Management of the small renal mass: what is the most reasonable option?

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 979-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Ghavamian
Keyword(s):  
Renal Mass ◽  
Small Renal Mass

Changing Practice In The Management Of Small Renal Mass

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Md Jahangir Kabir
Keyword(s):  
Renal Mass ◽  
Small Renal Mass ◽  
Changing Practice

Abstract Not Available Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan 2013 p.1-4

Laparoscopic Versus Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Mass: Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-519.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo R. Pessoa ◽  
Riccardo Autorino ◽  
M. Pilar Laguna ◽  
Wilson R. Molina ◽  
Diedra Gustafson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Renal Mass ◽  
Small Renal Mass ◽  
Percutaneous Cryoablation

PERC-score: a nephrometry score for percutaneous tumor ablation of small renal mass

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S818-S819
Author(s):  
L. Bianchi ◽  
P. Piazza ◽  
F. Chessa ◽  
A. Mottaran ◽  
C. Casablanca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Mass ◽  
Tumor Ablation ◽  
Small Renal Mass ◽  
Nephrometry Score

Implications on clinical management of the small renal mass in patients 80 years of age and older based on a retrospective review of the SEER database

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 1503-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas H. Russell ◽  
Mitchell S. Wachtel ◽  
Heiko W. de Riese ◽  
Allan L. Haynes ◽  
Werner T. W. de Riese
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Renal Mass ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Small Renal Mass

scholarly journals MP19-13 COMPARING UROLOGIST RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SMALL RENAL MASS BIOPSY WITH PATIENT OPINIONS BEFORE AND AFTER COUNSELING

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq A. Khemees* ◽  
Anthony Bui ◽  
Daniel D. Shapiro ◽  
Sara L. Best ◽  
Shane A. Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Mass ◽  
Small Renal Mass ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Renal Mass Biopsy

Small Renal Mass

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. xv
Author(s):  
Samir S. Taneja
Keyword(s):  
Renal Mass ◽  
Small Renal Mass

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cryoablation for the Small Renal Mass

2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 899-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Guillotreau ◽  
Georges-Pascal Haber ◽  
Riccardo Autorino ◽  
Ranko Miocinovic ◽  
Shahab Hillyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Mass ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Small Renal Mass

scholarly journals The role of intraoperative ultrasound in small renal mass robotic enucleation

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Gunelli ◽  
Massimo Fiori ◽  
Cristiano Salaris ◽  
Umberto Salomone ◽  
Marco Urbinati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Mass ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasound ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Small Renal Mass ◽  
Ultrasound Probe ◽  
3D Vision ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Minimal Invasiveness ◽  
Robotic Ultrasound

Introduction: As a result of the growing evidence on tumor radical resection in literature, simple enucleation has become one of the best techniques associated to robotic surgery in the treatment of renal neoplasia, as it guarantees minimal invasiveness and the maximum sparing of renal tissue, facilitating the use of reduced or zero ischemia techniques during resection. The use of a robotic ultrasound probe represents a useful tool to detect and define tumor location, especially in poorly exophytic small renal mass. Materials and methods: A total of 22 robotic enucleations were performed on < 3 cm renal neoplasias (PADUA score 18 Pz 6/7 e 4 Pz 8) using a 12-5 MHz robotic ultrasound probe (BK Drop-In 8826). Results: Once kidney had been isolated from the adipose capsule at the site of the neoplasia (2), the exact position of the lesion could be easily identified in all cases (22/22), even for mostly endophytic lesions, thanks to the insertion of the ultrasound probe through the assistant port. Images were produced and visualized by the surgeon using the TilePro feature of the DaVinci surgical system for producing a picture-in-picture image on the console screen. The margins of resection were then marked with cautery, thus allowing for speedy anatomical dissection. This reduced the time of ischemia to 8 min (6-13) and facilitated the enucleation technique when performed without clamping the renal peduncle (6/22). No complications due to the use of the ultrasound probe were observed. Conclusions: The use of an intraoperative robotic ultrasound probe has allowed for easier identification of small, mostly endophytic neoplasias, better anatomical approach, shorter ischemic time, reduced risk of pseudocapsule rupture during dissection, and easier enucleation in cases performed without clamping. It is noteworthy that the use of intraoperative ultrasound probe allows mental reconstruction of the tumor through an accurate 3D vision of the hidden field during surgical dissection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document