scholarly journals Solving Highly Constrained Search Problems with Quantum Computers

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 39-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hogg

A previously developed quantum search algorithm for solving 1-SAT problems in a single step is generalized to apply to a range of highly constrained k-SAT problems. We identify a bound on the number of clauses in satisfiability problems for which the generalized algorithm can find a solution in a constant number of steps as the number of variables increases. This performance contrasts with the linear growth in the number of steps required by the best classical algorithms, and the exponential number required by classical and quantum methods that ignore the problem structure. In some cases, the algorithm can also guarantee that insoluble problems in fact have no solutions, unlike previously proposed quantum search algorithms.

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 739-773
Author(s):  
TAD HOGG

The structure of satisfiability problems is used to improve search algorithms for quantum computers and to reduce their required coherence times by using only a single coherent evaluation of problem properties. The structure of random k-SAT allows the determination of the asymptotic average behavior of these algorithms, showing they improve on the quantum algorithms, such as amplitude amplification, that ignore detailed problem structure but remain exponential for hard problem instances. Compared to good classical methods, the algorithm performs better, on average, for weakly and highly constrained problems, but worse for hard cases. The analytic techniques introduced here apply also to other quantum algorithms, supplementing the limited evaluation possible with classical simulations, and showing how quantum computing can use the ensemble properties of NP search problems.


Author(s):  
Tad Hogg

Phase transitions have long been studied empirically in various combinatorial searches and theoretically in simplified models [91, 264, 301, 490]. The analogy with statistical physics [397], explored throughout this volume, shows how the many local choices made during search relate to global properties such as the resulting search cost. These studies have led to a better understanding of typical search behaviors [514] and improved search methods [195, 247, 261, 432, 433]. Among the current research questions in this field are the range of algorithms exhibiting the transition behavior and the algorithm-independent problem properties associated with the difficult instances concentrated near the transition. Towards this end, the present chapter examines quantum computer [123, 126, 158, 486] algorithms for nondeterministic polynomial (NP) combinatorial search problems [191]. As with many conventional methods, they exhibit the easy-hard-easy pattern of computational cost as the degree of constraint in the problems varies. We describe how properties of the search space affect the algorithms and identify an additional structural property, the energy gap, motivated by one quantum algorithm but applicable to a variety of techniques, both quantum and classical. Thus, the study of quantum search algorithms not only extends the range of algorithms exhibiting phase transitions, but also helps identify underlying structural properties. Specifically, the next two sections describe a class of hard search problems and the form of quantum search algorithms proposed to date. The remainder of the chapter presents algorithm behaviors, relevant problem structure, arid an approximate asymptotic analysis of their cost scaling. The final section discusses various open issues in designing and evaluating quantum algorithms, and relating their behavior to problem structure. The k-satisfiability (k -SAT) problem, as discussed earlier in this volume, consists of n Boolean variables and m clauses. A clause is a logical OR of k variables, each of which may be negated. A solution is an assignment, that is, a value for each variable, TRUE or FALSE, satisfying all the clauses. An assignment is said to conflict with any clause it does not satisfy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (21) ◽  
pp. 1950169
Author(s):  
Aihan Yin ◽  
Kemeng He ◽  
Ping Fan

Among many classic heuristic search algorithms, the Grover quantum search algorithm (QSA) can play a role of secondary acceleration. Based on the properties of the two-qubit Grover QSA, a quantum dialogue (QD) protocol is proposed. In addition, our protocol also utilizes the unitary operations and single-particle measurements. The transmitted quantum state (except for the decoy state used for detection) can transmit two-bits of security information simultaneously. Theoretical analysis shows that the proposed protocol has high security.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3&4) ◽  
pp. 251-261
Author(s):  
Srinivasan Arunachalam ◽  
Ronald de Wolf

In its usual form, Grover’s quantum search algorithm uses O( √ N) queries and O( √ N log N) other elementary gates to find a solution in an N-bit database. Grover in 2002 showed how to reduce the number of other gates to O( √ N log log N) for the special case where the database has a unique solution, without significantly increasing the number of queries. We show how to reduce this further to O( √ N log(r) N) gates for every constant r, and sufficiently large N. This means that, on average, the circuits between two queries barely touch more than a constant number of the log N qubits on which the algorithm acts. For a very large N that is a power of 2, we can choose r such that the algorithm uses essentially the minimal number π 4 √ N of queries, and only O( √ N log(log? N)) other gates.


1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (07) ◽  
pp. 1347-1361 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAD HOGG ◽  
CARLOS MOCHON ◽  
WOLFGANG POLAK ◽  
ELEANOR RIEFFEL

We present efficient implementations of a number of operations for quantum computers. These include controlled phase adjustments of the amplitudes in a superposition, permutations, approximations of transformations and generalizations of the phase adjustments to block matrix transformations. These operations generalize those used in proposed quantum search algorithms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Pooja Rao ◽  
Kwangmin Yu ◽  
Hyunkyung Lim ◽  
Vladimir Korepin

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1208-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Tsai ◽  
Fu-Yuen Hsiao ◽  
Yi-Ju Li ◽  
Jen-Fu Shen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document