A New Protocol for Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Patients: Repetitive Weekly Protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jein-Wein Liou ◽  
Wen-Ching Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Maxillary Advancement

Objective It was hypothesized that, through a repetitive weekly protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions (Alt-RAMEC), the maxilla in cleft patients could be protracted more effectively than with a single course of rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Methods Twenty-six consecutive unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at the age of mixed dentition were included in this prospective clinical study. The rapid maxillary expansion group included the first 16 consecutive patients undergoing 1 week of rapid maxillary expansion (1 mm/day) followed by 5 months, 3 weeks of maxillary protraction. The Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group included the next 10 consecutive patients undergoing 9 weeks of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions followed by 3 months, 3 weeks of maxillary protraction. Daily activation of the weekly expansion or constriction was 1.0 mm. Two-hinged expanders and intraoral maxillary protraction springs were used in both groups. Treatment results were evaluated cephalometrically. Results The amount of maxillary anterior displacement by the 2-hinged expander in the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group was 3.0 ± 0.9 mm at A point, significantly greater than the 1.6 ± 1.0 mm in the rapid maxillary expansion group. The amount of maxillary advancement with intraoral protraction springs in the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group was 2.9 ± 1.9 mm at A point, significantly greater than the 0.9 ± 1.1 mm in the rapid maxillary expansion group. The overall amount of maxillary advancement in the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group was 5.8 ± 2.3 mm at A point. This result remained stable, without significant relapse after 2 years. Conclusions Maxillary protraction using the 2-hinged expander, a repetitive weekly protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions, and intraoral protraction springs is most effective, with stable results at 2-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Immediate and late follow-up effects of class III early correction in cleft lip and palate patients treated with maxillary protraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Mazon MIRANDA ◽  
Rodrigo Matos de SOUZA ◽  
Giovana Cherubini VENEZIAN ◽  
Cristina FRANZINI ◽  
William CUSTODIO
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
The Stability

Abstract Introduction There is no consensus about the immediate and latte follow-up effects of maxillary protraction in cleft lip and palate patients. Objective To evaluate the stability of Class III early treatment in cleft lip and palate patients through maxillary expansion and protraction. Material and method The sample consists in three lateral cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients (mean pre-treatment age of 6.7±1.8 years) who presented cleft lip and palate and were treated with maxillary expansion and Petit facial mask. The angular (SNA, SNB, ANB, SN.GoGn, FMA, Z Angle) and linear (overjet, Co-A, Co-Gn, Nperp-A, Nperp-Pg, AO-BO) cephalometric measures were evaluated through the Dolphin® software, in three moments: T0 (initial), T1 (after treatment), and T2 (follow-up). Data were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer test. The correlation between cephalometric measures and patient’s age was determined by Pearson’s chi-squared test. Result The SNA, ANB, and AO-BO measures increased considerably (p<0.05), and they did not present any differences compared to the initial ones after the follow-up time. The overjet measure increased (p<0.05) after treatment and, even with its decrease at the follow-up time, it was still higher than at the beginning (p<0.05). The Z angle showed improvement with treatment and remained stable at the follow-up time. Conclusion After treatment (maxillary expansion associated with protraction), there was a skeletal pattern improvement. During the follow-up period, those alterations decreased to a measure close to the beginning. There was an improvement in the dental pattern and facial profile that continued in the follow-up period.

Dentoskeletal Effects of Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Patients with Repetitive Weekly Protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavoda Luz Vieira ◽  
Luciane Macedo de Menezes ◽  
Eduardo Martinelli S. de Lima ◽  
Susana Rizzatto
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Covariance Structure ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2

Objective: To evaluate the amount of maxillary protraction with face mask in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients submitted to two distinct rapid maxillary expansion (RME) protocols. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 20 individuals (nine boys and 11 girls; mean age of 10.4 ± 2.62 years) with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who had a constricted maxilla in the vertical and transverse dimensions. Ten patients underwent 1 week of RME with screw activation of one complete turn per day, followed by 23 weeks of maxillary protraction (group 1). The other 10 patients underwent 7 weeks of alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction, with one complete turn per day, followed by 17 weeks of maxillary protraction (group 2); both groups underwent a total of 6 months of treatment. Cephalometric measurements were taken at different times: pretreatment (T1), soon after RME (T2), and after 6 months of treatment (T3). Each measurement was analyzed with mixed models for repeated measures, and the covariance structure chosen was compound symmetry. Results: The maxilla displaced slightly forward and downward with a counterclockwise rotation; the mandible rotated downward and backward, resulting in an increase in anterior facial height; the sagittal maxillomandibular relationship was improved; the maxillary molars and incisors were protruded and extruded; and the mandibular incisors were retroclined. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the groups in evaluation time.

Efficacy of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Associated With Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 872-876
Author(s):  
Okada Terumi Ozawa ◽  
Costa Daniela Salzedas ◽  
de Lima Beatriz Oliveira ◽  
Renata Sathler ◽  
Gleisieli Baessa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
The Stability ◽  
In The Beginning ◽  
Dental Casts

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and maxillary protraction (MP) in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP) using the Goslon yardstick index. Design: Retrospective study. Patients: Dental casts of 34 Goslon 3 (G3) and Goslon 4 (G4) patients treated with RME and MP were evaluated which composed the treated sample (S1). The dental cast were taken before the RME (T1) and immediately after the use of face mask for MP was suspended (T2). In order to verify the stability of the treatment, dental casts of 17 of these patients were evaluated 1 year after the treatment was finished (T3). For the control sample (S2), dental casts of 20 untreated G3 and G4 patients were evaluated. Results: At T2, 85.7% of study sample patients initially G3 and 70% of patients initially G4 obtained improvement in occlusal index. At T3, the majority of patients initially classified as G3 and G4 returned to the same classification as in the beginning of the treatment. The evaluation of the control sample showed that patients initially classified as G3, 55.6% continued at this initial index, and 44.4% had it worsened. Those initially G4, 100%, continued at this initial index. Conclusion: The immediate result of RME and MP was satisfactory, and despite the instability of these results, the outcome of this treatment option was better than the untreated sample.

Treatment of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient With Intraoral Tooth Tissue Borne Distractor and Facemask Therapy: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562199336
Author(s):  
Akansha Bansal Agrawal ◽  
Harshavardhan Kidiyoor ◽  
Anand K. Patil Morth
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Tooth Tissue

This case report demonstrates the successful use of intraoral distractor/hygenic rapid expander (HYRAX) for rapid maxillary expansion in anteroposterior direction with an adjunctive use of face mask therapy for anterior orthopedic traction of maxillary complex in a cleft patient with concave profile. The patient was a 13-year-old girl who reported with a chief complaint of backwardly positioned upper jaw and a severely forward positioned lower jaw. Therefore, a treatment was chosen in which acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion was done with tooth tissue borne intraoral distractor/HYRAX having a different activation schedule along with Dr Henri Petit facemask to treat maxillary retrognathism. As a result, crossbite got corrected and attained a positive jet with no bone loss in cleft area over a period of 5 months which was followed by fixed mechanotherapy achieving a well settled occlusion in 1 year. After completion of expansion and fixed mechanotherapy, ANB became +1 post-treatment which was −4 pretreatment. The prognathic profile was markedly improved by expansion and taking advantage of the remaining growth potential, thus minimizing the chances of surgery later in life. This provided a viable alternative to orthognathic surgery with good long-term stability.

scholarly journals Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 82-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Santos Fonseca Figueiredo ◽  
Lucas Cardinal ◽  
Flávia Uchôa Costa Bartolomeo ◽  
Juan Martin Palomo ◽  
Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Tomographic Image ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Downward Movement ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maxillary Region

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one.

Skeletal Response to Maxillary Protraction in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate before Age 10 Years

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf S. Tindlund
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Forward Movement ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Face Height ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Maxillary Dentition

Over the last 15 years, cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients with maxillary deficiency in the care of the Bergen CLP Team have received interceptive orthopedic treatment to correct anterior and posterior crossbites during the deciduous and mixed dentition periods. The present study comprises 72 subjects of various cleft types with anterior crossbite, treated to an acceptable positive overjet by maxillary protraction using a facial mask (Delaire). Lateral cephalograms were taken immediately before and after the active treatment periods. Individuals exhibiting a favorable (fair) skeletal response to the protraction were compared with those who revealed little, (poor) skeletal response. Two cephalometric variables were chosen for the evaluation of the sagittal skeletal treatment changes: (1) the sagittal maxillomandibular change (change of angle ss-n-sm [ANB]); and (2) the forward movement of the maxilla (change of distance NSP-maxp), where maxp (maxillary point) represents the anterior contour of maxilla and NSP is the perpendicular to the naslon-sella-line (NSL) through sella. A numerical change greater than or equal to the value 1.5 (degrees or mm, respectively) was classified as fair versus poor response revealing a change less than 1.5. Fair-response (favorable response) of sagittal maxillomandibular change was found in 63 % of the cases (mean increase of angle ANB was 3.3 degrees), more often when protraction started early. The length of maxilla was increased, the skeletal maxilla was moved forward 1.8 mm, the upper dentition advanced 3.6 mm, the occlusal line was clockwise rotated, and the anterior face height was increased. Similarly, fair-response of forward movement of maxilla was found in 44% of the cases (mean increase of distance NSP-maxp was 2.4 mm), more often when protraction was started early and after long treatment duration. The maxillary prognathism increased 1.8 degrees, the angle ANB increased 3 degrees, the length of maxilla increased 1.5 mm, and the upper dentition was advanced 3.7 mm. The anterior face height increased with counterclockwise rotation of the nasal line, whereas the occlusal line was clockwise rotated. A paired fair-response of both skeletal maxillomandibular change and skeletal forward movement of maxilla was found in 35% of the cases. During protraction the mean increase of maxillary prognathism was 2.1 degrees, the maxilla moved forward 3.1 mm, the maxillary dentition advanced 4.3 mm, the maxillary length increased 1.9 mm, the ANB angle increased 3.7 degrees, and the lower anterior facial height increased 3.4 mm.

Does Early Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting Influence Need for Additional Maxillary Advancement Procedures in Cleft Lip and Palate?

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110427
Author(s):  
Kathlyn K. Powell ◽  
Paul Lewis ◽  
Rae Sesanto ◽  
Peter D. Waite
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treated Patient ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Maxillary Advancement ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective To determine if secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) timing in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) influences the future need for additional maxillary advancement procedures, particularly Le Fort I osteotomy with rigid external distraction (RED). Design Retrospective cohort study. Groups were separated by SABG timing: early mixed dentition (ages 68 years) or late mixed dentition (ages 9-11 years). The criterion for RED was negative overjet ≥8 mm, and sufficient dental development for RED. Setting Single tertiary care institution. Patients Patients with CLP that underwent SABG from 2010 to 2015. Exclusion criteria included syndromic conditions, SABG surgery at age >12 years, current age <12 years, and <2 years follow-up. 104 patients were included. Main outcome measures The number of RED candidates and treated patients. Results There was no statistical difference in the number of RED candidates ( P  =  .0718) nor treated patients ( P  =  .2716) based on SABG timing; stratification by laterality was also insignificant. Early SABG is associated with higher odds of being a RED candidate (pooled, unilateral, bilateral) and treated patient (pooled and unilateral); however, there were no statistically significant associations between SABG timing and the number of RED candidates and treated patients as determined by logistic regression models. Conclusion There is no statistically significant association between SABG timing and the odds of being a RED candidate or treated patient. Future prospective studies are recommended to assess the relationship between SABG timing and maxillary growth in patients with CLP.

The Impacts and Outcomes of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding (PNAM) in Newborn Sequential Therapeutic Implementation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vonda Trivosa
Keyword(s):  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Deciduous Dentition ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding

Cleft lip and palate is a common congenital malformation in the oral and maxillofacial regions. According to epidemiological investigation, the incidence rate is about 1.625%, and the incidence rate is high in poor areas and rural areas. Cleft lip and palate mainly involve the upper lip, hard palate, soft palate and nose, which can damage the appearance of children, affect pronunciation, swallowing and chewing, and also bring different degrees of psychological damage to children in the growth stage. Therefore, we should actively carry out sequential treatment and participate in the treatment work through multi-disciplines. Based on restoring the oral and maxillofacial function and health of children, we should also pay attention to their aesthetic needs, enhance the treatment confidence of parents and children, and lay the foundation for the follow-up repair treatment. Most patients with cleft lip and palate are complicated with malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment is an important part of the treatment of cleft lip and palate. The orthodontic treatment of cleft lip and palate can be divided into five periods: newborn period, deciduous dentition period, mixed dentition period, permanent dentition period and combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment period. Presurgicalnasoalveolar molding (PNAM) was used to reduce the severity of facial deformity in children with cleft lip and palate. This article discusses the therapeutic effect of newborn PNAM according to clinical cases. Objective to study the opportunity and current situation of PNAM in the treatment of children with cleft lip and palate, and to provide a favorable reference for clinical orthodontists, emphasizing the close communication between various disciplines.

scholarly journals Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate:

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eman H. Elabbassy ◽  
Noha E. Sabet ◽  
Islam T. Hassan ◽  
Dina H. Elghoul ◽  
Marwa A. Elkassaby
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Forward Movement ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Group I ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the effectiveness of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and whether it was enhanced when preceded by maxillary expansion. Materials and Methods The sample consisted of 28 growing children (9–13 years old) with UCLP and Class III malocclusion. They were divided into two equal groups. In group I, patients were treated with BAMP not preceded by maxillary expansion. In group II, patients were treated with BAMP preceded by maxillary expansion. To assess treatment changes in three dimensions, Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken 1 week after surgical placement of the miniplates (T1) and after 9 months of treatment (T2). Results BAMP produced forward movement of the maxilla in both groups (3.17 mm) and (3.37 mm) respectively, without significant differences between the two groups except for clockwise rotation of the palatal plane in group I (1.60). Conclusions BAMP is an effective treatment modality for correcting midface deficiency in patients with UCLP whether or not maxillary expansion was carried out.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document