scholarly journals Life Satisfaction in Division IAA and Division III Football Players

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista Francisco
2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1284-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Miller ◽  
Gregory J. Adamson ◽  
Marilyn M. Pink ◽  
John C. Sweet

Background College football players sustain an average of 3 subconcussive blows to the head per game. Concussions correlate with decreases in standardized neurocognitive test scores. It is not known whether repetitive, subconcussive microtrauma associated with participation in a full season of collision sport affects neurocognitive test scores. Hypothesis No difference exists between preseason, midseason, and postseason Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) scores when collegiate football players sustain subconcussive microtrauma from forceful, repetitive contact activity. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Fifty-eight members of a Division III collegiate football team who had no known concussion during the season voluntarily completed the SAC and ImPACT instruments preseason, midseason, and postseason. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the scores at the 3 time intervals (P < .05). Results No statistically significant decreases were found in overall SAC or ImPACT scores or in any of the domains or composites of the tests (P < .05) when preseason, midseason, and postseason scores were evaluated. Conclusions ImPACT and SAC neurocognitive test scores are not significantly altered by a season of repetitive contact in collegiate football athletes who have not sustained a concussion. Clinical Relevance A diminution in SAC or ImPACT scores in concert with clinical symptoms and findings should be interpreted as evidence of a postconcussive event.


2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Abbey ◽  
Christina M. Kirkpatrick ◽  
Cynthia J. Wright

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 862-863
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. DeFrang ◽  
Wendy ES Repovich ◽  
Janet T. Peterson

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay R Hoffman ◽  
Nicholas A Ratamess ◽  
Marc Klatt ◽  
Avery D Faigenbaum ◽  
Ryan E Ross ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah L. Feairheller ◽  
Kristin R. Aichele ◽  
Joyann E. Oakman ◽  
Michael P. Neal ◽  
Christina M. Cromwell ◽  
...  

Studies report that football players have high blood pressure (BP) and increased cardiovascular risk. There are over 70,000 NCAA football players and 450 Division III schools sponsor football programs, yet limited research exists on vascular health of athletes. This study aimed to compare vascular and cardiovascular health measures between football players and nonathlete controls. Twenty-three athletes and 19 nonathletes participated. Vascular health measures included flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). Cardiovascular measures included clinic and 24 hr BP levels, body composition,VO2 max, and fasting glucose/cholesterol levels. Compared to controls, football players had a worse vascular and cardiovascular profile. Football players had thicker carotid artery IMT (0.49 ± 0.06 mm versus 0.46 ± 0.07 mm) and larger brachial artery diameter during FMD (4.3±0.5 mm versus3.7±0.6 mm), but no difference in percent FMD. Systolic BP was significantly higher in football players at all measurements: resting (128.2±6.4 mmHg versus122.4±6.8 mmHg), submaximal exercise (150.4±18.8 mmHg versus137.3±9.5 mmHg), maximal exercise (211.3±25.9 mmHg versus191.4±19.2 mmHg), and 24-hour BP (124.9±6.3 mmHg versus109.8±3.7 mmHg). Football players also had higher fasting glucose (91.6±6.5 mg/dL versus86.6±5.8 mg/dL), lower HDL (36.5±11.2 mg/dL versus47.1±14.8 mg/dL), and higher body fat percentage (29.2±7.9% versus23.2±7.0%). Division III collegiate football players remain an understudied population and may be at increased cardiovascular risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document