Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemic patients with cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 697-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semira Sheikh ◽  
Tim J Littlewood
2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Weir ◽  
Tara Gomes ◽  
Eric Winquist ◽  
David N. Juurlink ◽  
Meaghan S. Cuerden ◽  
...  

Formulary access and safety warnings had significant impacts on the new use of ESAs in patients with cancer, suggesting that both are effective means of influencing the use of these drugs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e562-e573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Noxon ◽  
Kevin B. Knopf ◽  
LeAnn B. Norris ◽  
Brian Chen ◽  
Y. Tony Yang ◽  
...  

Purpose: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved epoetin and darbepoetin for chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Approved epoetin and darbepoetin dosing schedules were three times per week and weekly, respectively, although off-label, less frequent scheduling was common. In 2004, 2007, and 2008, a US Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committees warned of risks associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. During this period, lawsuits alleging illegal darbepoetin marketing practices have concluded, resulting in $1.1 billion in fines and settlements and one criminal conviction. No prior study, to our knowledge, has reported on the use of darbepoetin versus epoetin for CIA. Methods: We evaluated the dosing, utilization, and costs of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among 3,761 South Carolina Medicaid patients with CIA. Results: Epoetin and darbepoetin utilization rates were 22% and 28% in 2003, 10% and 33% in 2007, and 3% and 7% in 2010, respectively. Mean per-patient per-administration epoetin and darbepoetin doses were 40,983 IU and 191 µg, respectively, in 2003 and 47,753 IU and 369 µg, respectively, in 2010. Mean monthly patient costs for epoetin and darbepoetin were $1,030 and $981, respectively, in 2003 and $932 and $1,352, respectively, in 2010. Epoetin use decreased steadily between 2002 and 2010; darbepoetin use increased steadily between 2003 and 2007 and then decreased steadily thereafter. Per-patient dosing of darbepoetin, but not epoetin, increased steadily between 2003 and 2010, and monthly per-patient epoetin costs decreased 3% while the per-patients costs of darbepoetin increased 30% between 2003 and 2010. Conclusion: To our knowledge, our findings are the first data reporting on epoetin versus darbepoetin use for CIA and support recently concluded lawsuits involving allegations of illegal marketing practices of the manufacturer of darbepoetin.


2014 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azzour D. Hazzan ◽  
Hitesh H. Shah ◽  
Susana Hong ◽  
Vipulbhai Sakhiya ◽  
Rimda Wanchoo ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Bennett ◽  
Pamela S. Becker ◽  
Eric H. Kraut ◽  
Athena T. Samaras ◽  
Dennis P. West

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1775-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Daniel ◽  
Dana Hurley ◽  
Joanna L. Whyte ◽  
Vincent Willey ◽  
Marcus Wilson ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 373 (9674) ◽  
pp. 1532-1542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Bohlius ◽  
Kurt Schmidlin ◽  
Corinne Brillant ◽  
Guido Schwarzer ◽  
Sven Trelle ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3242-3247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinni Juneja ◽  
Patricia Keegan ◽  
Joseph E. Gootenberg ◽  
Mark D. Rothmann ◽  
Yuan Li Shen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document