Speech in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Long-Term Follow-Up after One- or Two-Stage Palate Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Staffan Morén ◽  
Maria Mani ◽  
Stålhammar Lilian ◽  
Per Åke Lindestad ◽  
Mats Holmström
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Objective To evaluate speech in adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate with one-stage or two-stage palate closure and compare the speech of the patients with that of a noncleft control group. Design Cross-sectional study with long-term follow-up. Participants/Setting All unilateral cleft lip and palate patients born from 1960 to 1987 and treated at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were invited (n = 109). Participation rate was 67% (n = 73) at a mean of 35 years after primary surgery. Forty-seven had been treated according to one-stage palate closure and 26 according to two-stage palate closure. Pharyngeal flap surgery had been performed in 11 of the 73 patients (15%). The noncleft control group consisted of 63 age-matched volunteers. Main Outcome Measure(s) Speech-language pathologists rated perceptual speech characteristics from blinded audio recordings. Results Among patients, seven (10%) presented with hypernasality, 12 (16%) had audible nasal emission and/or nasal turbulence, five (7%) had consonant production errors, one (2%) had glottal reinforcements/substitutions, and one (2%) had reduced intelligibility. Controls had no audible signs of velopharyngeal insufficiency and no quantifiable problems with the other speech production variables. No significant differences were identified between patients treated with one-stage and two-stage palate closure for any of the variables. Conclusions The prevalence of speech outcome indicative of velopharyngeal insufficiency among adult patients treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate was low but higher compared with individuals without cleft. Whether palatal closure is performed in one or two stages does not seem to affect the speech outcome at a mean age of 35 years.

WITHDRAWN—Administrative Duplicate Publication: Voice Quality in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Long-term Follow-up After 1- or 2-Stage Palate Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 758-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Staffan Morén ◽  
Per Åke Lindestad ◽  
Mats Holmström ◽  
Maria Mani
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Voice Quality ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Duplicate Publication ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Palate Repair

Morén, S., Lindestad, P. Å., Holmström, M., & Mani, M. (2018). Voice Quality in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Long-term Follow-up After 1- or 2-Stage Palate Repair. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 55(5), 758–768. DOI: 10.1177/1055665618754946 Article withdrawn by publisher. Due to an administrative error, this article was accidentally published in Volume 55 Issue 5 as well as Volume 55 Issue 8 of publishing year 2018 with different DOIs and different page numbers. The incorrect version of the article with DOI: 10.1177/1055665618754946 has been replaced with this correction notice. The correct and citable version of the article remains: Morén, S., Lindestad, P. Å., Holmström, M., & Mani, M. (2018). Voice Quality in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Long-Term Follow-Up After One- or Two-Stage Palate Repair. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 55(8), 1103–1114. DOI: 10.1177/1055665618764521

Short- and Long-Term Effects of Late Maxillary Advancement With the Liou-Alt-RAMEC Protocol in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Costanza Meazzini ◽  
Laura B. Zappia ◽  
Chiara Tortora ◽  
Luca Autelitano ◽  
Roberto Tintinelli
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Short And Long Term

Objective: The objective of this retrospective longitudinal study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of the application of the Liou Alt-RAMEC (alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction) technique, a late orthopedic maxillary protraction technique, with intraoral anchorage, in patients with cleft. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were consecutively treated with the Alt-RAMEC technique. The average age of the patients was 11.7 years (10.3-13.2 years) before protraction and 18.3 years (17.4-21.1 years) at long-term follow-up. A sample of nontreated patients with UCLP was used as a control group. It was matched for sex, skeletal class III, and age (11.3 years). The control sample had records at the end of growth (18.7 years). Results: The sagittal advancement of A-point, after the application of the technique, was 5.7 (2.17) mm. Some mandibular dentoalveolar and positional adaptation was noted. The position of the maxilla was stable in the long term. On the other hand, the UCLP control group showed hardly any growth at the maxillary level during the long-term follow-up period. Conclusion: Our results showed that the Alt-RAMEC technique, performed at the correct time, with a double-hinged expander, followed by class III spring or elastic traction, 24 hours per day, allows for satisfactory maxillary protraction, with, at this stage, apparently stable long-term results. Nevertheless, as only 50% of the patients had long-term follow-up data, we are still unable to predict the percentage of patients which will not eventually need orthognathic surgery.

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-Up After Maxillary Sinus Balloon Sinuplasty and ESS

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132098603
Author(s):  
Anni Koskinen ◽  
Marie Lundberg ◽  
Markus Lilja ◽  
Jyri Myller ◽  
Matti Penttilä ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Balloon Sinuplasty ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Objectives: The aim of this controlled follow-up study was to compare the need for revision surgery, long-term efficacy, and satisfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis patients who had undergone maxillary sinus operation with either balloon sinuplasty or traditional endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) technique. Methods: Thirty-nine ESS patients and 36 balloon patients of our previously described cohort, who had been primarily operated in 2008 to 2010, were contacted by phone. Symptoms, satisfaction, and need for revision surgery were asked. In addition, we collected data of patients who had undergone primary maxillary sinus balloon sinuplasty in the Helsinki University Hospital during the years 2005 to 2019. As a control group, we collected data of patients who had undergone primary maxillary sinus ESS at 3 Finnish University Hospitals, and 1 Central Hospital in years 2005, 2008, and 2011. Results: Altogether, 77 balloon patients and 82 ESS patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 5.3 years in balloon group and 9.8 years in ESS group. Revision surgery was performed on 17 balloon patients and 6 ESS patients. In the survival analysis, the balloon sinuplasty associated significantly with a higher risk of revision surgery compared to ESS. According to the phone interviews, 82% of ESS patients and 75% of balloon patients were very satisfied with the primary operation. Conclusion: Although the patient groups expressed equal satisfaction and change in symptoms after the operations, the need for revision surgery was higher after balloon sinuplasty than after ESS. This should be emphasized when counselling patients regarding surgical options.

scholarly journals Long term follow up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth

BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 328 (7453) ◽  
pp. 1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaare Christensen ◽  
Knud Juel ◽  
Anne Maria Herskind ◽  
Jeffrey C Murray
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Pantalar Arthrodesis: A Long-term Follow-up

Foot & Ankle ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene R. Barrett ◽  
Leslie C. Meyer ◽  
Edward W. Bray ◽  
Richard G. Taylor ◽  
Frank J. Kolb
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Spinal Cord Trauma ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Ankle Fusion ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The One

Eighty-three pantalar arthrodeses in 69 patients performed at the Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children, Greenville, South Carolina, between 1941 and 1977 were evaluated. Follow-up was from 1 to 33 years. Diagnoses included poliomyelitis, myelodysplasia, arthrogryposis, clubfeet, and extremity or spinal cord trauma. Methods of fusion were one-stage pantalar arthrodesis, two-stage triple ankle fusion, one-stage completion of prior tarsal fusion, and one-stage denudation of the talus. Pantalar arthrodesis is successful in the paralytic sensitive foot with a stable knee and there is no greater incidence of nonunion in the one-stage (Hunt-Thompson) procedure than in the two-stage procedure. Complications and failure of fusion are common in the insensitive foot.

Long-term Follow-up after Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Shing Huang ◽  
Pandurangan Harikrishnan ◽  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Ellen W. C. Ko ◽  
Eric J. W. Liou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Anterior Nasal Spine ◽  
Distraction Device ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The University ◽  
Maxillary Distraction

Objective: To evaluate the changes in maxillary position after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in six growing children with cleft lip and palate. Design: Retrospective, longitudinal study on maxillary changes at A point, anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, central incisor, and first molar. Setting: The University Hospital Craniofacial Center. Main Outcome Measure: Cephalometric radiographs were used to measure the maxillary position immediately after distraction, at 6 months, and more than 1 year after distraction. Results: After maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction device, the maxilla (A point) on average moved forward 9.7 mm and downward 3.5 mm immediately after distraction, moved backward 0.9 mm and upward 2.0 mm after 6 months postoperatively, and then moved further backward 2.3 mm and downward 6.8 mm after more than 1 year from the predistraction position. Conclusion: In most cases, maxilla moved forward at distraction and started to move backward until 1 year after distraction, but remained forward, as compared with predistraction position. Maxilla also moved downward during distraction and upward in 6 months, but started descending in 1 year. There also was no further forward growth of the maxilla after distraction in growing children with clefts.

Voice Quality in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1103-1114
Author(s):  
Staffan Morén ◽  
Per Åke Lindestad ◽  
Mats Holmström ◽  
Maria Mani
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Voice Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: The aim of the current study was to assess voice quality among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), after one- or two-stage palate closure, and compare it to a noncleft control group. Study Design: Cross-sectional study of patients with UCLP with long-term follow-up and noncleft controls. Participants: Patients with UCLP born between 1960 and 1987, treated at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were examined (n = 73) at a mean of 35 years after primary surgery. Forty-seven (64%) patients had been treated with 1-stage palate closure and 26 with 2-stage closure (36%). The noncleft control group consisted of 63 age-matched volunteers. Main Outcome Measures: Ratings of perceptual voice characteristics from blinded voice recordings with Swedish Voice Evaluation Approach method. Acoustic voice analysis including pitch and spectral measures. Results: Among the patients, the mean values for the 12 evaluated variables on a visual analog scale (0 = no abnormality, 100 = maximal abnormality) ranged between 0.1 and 17, and the mean for all was 6 mm. Voice variables were similar between patients and controls, except the total mean of all the perceptual voice variables, as well as “vocal fry”; both slightly lower among patients ( P = .018 and P = .009). There was no difference in any variable between patients treated with 1-stage and 2-stage palate closure. No clear relationship was found between velopharyngeal insufficiency and dysphonia. Conclusions: The voice characteristics among adults treated for UCLP in childhood are not different from those of individuals without cleft.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document