scholarly journals Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction at mid-term follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Author(s):  
Katarina Cenkerova ◽  
Juraj Dubrava ◽  
Veronika Pokorna ◽  
Jozef Kaluzay ◽  
Olga Jurkovicova
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Prognostic value of nutritional status in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with and without atrial fibrillation: insights From PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kawasaki ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
T Watanabe ◽  
T Morita ◽  
Y Furukawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nutritional Indices ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Background Malnutrition is one of the most important comorbidities among heart failure (HF) patients, and serum cholinesterase (CHE) has been reported to be a prognostic factor in HF patients. On the other hand, atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, there is little information available on the prognostic value of nutritional status in HFpEF patients, with and without AF. We sought to clarify the prognostic value of CHE in HFpEF with and without AF and compare it with that of other nutrition indices such as gastric nutritional risk index (GNRI), controlling nutritional status (CONUT), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). Methods and results Patients data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study, which is a prospective multicenter observational registry for acute decompensated heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% in Osaka. We analyzed 380 patients (median age: 80 [75–87] years, male: 46%) after exclusion of patients with in-hospital death, missing follow-up data, or missing data to calculate nutritional indices. On admission, 155 patients had AF. Laboratory data were obtained at discharge. During a mean follow up period of 1.1±0.6 years, 131 patients had a composite endpoint (CE) of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cerebrovascular disorder. In multivariate Cox analysis, in patients with AF, CHE was significantly associated with CE independently of age, gender and body mass index after the adjustment with serum albumin, total cholesterol levels and total lymphocyte count, while it was not significantly associated with CE in patients without AF. C-index of CHE (0.708) was higher than that of GNRI (0.555, p=0.0028), CONUT (0.651, p=0.208) and PNI (0.635, p=0.208) in AF patients, while there were no significant differences in those nutritional indices in patients without AF. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that AF patients with lower CHE (<208 U/L = median value) had higher risk of CE than those with higher CHE (44% vs 18%, adjusted HR 3.26 95% CI [1.66–6.67], p=0.0005), while there was no significant difference in the occurrence rate of CE between patients with and without higher CHE in non-AF group (42% vs 31%, adjusted HR 1.28 95% CI [0.78–2.13], p=0.33). Conclusions Prognostic value of CHE would be stronger than other nutritional indices in HFpEF patients with AF, while it would be weak in HFpEF patients without AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Roche Diagnostics K.K.; Fuji Film Toyama Chemical Co. Ltd.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR<1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 13497: Prognostic Value of the Combination of the Echocardiographic Derived Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure and Body Mass Index in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumpei Ueda ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
Daisaku D Nakatani ◽  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Masamichi Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Wedge Pressure

Background: An elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), a surrogate of left ventricular filling pressure, is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). In addition, obesity paradox is well recognized in HF patients and body mass index (BMI) also provides a prognostic information. However, there is little information available on the prognostic value of the combination of the echocardiographic derived PAWP and BMI in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and Results: Patients data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study, which is a prospective multicenter observational registry for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients with HFpEF. We analyzed 548 patients after exclusion of patients undergoing hemodialysis, patients with in-hospital death, missing follow-up data, or missing data to calculate PAWP or BMI. Body weight measurement and echocardiography were performed just before discharge. PAWP was calculated using the Nagueh formula [PAWP = 1.24* (E/e’) + 1.9] with e’ = [(e’ septal + e’ lateral ) /2]. During a mean follow up period of 1.5±0.8 years, 86 patients had all-cause death (ACD). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that both PAWP (p=0.020) and BMI (p=0.0001) were significantly associated with ACD, independently of age and previous history of HF hospitalization, after the adjustment with gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, NT-proBNP and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in the risk of ACD when patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the median values of PAWP (17.3) and BMI (21.4). Conclusions: The combination of the echocardiographic derived PAWP and BMI might be useful for stratifying ADHF patients with HFpEF at risk for the total mortality.

Abstract 16894: Utilization of H2FPEF to Predict One-Year Mortality in Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Saith ◽  
anuragh trikha ◽  
Tamta Chkhikvadze ◽  
Ciril Khorolsky ◽  
June Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year

Background: The H2FPEF score is a validated scoring system to determine whether dyspnea may be due to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent evidence has suggested that H2FPEF scoring system may correlate with outcomes in established HFpEF. Its utilization for estimating mortality in patients who die within one year of discharge is not known. Methods: We collected clinical demographics and echocardiographic parameters from reports to calculate H2FPEF scores for 301 patients admitted with decompensated HFpEF between August 2016 and 2017. Patients were included if an echocardiographic report was available within 3 months, confirming an ejection fraction > 50%. E/E’ and filling pressures were scored as 0 if not recorded in the echocardiographic report. Results: Median age was 81 years (IQR: 71-89), with 62.9% female. One-year follow-up was confirmed for 268 patients, with 56 deaths (20.9%). Receiver operating curve analysis suggest borderline significance of H2FPEF in predicting one-year mortality (area under curve, 0.576, 95% CI: 0.493-0.658, p=0.073). Optimal H2FPEF cutpoint score was 4.5 (73% sensitivity, 50% specificity). On univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI) > 30, hypertension, atrial fibrillation (p<0.001) and pulmonary artery systemic pressure > 35 mmHg (p=0.038) were associated with one-year mortality. On stepwise logistic regression, only BMI > 30 and atrial fibrillation remained associated with mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The utilization of H2FPEF in established HFpEF might confer some ability to predict one-year mortality, driven by obesity (2 points) and atrial fibrillation (3 points). Validation in larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to establish its potential role in discharge planning and transitions of care of decompensated HFpEF.

Prognostic Value of Hyperuricemia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Kardiologiia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10_2015 ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
M.S. Dzeshka Dzeshka ◽  
V.A. Snezhitskiy Snezhitskiy ◽  
G.A. Madekina Madekina ◽  
I.A. Dolnik Dolnik ◽  
O.V. Panasiuk Panasiuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Zolotarova ◽  
M Brynza ◽  
O Bilchenko
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Control Strategy ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (HFrEF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation reduces hospitalization and mortality due to HF compared to medical therapy (MT). However, only few studies have examined outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for AF in HF patients with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (HFpEF).  Purpose. To compare the effect of catheter ablation on the outcomes of atrial fibrillation with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods. Our prospective study included the main group (136 patients with the HFpEF who underwent a single procedure of the CA for symptomatic AF) and control group (58 patients with the HFpEF patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF on MT for rhythm and rate control strategy). To be eligible for inclusion for both groups, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction had to be present and/or relevant structural heart disease according to the current guidelines had to be fulfilled within 6 months prior to AF ablation. Outpatient follow-up were performed at 6, 12, 24 months intervals thereafter baseline.  Results. At the follow-up the composite primary end point (all-cause death or worsening of HF that led to an unplanned hospitalization) appeared in significantly fewer patients in the CA group than in the MT group (18 (13,2%) patients vs. 16 (27,5%) patients; p =0,005). The secondary analyses showed there was 5 deaths in the CA group and 2 deaths in MT group, with rate of 3,7%  and 3,4% respectively that were equal in comparable groups (p = 0,362). The incidences of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization were also significantly higher in MT group than in CA group (14 (24,1%) vs. 13 (9,6%), p = 0,005) vs. 21 (15,4%), p = 0,016, respectively). Cardiovascular death and cerebrovascular accident were equal in comparable groups. The Kaplan–Meier curve for primary end-point demonstrated significant higher survival and freedom from hospitalizations due to HF in the CA group compared to MT group (p = 0,005); the freedom from hospitalization for worsening HF and the freedom from the cardiovascular hospitalization were having higher probability in the СA group (p = 0,003 and p= 0,016 ). Conclusion. Comparing catheter ablation with medical therapy for rhythm or rate control strategy in patients with heart failure with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation, we found that catheter ablation was associated with lower rate of deaths and hospitalization due to worsening of heart failure.

Independent and incremental prognostic value of semiquantitative measures of tricuspid regurgitation severity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonari Harada ◽  
Masaru Obokata ◽  
Kazunori Omote ◽  
Hiroyuki Iwano ◽  
Takahiro Ikoma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Vena Contracta ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Incremental Prognostic Value

Abstract Aims This study sought to determine the independent and incremental prognostic value of semiquantitative measures of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity over right heart remodelling and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results Echocardiography was performed on 311 HFpEF patients. TR severity was defined by the semiquantitative measures [i.e. vena contracta width (VCW) and jet area] and by the guideline-based integrated qualitative approach (absent, mild, moderate, or severe). All-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 101 patients over a 2.1-year median follow-up. There was a continuous association between TR severity and the composite outcome with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17 per 1 mm increase of VCW [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.26, P &lt; 0.0001]. Compared with patients with the lowest VCW category (≤1 mm), RV-adjusted HRs for the outcome were 1.99 (95% CI 1.05–3.77), 2.63 (95% CI 1.16–5.95), and 5.00 (95% CI 1.60–15.7) for 1–3, 3–7, and ≥7 mm VCW categories, respectively. TR severity as defined by the guideline-based approach showed a similarly graded association, but it was no longer significant in models including PH. In contrast, VCW remained independently and incrementally associated with the outcome after adjusting for established prognostic factors, as well as RV diameter and PH (fully adjusted HR 1.14 per 1 mm, 95% CI 1.02–1.27, P = 0.02; χ2 58.8 vs. 51.5, P = 0.03). Conclusion The current data highlight the potential value of the semiquantitative measures of TR severity for the risk stratification in patients with HFpEF.

scholarly journals Signs of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in atrial fibrillation patients normalise in many patients after restoration of sinus rhythm

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C.P Wagemakers ◽  
R Wesselink ◽  
J Neefs ◽  
A Kougioumtzoglou ◽  
N.W.E Van Den Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Af Recurrence

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) coexist in many patients. AF and HFpEF are closely intertwined, but there are important knowledge gaps in the pathogenesis, risk, prevention and treatment of AF with concomitant HFpEF, in particular with respect to reversal of HFpEF signs. Purpose To assess the proportion of AF patients with (any) HFpEF criteria (including patients with heart failure with moderately reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF)) who – after successful AF ablation – no longer meet the criteria for HFpEF on neurohumoral and echocardiographic level. Furthermore, to assess whether normalisation of HFpEF criteria positively affects AF recurrence. Methods Patients (n=526) underwent thoracoscopic AF ablation, consisting of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone or PVI with additional lines in the case of persistent AF and were prospectively followed-up. Patients (n=338) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% and a successful ablation at 6 months follow-up, that is freedom of AF, or any atrial tachycardia of more than 30 seconds, were included in this study. Participants were grouped based on N-terminal pro-b type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) into those with a NT-proBNP &lt;125pg/ml, defined as control patients (group 1), and those with a NT-proBNP level ≥125pg/ml, defined as HFpEF patients (group 2). HFpEF patients were further classified in different degrees of HFpEF severity, based on the number of diagnostic echocardiographic criteria for diastolic dysfunction present into possible HFpEF (group 2a, &lt;2 criteria), likely HFpEF (group 2b, 2 criteria) and definite HFpEF (2c, ≥3 criteria). The primary outcome was the change in HFpEF defining signs on neurohumoral (NT-proBNP) level and echocardiographic (number of echocardiographic criteria for diastolic dysfunction) level 6 months after restoration of sinus rhythm. Results In total, 69% of AF patients (with a preserved ejection fraction of ≥40%) fulfilled the criteria for HFpEF. In 23% of these patients, neurohumoral levels normalised after elimination of AF, and a normalisation of echocardiographic markers was seen in 58% of patients. Normalisation of HFpEF on a neurohumoral level was associated with numerically fewer AF recurrence at 1 year follow-up (23% versus 33% in patients with and without NT-proBNP &lt;125 pg/ml respectively, p=0.212). This favourable outcome was not observed in patients with a normalisation of echocardiographic markers. Conclusion In AF patients with definite restoration of sinus rhythm HFpEF may be reversed. This suggests that neurohumoral and echographic changes are caused by AF rather than by HFpEF. Normalisation of neurohumoral changes after definite restoration of sinus rhythm led to better outcome with regards to AF-recurrence, which could be used in prediction of prognosis. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Do Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction Have Heart Failure at Follow-Up: Implications of the Framingham Criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-684
Author(s):  
CAMILLA HAGE ◽  
ULRIKA LÖFSTRÖM ◽  
ERWAN DONAL ◽  
EMMANUEL OGER ◽  
AGNIESZKA KAPŁON-CIEŚLICKA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document