Cardiac resynchronization therapy: redefining the role of device therapy in heart failure

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-469
Author(s):  
Karthik Viswanathan ◽  
Justin Ghosh ◽  
Gerry C Kaye ◽  
John GF Cleland
Author(s):  
Ilaria Spoletini ◽  
Andrew Coats

It has been long acknowledged that electrical-conduction disturbances may be both a cause of heart failure and a consequence of it. In fact, many patients with heart failure have an asynchronous contraction pattern of the heart muscle that further reduces the heart ability to pump blood. Electrical disturbances may therefore result in progressive left ventricular dysfunction, due to the added effects of HF-related electrical dyssynchrony. For this reason, device therapy may play a key role in the management of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In particular, Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillators (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) may improve ejection fraction by reestablishing mechanical synchrony, possibly reversing symptoms and signs of heart failure, in addition to the more obvious role of ICD in terminating ventricular arrhythmias that threaten sudden death. Recommendations on device therapy from the current guidelines on heart failure management put out by the ESC/HFA in 2016 update our understanding of the evidence base for the use of ICD and CRT in HFrEF. We review these recommendations and the evidence behind them.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3482
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Ptaszyńska-Kopczyńska ◽  
Andrzej Eljaszewicz ◽  
Marta Marcinkiewicz-Siemion ◽  
Emilia Sawicka-Śmiarowska ◽  
Ewa Tarasiuk ◽  
...  

Background: The exact role of individual inflammatory factor in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains elusive. The study aimed to evaluate three monocyte subsets (classical-CD14++CD16−, intermediate-CD14++CD16+, and nonclassical-CD14+CD16++) in HFrEF patients and to assess the effect of the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the changes in monocyte compartment. Methods: The study included 85 patients with stable HFrEF. Twenty-five of them underwent CRT device implantation with subsequent 6-month assessment. The control group consisted of 23 volunteers without HFrEF. Results: The analysis revealed that frequencies of non-classical-CD14+CD16++ monocytes were lower in HFrEF patients compared to the control group (6.98 IQR: 4.95–8.65 vs. 8.37 IQR: 6.47–9.94; p = 0.021), while CD14++CD16+ and CD14++CD16− did not differ. The analysis effect of CRT on the frequency of analysed monocyte subsets 6 months after CRT device implantation showed a significant increase in CD14+CD16++ (from 7 IQR: 4.5–8.4 to 7.9 IQR: 6.5–9.5; p = 0.042) and CD14++CD16+ (from 5.1 IQR: 3.7–6.5 to 6.8 IQR: 5.4–7.4; p = 0.017) monocytes, while the frequency of steady-state CD14++CD16− monocytes was decreased (from 81.4 IQR: 78–86.2 to 78.2 IQR: 76.1–81.7; p = 0.003). Conclusions: HFrEF patients present altered monocyte composition. CRT-related changes in the monocyte compartment achieve levels observed in controls without HFrEF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document