RA. DMSO-induced ES cells formed mixed populations of muscle cells composed of cardiac, smooth, and skeletal muscle instead of homogeneous populations of a single muscle cell type. To determine whether the response of ES cells to DMSO induction could be further controlled, ES cells were stably transfected with a gene coding for the muscle-specific regulatory factor, MyoD. When induced with DMSO, ES cells constitutively expressing high levels of MyoD differentiated exclusively into skeletal myoblasts (no cardiac or smooth muscle cells) that fused to form myotubes capable of spontaneous contraction. Thus, the specific muscle cell type formed was controlled by the expression of MyoD. These results provided evidence that the specific cell type formed (whether it be muscle, neuronal, or other cell types) can be controlled in vitro. Further, these results demonstrated that ES cells can provide a source of multiple differentiated cell types that can be used for transplantation.

scholarly journals In vivo and in vitro differentiation of uniparental embryonic stem cells into hematopoietic and neural cell types

Organogenesis ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid Eckardt ◽  
Timo C. Dinger ◽  
Satoshi Kurosaka ◽  
N. Adrian Leu ◽  
Albrecht M. Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neural Cell ◽  
In Vitro Differentiation

scholarly journals Progress and Future Challenges of Human Induced Pluripotents Stem Cell in Regenerative Medicine

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Anna Meiliana ◽  
Andi Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Somatic Cell ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Differentiation Potential ◽  
Human Ipscs

BACKGROUND: Less than a decade ago the prospect for reprogramming the human somatic cell looked bleak at best. It seemed that the only methods at our disposal for the generation of human isogenic pluripotent cells would have to involve somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Shinya Yamanaka in August 2006 in his publication (Cell) promised to change everything by showing that it was apparently very simple to revert the phenotype of a differentiated cell to a pluripotent one by overexpressing four transcription factors in murine fibroblasts.CONTENT: Mouse and human somatic cells can be genetically reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by the expression of a defined set of factors (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4, as well as Nanog and LIN28). iPSCs could be generated from mouse and human fibroblasts as well as from mouse liver, stomach, pancreatic, neural stem cells, and keratinocytes. Similarity of iPSCs and embryonic stem cells (ESCs) has been demonstrated in their morphology, global expression profiles, epigenetic status, as well as in vitro and in vivo differentiation potential for both mouse and human cells. Many techniques for human iPSCs (hiPSCs) derivation have been developed in recent years, utilizing different starting cell types, vector delivery systems, and culture conditions. A refined or perfected combination of these techniques might prove to be the key to generating clinically applicable hiPSCs.SUMMARY: iPSCs are a revolutionary tool for generating in vitro models of human diseases and may help us to understand the molecular basis of epigenetic reprogramming. Progress of the last four years has been truly amazing, almost verging on science fiction, but if we can learn to produce such cells cheaply and easily, and control their differentiation, our efforts to understand and fight disease will become more accessible, controllable and tailored. Ability to safely and efficiently derive hiPSCs may be of decisive importance to the future of regenerative medicine.KEYWORDS: iPSCs, ESC, reprogramming factor, reprogramming efficiency, somatic cell

scholarly journals Organoids: a promising new in vitro platform in livestock and veterinary research

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya K. Kar ◽  
Jerry M. Wells ◽  
Esther D. Ellen ◽  
Marinus F. W. te Pas ◽  
Ole Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Adult Stem Cells ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Companion Animals ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Veterinary Research

AbstractOrganoids are self-organizing, self-renewing three-dimensional cellular structures that resemble organs in structure and function. They can be derived from adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells. They contain most of the relevant cell types with a topology and cell-to-cell interactions resembling that of the in vivo tissue. The widespread and increasing adoption of organoid-based technologies in human biomedical research is testament to their enormous potential in basic, translational- and applied-research. In a similar fashion there appear to be ample possibilities for research applications of organoids from livestock and companion animals. Furthermore, organoids as in vitro models offer a great possibility to reduce the use of experimental animals. Here, we provide an overview of studies on organoids in livestock and companion animal species, with focus on the methods developed for organoids from a variety of tissues/organs from various animal species and on the applications in veterinary research. Current limitations, and ongoing research to address these limitations, are discussed. Further, we elaborate on a number of fields of research in animal nutrition, host-microbe interactions, animal breeding and genomics, and animal biotechnology, in which organoids may have great potential as an in vitro research tool.

The murine H19 gene is activated during embryonic stem cell differentiation in vitro and at the time of implantation in the developing embryo

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 1105-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Poirier ◽  
C.T. Chan ◽  
P.M. Timmons ◽  
E.J. Robertson ◽  
M.J. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Stem Cell Differentiation ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Embryoid Bodies ◽  
Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation ◽  
Cdna Clones ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Before And After

The differentiation in vitro of murine embryonic stem cells to embryoid bodies mimics events that occur in vivo shortly before and after embryonic implantation. We have used this system, together with differential cDNA cloning, to identify genes the expression of which is regulated during early embryogenesis. Here we describe the isolation of several such cDNA clones, one of which corresponds to the gene H19. This gene is activated in extraembryonic cell types at the time of implantation, suggesting that it may play a role at this stage of development, and is subsequently expressed in all of the cells of the mid-gestation embryo with the striking exception of most of those of the developing central and peripheral nervous systems. After birth, expression of this gene ceases or is dramatically reduced in all tissues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document