Timeliness of Primary Cleft Lip/Palate Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 588-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia H. Cassell ◽  
Julie Daniels ◽  
Robert E. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Vital Statistics ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Cleft Surgery

Objective: To examine the timeliness of primary cleft surgery, mean age at which surgery occurred, and factors associated with timely cleft surgery among children with orofacial clefts (OFCs). Design: Retrospective study of children with OFC using North Carolina vital statistics, birth defects registry, and Medicaid files. Participants/Patients: Medicaid-enrolled North Carolina resident children with OFC born from 1995 to 2002. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of children who underwent primary cleft surgery within 18 months of life, mean age when surgery occurred, and factors associated with timely surgery. Results: 406 children with OFC were continuously enrolled in Medicaid during the first 2 years of life. Overall, 78.1% of children had surgery within 18 months. About 90% of children with cleft lip (CL), 58.0% of children with cleft palate (CP), and 89.6% of children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) received timely cleft surgery; the mean age at which surgery occurred was 5 months. Children whose mothers received maternity care coordination, received prenatal care at a local health department, or lived in the southeastern or northeastern region of the state were more likely to receive timely cleft surgery. Conclusion: Most children with OFC in North Carolina born during this time period received primary cleft surgery within 18 months of life, but this varied by maternal demographics and other factors.

Factors Associated With Delay in Cleft Surgery at a Tertiary Children’s Hospital in a Major US Metropolitan City

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562198950
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Stoneburner ◽  
Naikhoba C. O. Munabi ◽  
Eric S. Nagengast ◽  
Madeleine S. Williams ◽  
Pedram Goel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Hispanic Ethnicity ◽  
Delayed Surgery ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Children's Hospital ◽  
Children’S Hospital ◽  
Syndromic Diagnosis ◽  
Cleft Surgery

Objective: To identify factors associated with late cleft repair at a US tertiary children’s hospital. Design: Retrospective study of children with CL/P using Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) records. Setting: US tertiary children’s hospital. Patients/Participants: Patients undergoing primary CL or CP repair at CHLA from 2009 to 2018. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of children who had delayed primary CL repair or CP repair using CHLA and American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) guidelines and factors associated with late surgery. Results: In total, 805 patients—503 (62.5%) who had CL repair, 302 (37.5%) CP repair—were included. Using CHLA protocol, 14.3% of patients seeking CL repair had delayed surgery. Delay was significantly associated with female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, Spanish primary language, government insurance, bilateral cleft, cleft lip and palate (CLP), and syndromic diagnosis. Using ACPA guidelines, 5.4% had delayed surgery. Female gender and syndromic diagnosis were significantly associated with delay and remained significant after adjustment for confounders in multivariate models. For CP repair, 60.3% of patients had delayed surgery using CHLA protocol. Cleft lip and palate diagnosis, complete cleft, syndromic diagnosis, and longer travel distance were significantly associated with delay. Using ACPA guidelines, 28.5% had delayed surgery; however, significant association with patient variables was not consistently observed. Conclusions: Delay in cleft surgery occurs most often for patients seeking CP repair and is associated with female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, Spanish language, government insurance, and bilateral CL, CLP, or syndromic diagnoses. Initiatives should aim to optimize cleft surgery delivery for these subpopulations.

scholarly journals Alveolar cleft and maximum cleft width as predictors for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gamal A. Abdelhameed ◽  
Wael A. Ghanem ◽  
Simon H. Armanios ◽  
Tamer Nabil Abdelrahman
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Difficult Laryngoscopy ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Pediatric Airway ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Width Measurements

Abstract Background Cleft lip and palate is one of the commonest congenital anomalies, which have an impact on feeding, speech, and dental development away from the significant psychosocial sequel. Early surgical repair aims to restore appearance and function, and the modern techniques can leave many defects undetectable. Therefore, the anesthetic challenge facing the pediatric airway with such abnormalities is still of a great impact. The aim of our study among 189 patients enrolled is to correlate alveolar gap and maximum cleft width measurements as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation in infants with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate aging from 1 to 6 months. As a secondary outcome, their weight is to be correlated too as another parameter. Results The alveolar gap and maximum cleft width are both of equal high predictive power (p value ≤ 0.001) with 100% sensitivity for both and specificity of 76.10% and 82.39% respectively, with a cut off value of ≤ 10 mm and 11 mm for these dimensions respectively, and odds ratio of incidence of difficult intubation is 4.18 and 5.68 respectively, while body weight ≤ 5.75 kg has an odds ratio of 2.32. Conclusion Alveolar cleft and maximum cleft width can be used as predictors for anticipation of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation infant patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate, while body weight ≤ 5.75 kg increases the risk more than twice.

Global Cleft Lip and Palate Outreach: A Google Trends Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110698
Author(s):  
Joshua P Weissman ◽  
Narainsai K Reddy ◽  
Nikhil D Shah ◽  
Arun K Gosain
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Google Trends ◽  
World Health ◽  
Patient Awareness ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Who Indicators ◽  
Cleft Surgery

Understanding patient awareness of cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and evaluating demand for necessary procedures may serve to better target future efforts in global outreach. We utilized internet search query data from Google Trends for the terms: “cleft lip,” “cleft palate,” “cleft lip and palate,” “cleft surgery,” and “cleft repair” from January 2004 to January 2021. Relative search volumes (RSV) recorded for the top 5 highest displaying countries and top 3 available regions within those countries were compared against global outreach by Operation Smile and Smile Train, as measured by the number of patients treated. World Health Organization (WHO) indicators were used to validate the RSV values for each country and better understand the current infrastructure and need for cleft care in those countries. Globally, there was an increase in RSV for the terms “cleft lip,” “cleft palate,” “cleft repair,” and “cleft surgery” between 2004 and 2021. For “cleft lip,” the countries with the highest displaying RSVs included: Ghana (100%), Zimbabwe (97%), Nepal (78%), the Philippines (64%), and Kenya (52%). Countries with high RSVs and moderate to high WHO indicators included Ghana, Kenya, India, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe. Countries with high RSVs and poor WHO indicators included Nepal and Pakistan. Some countries had specific regions with high search demand that are not currently targeted for global outreach. Using Google Trends’ data may help find more feasible locations and targeted care for efforts in global outreach with better patient awareness and turnout where demand for CL/P is increasing.

scholarly journals How is the face formed and when it goes wrong: In relation to Cleft Lip/Palate

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fozia Khan
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Normal Development ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Facial Defect ◽  
Facial Defects ◽  
The Face ◽  
Embryonic Life ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate

The normal development of the face relies upon the correct morphogenesis of structures in utero that usually occurs within the first trimester of embryonic life. The face is a very complex structure involving many genes and factors and with it being such a crucial part of life, both physically and aesthetically and therefore mentally, its important for everything to be just right. However, when the normal process doesn’t go to plan this results in dysmorphogenesis, which cleft lip and palate (CLP) is an example of as the lip/palate doesn’t fuse together and the infant is left with a gap. Although the exact cause of CLP is unknown, it is thought to be a mixture of genetics, environment and the teratogens the mothers are exposed to within the environment. This report will demonstrate the normal development of the face for the purpose of understanding how it goes wrong, resulting in CLP. Since there is still a lot to be understood about CLP it will also shed light on recent advances in relating SHH and certain genes as a possible cause for this dysmorphogenesis. The report will also briefly look at the relation of CLP with the genes associated with syndromic and non-syndromic diseases and the different types of CLP. There are many other facial defects that are a result of dysmorphogenesis, however as CLP is one of the most common yet poorly understood facial defect, it will be the main focus of this report.

Cleft surgery

2019 ◽  
pp. 143-152
Author(s):  
Johno Breeze ◽  
Sat Parmer ◽  
Niall McLeod
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Practical Knowledge ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Senior Clinician ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Contemporary Management ◽  
Cleft Surgery

This chapter contains eight clinical vivas on the subject of cleft surgery. This will provide candidates sitting the vivas component of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery FRCS examination with practical knowledge in the assessment and treatment of presentations such as cleft lip and palate as well as modalities of treatment including types of cleft lip repair. It will also provide insight for clinicians in allied specialties, such as otolaryngology and plastic surgery, in how to engage in a debate with a senior clinician in the contemporary management of such complex cases.

Should Cleft Surgery Always be Performed During the Matutine Time? Analysis of Early and Late Postoperative Complications in a Cleft Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1332-1335
Author(s):  
Daniel Velez Restrepo ◽  
Marilson Hideki Sato ◽  
Fernanda Saturnino Cardoso ◽  
Renato da Silva Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Discrete Variables ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Operating Surgeon ◽  
Type Of Surgery ◽  
Cleft Surgery

Objective: Surgeries performed in the afternoon schedule were discouraged by Smile Train Foundation for patients younger than 2 years. The aim of this study is to present the incidence of complications discriminating time of surgery (morning/afternoon) in a reference center in Curitiba (Brazil) during 2017. Design: Retrospective study that evaluated all cleft surgeries that were performed at Assistance Center for Cleft Lip and Palate during 2017. Complications correlated with surgery period (morning/afternoon), type of surgery, and operating surgeon were studied. Statistical analysis was performed to find any association between discrete variables. Setting: Tertiary, institutional Participants: One hundred eighty-seven patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate/cleft lip and palate, who were evaluated and submitted to surgery in the center and had less than 24 months of age, were included in the study. Interventions: One hundred twenty-four cheiloplasties and 63 palatoplasties were performed. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence of complications. Results: From the total of cheiloplasties, the number of complications was 2 (1.6%) and from the total of palatoplasties the number of complications was 11 (17%); 8.1% of surgeries that were performed in the morning had any complication compared to 5.1% of surgeries performed in the afternoon. Statistical analysis of discrete variables with χ2 test showed no correlation between surgery schedule and complications (χ2 = 0.62). Conclusion: The number of complications was not higher in the afternoon scheduled surgeries. Surgeon expertise had a statistically significant correlation with the absence of complications (χ2 = 20.57).

Prevalence of Cleft Lip/Palate in the Fangshan District of Beijing, 2006-2012

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1296-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfen Yang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Ruixin Ma ◽  
Lei Jin
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Upward Trend ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Obstetric Services ◽  
Permanent Residents ◽  
Beijing China

Objective: To estimate the cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) prevalence among births between 2006 and 2012 in Fangshan district of Beijing, China. Design: Surveillance data analysis. Setting: All hospitals that provide obstetric services in the district. Patients: The CL/P cases presented for this report were from 13 weeks’ gestation to 7 days postpartum. Main Outcome Measures: The CL/P prevalence was defined as the number of cases per 10 000 births, including live births and stillbirths at 28 weeks’ gestation or beyond. Results: The overall CL/P prevalence was 18.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.1-22.7) per 10 000 births. From 2006 to 2012, the CL/P prevalence was 19.3, 20.2, 10.9, 16.1, 17.5, 25.4, and 22.3 per 10 000 births; annually, no significant change was noted ( Pfor trend = .311). The prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip, and cleft lip and palate were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.0-5.4), 6.2 (95% CI: 4.2-8.8), and 9.4 (95% CI: 6.9-12.4) per 10 000 births, respectively. The CL/P prevalence among the nonpermanent residents (31.4 per 10 000 births) was 2.31 times that of permanent residents (13.6 per 10 000 births). Among nonpermanent residents, the CL/P prevalence showed an upward trend over the study period ( Pfor trend = .036), that increased from 38.8 (95% CI: 16.5-76.6) per 10 000 births in 2006 to 54.6 (95% CI: 25.7-100.4) per 10 000 births in 2012. Conclusions: The overall CL/P prevalence was stable in the Fangshan district. However, the CL/P prevalence of the nonpermanent residents increased significantly.

Congenital Heart Diseases Associated With Cleft Lip and Palate and Its Impact on Surgical Treatment Planning of Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate—A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562094308
Author(s):  
Gautam Rao ◽  
Anil Desai ◽  
Niranjan Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Congenital Heart Diseases ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Surgical Treatment Planning ◽  
Cleft Surgery

Objectives: The aim of this study is to know the prevalence, type of congenital heart diseases (CHDs), and its association with cleft lip and/or palate and to know the impact of CHDs on surgical treatment planning of cleft lip and palate from a craniofacial hospital specializing in orofacial clefts, head and neck cancer, and trauma management. Design: A total of 1381 patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate were included in the study. This is a hospital-based retro–prospective case record analysis. The data were collected from clinical records of the patients which included clinical, chest radiographic and 2D echocardiographic findings. Total incidence of CHDs and its impact on treatment planning was evaluated using κ statistics and χ2 test. Results: There were 32 (2.32%) cleft lip and palate patients with CHDs. In 2 patients, cleft surgery was delayed by 6 to 9 months to allow the defect to decrease in size. Subacute bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis was administered in 7 patients before cleft surgery. Cardiac surgery was advised prior to cleft surgery in 3 patients. Sixteen patients with CHDs were not taken for cleft surgery considering the potential risk to the patient’s life as they had multiple cardiac anomalies. There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications in these patients. Conclusion: The results emphasize the association between clefting and CHD. The collected data suggest that there should be careful examination of children with cleft lip and palate for signs of heart disease. This could significantly reduce the morbidity/mortality of cleft lip and palate surgery making it more predictable and safer.

Hard Palate Repair Timing and Facial Growth in Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Michael Mars
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective: To evaluate the effect of timing of hard palate repair on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate, with special reference to cranial base, maxilla, mandible, jaw relation, and incisor relation. Design: A systematic review. Methods: The search strategy was based on the key words “facial growth,” “cleft lip palate,” and “timing of (hard) palate repair.” Case reports, case-series, and studies with no control or comparison group in the sample were excluded. Results: Fifteen studies met the selection criteria. All the studies were retrospective and nonrandomized. Five studies used cephalometry and casts, seven used cephalometry, and three used casts. Methodological deficiencies and heterogeneity of the studies prevented major conclusions. Conclusion: The review highlights the importance of further research. Prospective well-designed, controlled studies, especially targeting long-term results, are required to elucidate the effect of timing of hard palate repair on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document