scholarly journals Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Functional Independence Measure Gain in Post-acute Rehabilitation Ward Patients with Motor Disorders

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-240
Author(s):  
Takuma NAKAGUCHI ◽  
Taisei ISHIMOTO ◽  
Naoki AKAZAWA
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Functional Independence Measure ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Motor Disorders ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Rehabilitation Ward ◽  
Acute Rehabilitation

Less-Affected Hand Function Is Associated With Independence in Daily Living: A Longitudinal Study Poststroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samar Hmaied Assadi ◽  
Haim Barel ◽  
Israel Dudkiewicz ◽  
Revital Feige Gross-Nevo ◽  
Debbie Rand
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Brain Lesion ◽  
Functional Independence Measure ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Stroke Type ◽  
Block Test

Background and Purpose: The upper extremity (UE) ipsilateral to the brain lesion is mildly affected poststroke. It is unclear whether patients perceive this, and the association between less-affected hand function and independence in activities of daily living (ADL) is unknown. We aimed to (1) assess longitudinal changes in function, dexterity, grip strength, and self-perception of the less-affected UE, (2) compare them to the normative data, and (3) determine the association of both UEs to ADL during the first 6 months poststroke. Methods: Consecutive adults following a first stroke were assessed on rehabilitation admission (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3) poststroke onset. Box and block test assessed function of both UEs. The functional dexterity test (FDT) and Jamar Dynamometer assessed dexterity and grip strength of the less-affected UE. The functional independence measure assessed ADL, and instrumental ADL was assessed at T3. Spearman correlations and multiple regression models were used. Results: Participants were assessed at T1 (N=87), T2 (N=82), and T3 (N=68). At T1, less-affected UE deficits were apparent (median [interquartile range] box and block test-45 [35–53] blocks, FDT-44.5 [33.3–60.8] seconds, grip-25.5 [16.2–33.9] kilograms), but only 19.5% of the participants self-perceived this. Less-affected hand function significantly improved with 32% and 33% achieving a minimal clinically important difference for box and block test at T2 and T3, respectively. Dexterity improved significantly between T1 and T2 ( P <0.001, no established minimal clinically important difference) and grip strength improved significantly between T2 and T3; 3.4% achieving a minimal clinically important difference ( P <0.01). At T3, most participants did not reach the norms (box and block test-67.4 blocks, FDT-32.2 seconds, grip-40.5 kilograms). Both the less- and more-affected UEs explained a large portion of the variance of ADL at all time-points, after controlling for age, days-since-stroke-onset, stroke type, and cognition. Conclusions: Despite some improvement, the less-affected UE at 6 months poststroke remained below norms, explaining difficulties in ADL and instrumental ADL. Further research is needed.

Detecting change in community participation with the Enfranchisement scale of the community participation indicators

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110521
Author(s):  
Jessica Kersey ◽  
Lauren Terhorst ◽  
Joy Hammel ◽  
Carolyn Baum ◽  
Joan Toglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Participation ◽  
Functional Independence Measure ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Baseline Score ◽  
Sensitivity To Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Change Scores ◽  
Minimum Detectable Change ◽  
Clinically Important Difference

Objective This study determined the sensitivity to change of the Enfranchisement scale of the Community Participation Indicators in people with stroke. Data sources We analyzed data from two studies of participants with stroke: an intervention study and an observational study. Main measures The Enfranchisement Scale contains two subscales: the Importance subscale (feeling valued by and contributing to the community; range: 14–70) and the Control subscale (choice and control: range: 13–64). Data analysis Assessments were administered 6 months apart. We calculated minimum detectable change and minimal clinically important difference. Results The Control subscale analysis included 121 participants with a mean age of 61.2 and mild-moderate disability (Functional Independence Measure, mean = 97.9, SD = 24.7). On the Control subscale, participants had a mean baseline score of 51.4 (SD = 10.4), and little mean change (1.3) but with large variation in change scores (SD = 11.5). We found a minimum detectable change of 9 and a minimum clinically important difference of 6. The Importance subscale analysis included 116 participants with a mean age of 60.7 and mild-moderate disability (Functional Independence Measure, mean = 98.9, SD = 24.5). On the Importance subscale, participants had a mean baseline score of 44.1 (SD = 12.7), and again demonstrated little mean change (1.08) but with large variation in change scores (SD = 12.6). We found a minimum detectable change of 11 and a minimum clinically important difference 7. Conclusions The Control subscale required 9 points of change, and the Importance subscale required 11 points of change, to achieve statistically and clinically meaningful changes, suggesting adequate sensitivity to change.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document