Laser lipolysis versus traditional liposuction for fat removal

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge Mordon ◽  
Eric Plot
Keyword(s):  
Laser Lipolysis ◽  
Fat Removal

Laser Lipolysis Beats Liposuction in Two Studies

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
SHARON WORCESTER
Keyword(s):  
Laser Lipolysis

Laser Lipolysis: The Future of Liposuction

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
ROBERT A. WEISS
Keyword(s):  
Laser Lipolysis ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals A new approach for fat removal in a discontinuous autotransfusion device-concept and evaluation

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Seyfried ◽  
M. Gruber ◽  
M. T. Pawlik ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
R. J. Mandle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Approach ◽  
Fat Removal

scholarly journals Effect of Fat on Protein Estimation in Milk and Its Correlation with Lactose in Different Milk Types: A Small-Scale Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sweekruthi A. Shetty ◽  
Melissa F. Young ◽  
Sunita Taneja ◽  
Kannan Rangiah
Keyword(s):  
Sample Preparation ◽  
Human Milk ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
Cow Milk ◽  
Selected Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Protein Estimation ◽  
Animal Milk ◽  
Fat Removal

Background: Estimation of macronutrients like protein and lactose is important to assess the quality of milk. To estimate these two macronutrients, ten raw milk samples obtained from each group of different animals (cow, goat, buffalo), ten pasteurized cow milk and ten human milk samples were analysed. Methods: Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method was used to estimate protein from different milk samples. Four different sample preparation protocols were compared to check the effect of fat on BCA based protein estimation: dilution (D), fat removal-protein precipitation (FR and PP), fat removal-dilution (FR and D) and dilution-fat removal (D and FR). For lactose quantification, ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-selected reaction monitoring (UHPLC-MS/SRM) method was developed and validated using 13C6 lactose as internal standard (ISTD).Result: Among these four different protocols, D and FR method showed consistent data for total protein content in animal milk (cow-3.16%, goat-3.21%, buffalo-3.81%, pasteurized-2.98%) and FR and PP showed consistent data in human milk samples (1.2%). Though BCA method is simple to use, proper sample preparation protocol has to be applied prior to protein estimation to avoid the interference due to fat or lactose. In case of lactose, inter-day validation showed the accuracy ranging from 97.13 to 100.54%, coefficient of variation varying between 0.1 to 1.53%, correlation R2=0.999. Lactose is in the range of 4.1 to 4.8% in animal milk and 6.6% in human milk samples. The internal ratio of lactose/protein (1.28 to 1.55 in animal milk and 5.33 in human milk) will be useful to differentiate human milk from animal milk type and to assess the milk quality.

Laser Lipolysis

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Paula Amendola Bellotti Schwartz de Azevedo ◽  
Bianca Bretas de Macedo Silva ◽  
Leticia Almeida Silva
Keyword(s):  
Laser Lipolysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document