scholarly journals Transbrachial approach as the first alternative to transradial approach for coronary angiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Lara Gudelj ◽  
Matias Trbušić
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Transbrachial Approach

Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography and Intervention—Ready for Prime Time?

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-84
Author(s):  
Olivier F Bertrand ◽  
Tift Mann ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Prime Time ◽  
Transradial Approach

scholarly journals Characteristics of the transRADIAL approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty in GREECE: the RADIAL-GREECE registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonios Ziakas ◽  
Matthaios Didagelos ◽  
Georgios Hahalis ◽  
Michael Koutouzis ◽  
Grigorios Tsigkas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Transradial Approach

scholarly journals Effect of Learning Curve in Transradial Approach to Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Saad Mahmood Zaidan ◽  
◽  
Ammar Zaidan Ammran ◽  
Zakariya Jubran Khaleel
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Percutaneous Intervention ◽  
Transradial Approach

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of kaolin-based hemostatic pad vs. standard mechanical compression following transradial and transulnar access for elective coronary angiography and PCI: RAUL trial substudy

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewandowski Pawel ◽  
Gralak-Lachowska Dagmara ◽  
Maciejewski Pawel ◽  
Ramotowski Bogumil ◽  
Budaj Andrzej ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Mechanical Compression ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Patient Pain ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Hemostatic devices used in the transradial approach (TRA) and transulnar approach (TUA) are limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of hemostasis using the QuikClot Radial hemostatic pad (QC) vs. standard mechanical compression (SC) after coronary angiography (CAG). This prospective single-center randomized trial included CAG patients. The primary and secondary endpoints were efficacy (successful hemostasis) and safety (total artery occlusion [TAO], pseudoaneurysm, hematoma), respectively. A visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated patient pain during compression. In 2013–2017, 200 patients were randomized 2 × 2 into the: (1) TRA and TUA groups and (2) QC and SC groups. Successful hemostasis was achieved in 92 (92%) patients in the QC group and 100 (100%) patients in the SC group (p < 0.006). The TRA SC subgroup showed significantly better results than the TRA QC subgroup (100% vs. 90.0%; p < 0.03). Similar results were obtained in the TUA QC and TUA SC subgroups (95% vs. 100%; p = 0.5). The secondary endpoint was achieved in the QC and SC groups (8% vs. 9%; p = 0.8). Patients reported significantly less pain during QC application than during SC (VAS: 2.6 ± 2.6 vs. 3.4 ± 2.9; p < 0.03). In patients undergoing CAG with TRA or TUA, QC was associated with lower efficacy, less discomfort, and similar safety compared to SC.

Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaim Lotan ◽  
Yonathan Hasin ◽  
Morris Mosseri ◽  
Yoseph Rozenman ◽  
Dan Admon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Transradial Approach

scholarly journals Vasospasms of the Radial Artery After the Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto Fukuda ◽  
Shin-ichiro Iwahara ◽  
Atsushi Harada ◽  
Shinya Yokoyama ◽  
Kouichi Akutsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Transradial Approach

From Femoral to Radial Approach in Coronary Intervention

Angiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renatomaria Bianchi ◽  
Ludovica D’Acierno ◽  
Mario Crisci ◽  
Donato Tartaglione ◽  
Maurizio Cappelli Bigazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Operator Experience ◽  
Transradial Access ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization

Since the first cardiac catheterization in 1929, this procedure has evolved considerably. Historically performed via the transfemoral access, in the last years, the transradial access has been spreading gradually due to its many advantages. We have conducted a review of published literature concerning efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, and we analyzed our patients’ data, including the results of the recently published Minimizing Adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX (MATRIX) study. This review confirmed the superiority of the transradial access compared to the femoral access, especially regarding complications related to the access site, duration of hospitalization, and comfort for the patient. The transradial approach is an excellent option for coronary angiography, and the procedure’s risks are reduced by increased operator experience.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document