Data From: Historical Changes in Lower Columbia River and Estuary Floods: A Numerical Study

Author(s):  
Lumas Helaire ◽  
David Jay ◽  
Stefan Talke ◽  
Andrew Mahedy
2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 7926-7946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lumas T. Helaire ◽  
Stefan A. Talke ◽  
David A. Jay ◽  
Drew Mahedy

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Gelfenbaum ◽  
Jamie MacMahan ◽  
Ad Reniers

1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 299-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R Sherwood ◽  
David A Jay ◽  
R Bradford Harvey ◽  
Peter Hamilton ◽  
Charles A Simenstad

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1478-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. McIntosh ◽  
James R. Sedell ◽  
Russell F. Thurow ◽  
Sharon E. Clarke ◽  
Gwynn L. Chandler

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1846-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex E. Peden ◽  
Grant W. Hughes

Four species of Rhinichthys (R. cataractae, R. falcatus, R. osculus, and R. umatilla) are recognized in Canadian sections of the Columbia River, with sympatry occuring between all species except R. falcatus and R. osculus. Species status of the latter is supported by morphological dissimilarity between it and the morphologically similar R. falcatus and R. umatilla. Populations of R. umatilla from the Similkameen, Kettle, and Columbia (including Kootenay and Slocan) rivers have morphological and pigmentary differences, but are identifiable with R. umatilla of the lower Columbia River. Canadian R. osculus are similar to historically known populations near the Colville and Little Spokane rivers of northeastern Washington. Populations from more distant tributaries of the Columbia system are variable in morphology and habitat and require separate study to determine their relationships to Canadian populations. Rhinichthys osculus was apparently replaced by R. umatilla in the Colville River, an event that may have been correlated with historical changes of water quality or flooding by the Roosevelt Reservoir. Because R. umatilla prefers swift clear portions of large rivers, it is potentially in conflict with hydroelectric projects. Though not immediately threatened, the status of this species in Canada should be monitored in connection with future development of river systems.


1998 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sampoli, P. Benassi, R. Dell'Anna,

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document