The Parental Craniofacial Morphological Features in Chinese Patients with Sporadic Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip with or without Palate

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da-wei Lu ◽  
Bing Shi ◽  
Huai-qing Chen ◽  
Yu Li ◽  
Tian Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
Base Angle ◽  
Craniofacial Features ◽  
Axis Length ◽  
Student’S T

Objective: To evaluate the parental craniofacial morphology in Chinese patients with sporadic nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without palate. Methods: A total of 98 parental pairs of nonsyndromic unilateral incomplete cleft lip children, 207 parental pairs of nonsyndromic complete cleft lip and palate children, and 206 normal persons from Sichuan University were involved in this study. A conventional cephalometric analysis was used to measure angles, linear distances, and their ratios. Two-sample Student's t tests and a multivariate discriminant analysis were applied to the data. Results: Data indicate that the unaffected parents of nonsyndromic cleft lip children had on average significantly more acute cranial base angle (Angle N-S-Ba) and larger nasal width (NC-NC′) (p < .01). The healthy parents of nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate children consistently displayed a more acute cranial base angle (Angle N-S-Ba), shorter palatal length (A- PNS) and maxillary length (PNS-ANS), a more obtuse gonial angle (Angle Me-Go-Ar), and a larger y-axis length (S-Gn) and nasal width (NC-NC′) (p < .01). Conclusions: All these results indicate that the healthy parents of patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without palate show distinct characteristics in craniofacial morphology. These parental craniofacial features are more obvious in patients with cleft lip with palate than those with cleft lip only. In general, the characteristics seem to be more distinct in the fathers than in the mothers of cleft patients.

Craniofacial Morphology in Twins with Cleft Lip and Palate

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuula Laatikainen ◽  
Reijo Ranta ◽  
Rolf Nordström
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
Maxilla And Mandible ◽  
Single Birth

The craniofacial morphology of 11 pairs of monozygotic (MZ) and 28 pairs of dizygotic (DZ) Finnish twins, discordant or concordant for cleft of the lip (CL), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), or cleft palate only (CP) were investigated by means of lateral cephalometric radiographs. The results were compared to those of age-, sex-, and cleft-type matched single-birth cleft subjects, and also with normative data from the Nordic population. The co-twins with no cleft lip or palate (NONC) showed only slightly more obtuse gonial and steeper mandibular angles compared to normative data. Twins with CL, UCLP or CP had a more retrusive mandible, a wider cranial base and mandibular angle, and a wider angle between the maxilla and mandible than did the single-birth cleft subjects. Comparison of the noncleft twin group with the CL, UCLP, and CP twin groups for the CL twins showed no significant differences. For the UCLP twins, a more retrusive and down- and backward rotation of both jaws, a wider gonial angle, and a wider cranial base angle was seen. The CP twins had their maxillae slightly retrusive, the down- and backward rotation of both jaws was apparent, and the gonial angle was more obtuse. A comparison between the noncleft MZ and noncleft CDZ twins showed no significant differences. The MZ CP twins had a more retrusive mandible and more down- and backward rotation of both jaws than did DZ CP twins. It thus can be suggested that twinning itself does not seem to have an effect on maxillofacial morphology, but the features of the mandibular structure, the cranial base angulation, and the inclination of the jaws are at least partly genetically induced.

Craniofacial Morphology in Adult Patients with Unoperated Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Gabriel Da Silva Filho ◽  
Rita De Cássia Moura Carvalho Lauris ◽  
Leopoldino Capelozza Filho ◽  
Gunvor Semb
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Striking Difference ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
Face Height ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
And Gender

Objective This report is a retrospective study that compares the craniofacial morphology of adult subjects with unoperated bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP) with that of a noncleft group. Methods The study was performed on standardized lateral cephalograms obtained at the Hospital for Research and Rehabilitation of Cleft Lip and Palate, University of São Paulo, Brazil. The research group consisted of 28 subjects (20 males, 8 females) with unoperated BCLP, ranging in age from 15 to 41 years. The control group was matched to the cleft group with regard to gender and age. The findings were analyzed on the basis of the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for cleft and gender. Results The most striking difference between the groups was the extremely prominent premaxilla in the cleft group that gave the BCLP face a very convex profile. The mandible exhibited a vertical growth pattern that resulted in a steep mandibular plane, an obtuse gonial angle and a long lower face height. The posterior face height was reduced. The cranial base dimensions were smaller, but there was no difference in cranial base angulation. Conclusions These findings confirm that in subjects with unoperated BCLP, the initial characteristics of the cleft malformation persist during growth.

Examination of Craniofacial Morphology in Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yildiz Öztürk ◽  
Nil Cura
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Turkish Children ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
Facial Height ◽  
Mandibular Plane

Craniofacial morphology of children with and without clefts has been reported to differ because of a combination of factors including, morphogenetic pattern, adaptive changes, and lip and palate management. The purpose of this study was to make a cephalometric evaluation of possible differences in craniofacial morphology of Turkish children with and without unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Twenty UCLP children (7 girls, 13 boys) with a mean age of 10.75 years (SD = 2.58 years) were compared with a control group of children without UCLP, who were matched for age (mean = 10.64 years, SD = 2.58 years) and sex. No patient had received orthodontic treatment. Linear and angular variables were measured from tracings of lateral cephalometric radiographs and the resulting data were evaluated statistically. Compared with children in the control group, the children in the cleft palate group demonstrated a greater flattening of the cranial base, a more retrognathic and posteriorly inclined maxilla with decreased length, a larger mandibular plane and gonial angle, larger anterior facial height, and decreased posterior and upper-posterior facial heights.

Longitudinal Study of Craniofacial Growth in Subjects with Cleft Lip and Palate: From Cheiloplasty to 8 Years of Age

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Ju Han ◽  
Akira Suzuki ◽  
Hideo Tashiro
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Growth Increment ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Craniofacial Growth ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
Growth Increments ◽  
Linear Dimensions ◽  
Isolated Cleft Palate

Craniofacial morphology was compared in 10 patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (UCLA), 33 with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and 14 patients with isolated cleft palate (CP). Serial lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms, obtained just before lip repair at 4 months or palatoplasty at 2 years, and at 4 and 8 years of age, were analyzed through comparisons with the means and growth increments of craniofacial dimensions. Facial forms at 8 years of age were compared with those of 33 noncleft subjects. Wider upper facial width before lip repair in the UCLP patients diminished slightly following surgery, but the condition persisted up to 8 years of age. Less forward growth of the maxilla was found in the subjects who received palatoplasty and a larger vertical growth increment in anterior maxilla occurred in the UCLP patients. Posterior maxillary height showed no significant differences in its growth increment among patients with clefts, but shorter posterior maxillary height in the UCLP patients continued. Linear dimensions of the mandible did not differ among cleft subjects, but a larger intercondylar width, a larger gonial angle, and a slightly retruded mandible in the CP patients and UCLP patients suggested compensation of the mandible to a wider and retroinclined nasomaxillary complex.

Cranial Base Angle in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110535
Author(s):  
Chandnee Murugan ◽  
Vignesh Kailasam
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Class I ◽  
Base Angle ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale ◽  
Ottawa Scale

Background: Diverse findings have been reported for the cranial base angle (CBA) in patients with CLP (cleft lip and palate) and non-CLP controls. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess and evaluate the CBA in patients with CLP and non-CLP controls. Methods: Data from PubMed, OVID Technologies, Inc., Cochrane, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) with relevant terms was extracted until December 31, 2020. Inclusion criteria were data of patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). In the case of UCLP and BCLP, patients with craniofacial syndromes were excluded. The study proposal was registered with PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42021228632). Results: Fifteen studies with a total of 2032 participants were included for the systematic review and 14 studies with a total of 1972 participants were included for the meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle Ottawa scale under seven domains by two authors. Thirteen studies were graded as “good” and two as “satisfactory.” The CBA in patients with CLP were greater than the non CLP Class I controls in six of the 15 studies. CBA was greater in patients with CLP than non-CLP controls by 1.21° (95% CI of 0.19-2.22). Meta-analysis reported considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 86%). Anterior (ACB) and posterior cranial base (PCB) lengths were shorter in patients with CLP than in the non-cleft Class I controls by 2.14 mm (95% CI of 0.99-3.30) and 2.06 mm (95% CI of 1.52-2.60), respectively. Conclusion: Most studies were graded as good. Patients with CLP had greater CBA and shorter ACB and PCB lengths when compared to non-CLP controls.

Predisposing Factors to Formation of Cleft Lip and Palate: Inherited Craniofacial Skeletal Morphology

2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Chatzistavrou ◽  
R. Bruce Ross ◽  
Bryan D. Tompson ◽  
Malcom C. Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Monozygotic Twins ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Length Ratio ◽  
Control Individual ◽  
Skeletal Morphology ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Student’S T

Objective To identify inherited craniofacial morphologic features in individuals at high risk for cleft of the lip, cleft palate, or both. Subjects Twins without cleft from 33 pairs of monozygotic twins discordant for cleft lip, cleft palate, or both were studied. There were 17 males and 16 females of Caucasian origin, ranging from 3 to 18 years (15 with cleft lip and palate [CLP], 10 with cleft lip [CL], and 8 with cleft palate [CP]), collected from five craniofacial centers (United States and Canada). Design The twin without cleft (noncleft) from each set was compared with an age- and sex-matched control individual from the Burlington Growth Centre, Toronto, Ontario. Posteroanterior and lateral cephalograms were traced and digitized using a computer custom analysis. Descriptive statistics, Student's t tests, and analysis of variance were used to test 40 variables in a pilot study comparing the noncleft twin groups with the controls. Preliminary analysis permitted pooling of the CLP and CL groups (n = 25). To minimize false-positive significance, only 14 variables (from the maxillofacial area) were tested. Results Using the raw probabilities, eight variables showed significant differences between the pooled noncleft CLP and CL (CL[P]) twin group and the controls. However, when the level of significance was adjusted, only four (nasal width [p < .01], cranial base length [p < .05], cranial base width/length ratio [p < .001], and maxillary width/length ratio [p < .05]) were significantly different. No significant differences were confirmed between the noncleft CP twin group and the controls. Conclusions The noncleft member of a discordant monozygotic pair has a number of facial characteristics that differ from the general population. These may predispose to the formation of a cleft lip or palate and may result from a deficiency or distortion of the mesenchyme that forms the craniofacial structures.

Craniofacial Morphology of Adult Unoperated Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopoldino Capelozza ◽  
Sheyla Miki Taniguchi ◽  
Omar Gabriel Da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Normal Group ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Plane Angle ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
Facial Height ◽  
Mandibular Plane ◽  
Mandibular Plane Angle

The craniofacial morphology of 26 white unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients (13 males, 13 females) was analyzed with cephalometry and compared with a control (normal) group. The results show that in the cleft group, the maxilla is smaller and more protruded, the lower anterior facial height is much larger, and the mandible shows well-defined differences (body, ramus, gonial angle, and mandibular plane angle).

Craniofacial Comparisons in 22-Month-Old Lip-Operated Children with Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate and Unilateral Incomplete Cleft Lip

2000 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.V. Hermann ◽  
B.L. Jensen ◽  
E. Dahl ◽  
S. Bolund ◽  
S. Kreiborg
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Facial Morphology ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
Student’S T Test

Objective The objective of the study was to analyze the craniofacial morphology in infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCCLP) in which the lip and the anterior part of the palate had been surgically closed at 2 months of age and to compare the morphology with that of a control group with unilateral incomplete cleft lip (UICL) in which the lip had also been surgically closed at 2 months of age. Design The sample consisted of a total of 108 cleft children all fulfilling the entry criteria, besides diagnosis, as follows: The child was of Danish origin; the age of the child was between 650 and 750 days (approximately 22 months) at the time of examination; the child was healthy except for its single cleft malformation; the surgical procedure in each group had been performed at about 2 months of age by the same surgeon. The surgical methods used were a Tennison procedure (UICL group) and a Tennison procedure supplemented by palatovomer plasty (UCCLP group). Methods The method of investigation was infant cephalometry in the lateral, frontal, and axial projections. Linear, angular, and area variables describing the craniofacial morphology were calculated and supplemented by mean plots from the cephalometric projections in the two groups. Results and Conclusions Statistical analysis based on Student's t test showed that the facial morphology in the 22-month-old UCCLP group differed significantly from that of the UICL group. The most pronounced differences were found in the maxillary complex and the mandible. The deviations observed in the UCCLP group at 22 months of age were similar to those previously observed at 2 months of age. However, several of the dysmorphic traits had become less pronounced; some had remained the same; and a few had become worse with time.

Influence of Lip Repair on Craniofacial Morphology of Patients with Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho ◽  
José Valladares Neto ◽  
Leopoldino Capelloza Filho ◽  
JoséAlberto de Souza Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Adult Male ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Spatial Positioning ◽  
Craniofacial Complex

Objective The aim of this study was to compare two groups of adult male patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) on the basis of lateral cephalometric radiographs. Patients The first group of adult male patients with complete BCLP was comprised of 13 unoperated patients with an average age of 21 years. The second group was comprised of 14 patients with an average age of 21 years 7 months, who had been operated only on the lip prior to 2 years of age. Design The following measurements were evaluated: angle and length of cranial base; maxillary spatial positioning and length; mandibular spatial positioning; morphology and length; maxillomandibular relationship; vertical facial length; dental positioning; interdental arch relationship; and soft profile. Results The results suggest that lip repair has a significant influence on certain areas of the craniofacial complex, mainly the premaxilla and the upper incisors. Conclusions The most significant findings consequent to lip repair consisted of reduction of the premaxillary anterior projection and lingual tipping of the upper incisors. Retropositioning of the premaxilla, especially in the alveolar part, is a desired effect of lip repair in complete BCLP. Such effect on the projected premaxilla is usually beneficial, except when the exceedingly severe lip pressure, unfavorable growth pattern, or both retropositions the midface profile beyond acceptable sagittal limits.

Mandibular Morphology and Spatial Position following One-Stage Simultaneous Repair of Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Fudalej ◽  
Barbara Obloj ◽  
Zofia Dudkiewicz ◽  
Maria Hortis-Dzierzbicka
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Spatial Position ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gonial Angle ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Irregularity Index ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Mandibular Body

Objective: To assess mandibular structure and spatial position following one-stage simultaneous repair of the unilateral cleft lip and palate. Design: Forty boys and 17 girls with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent one-stage simultaneous repair of the cleft by the same surgeon at the age of 9.23 months (standard deviation  =  1.74) were selected. Lateral cephalograms taken at the age of approximately 10 years were analyzed and were compared with a sex- and age-matched control group that consisted of individuals with Angle Class I, no crossbite, positive overbite <5 mm, mild crowding (Incisor Irregularity Index <3.5 mm), and harmonious facial build. Results: No intergroup differences were demonstrated regarding structure of the cranial base. The mandible was found to be retruded and at a larger inclination to the cranial base as compared with controls. Both total mandibular length (ArGn) and length of the mandibular body were larger in the control group, at <2 mm. Height of the ramus and gonial angle were similar in both groups. Intergender comparison showed few significant differences in control subjects only (SN, SGo, and NMe variables). Conclusions: The mandible, following a one-stage simultaneous repair of cleft, was found to be retrusive, and the length of mandibular body was <2 mm shorter than that of the controls.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document