Understanding the Labor Market Decisions and Outcomes of Nepal's Young Adults

10.1596/30629 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Author(s):  
Rachel Widra ◽  
André Victor D. Luduvice

In this Economic Commentary, we use the Current Population Survey to identify and examine the influx of young adults who moved in with their parents during the COVID-19 pandemic—the so-called boomerang kids—and how being in their family home influences their labor market decisions and sensitivity to occupational risk relative to that of other young adults. We find that most boomerang kids come from high-income families that can financially support them through nonemployment spells that are, on average, longer than those of young adults not living with their parents. Young adults living with their parents are also more responsive to the risk of COVID-19 exposure in the workplace and are less likely to work in occupations with high exposure risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. S199-S241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna E. Johnson ◽  
Sam Schulhofer-Wohl

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1080-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Patler

Recent research theorizes a widening sociopolitical gap between undocumented and documented immigrants — but also between citizens and noncitizens generally — with implications for mobility. How might legal inequality influence educational outcomes? Largely due to data constraints, much existing research is unable to distinguish between legal statuses. Yet, legal status may help explain inconsistent findings of “immigrant advantage” among Latinos. Using survey data from Latino young adults in California, I explore how legal status impacts high school completion, post‐secondary enrollment, and labor market expectations. I find evidence of undocumented disadvantage and citizenship advantage in completion and enrollment, but no differences in expectations. Findings suggest that scholars should pay closer attention to the role of legal background in shaping mobility.


Challenge ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 60-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Sum ◽  
Ishwar Khatiwada ◽  
Walter McHugh ◽  
Will Kent
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-904
Author(s):  
Sayeh Nikpay ◽  
India Pungarcher ◽  
Austin Frakt

Abstract The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted in 2010 to address both high uninsured rates and rising health care spending through insurance expansion reforms and efforts to reduce waste. It was expected to have a variety of impacts in areas within the purview of economics, including effects on health care coverage, access to care, financial security, labor market decisions, health, and health care spending. To varying degrees, legislative, executive, and judicial actions have altered its implementation, affecting the extent to which expectations in each of these dimensions have been realized. We review the ACA's reforms, the subsequent actions that countered them, and the expected and realized effects on coverage, access to care, financial security, health, labor market decisions, and health care spending.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document