scholarly journals Three Stages of Evolution in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Stroke Unit Care, Intravenous Thrombolysis and Endovascular Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Chen ◽  
SF Zhang ◽  
ML Liu ◽  
CC Ren
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Stroke Unit Care

scholarly journals Acute Ischemic Stroke in Late Pregnancy Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis and Endovascular Therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Szuchy Kristiansen ◽  
Hannah Holm Vestergaard ◽  
Boris Modrau ◽  
Lorenz Martin Oppel
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Exclusion Criterion ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
In Pregnancy

Pregnancy has usually been an exclusion criterion in clinical trials with thrombolysis and endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. For that reason, these therapies are not recommended causing lack of evidence and vice versa. In this case report, we describe a pregnant woman in week 33 + 3 presenting with acute ischemic stroke, which was successfully treated with systemic thrombolysis and endovascular therapy, resulting in a good clinical outcome for both mother and child. The altered fibrinolytic system and the risk factors related to pregnancy constitute a challenge for clinicians when choosing the most suitable treatment modality for treating acute ischemic stroke in pregnancy. It is still uncertain whether thrombolysis in combination with endovascular therapy or endovascular therapy alone is the most appropriate treatment option. However, there is slowly growing evidence that thrombolysis and thrombectomy in pregnancy are feasible and safe with a good clinical outcome for both the mother and the child.

scholarly journals Endovascular stroke intervention in young patients with large vessel occlusions

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
Stavropoula Tjoumakaris ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
David Hasan ◽  
Nimrita Sidhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Endovascular Intervention ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Arterial Recanalization ◽  
The Mean

Object Endovascular therapy has become a widely used method for achieving arterial recanalization in patients who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis or those in whom it is unsuccessful. Young stroke patients with large vessel occlusions may particularly benefit from endovascular intervention. This study aims to assess the authors' experience with the use of modern endovascular techniques to treat young patients (≤ 55 years old) with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusions. Methods Young patients (≤ 55 years old) undergoing endovascular intervention for acute ischemic stroke at the authors' institution were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Only those patients with a confirmed large vessel occlusion were included. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were determined at 90 days during a follow-up visit. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of outcome (mRS score 0–2). Results A total of 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients in this series was 45 ± 9.6 years. The mean admission NIH Stroke Scale score was 14.1 ± 5 (median 13.5). Mechanical thrombectomy was performed using the Solitaire FR device in 13 (29%) patients and the Merci/Penumbra systems in 32 (71%) patients. The rate of successful recanalization (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] scale Grade II–III) was 93% (42/45). Only 1 patient (2.2%) had a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following intervention. One patient (2.2%) sustained a vessel perforation intraoperatively. The rate of 90-day favorable outcome (mRS score 0–2) was 77.5% and the rate of 90-day satisfactory outcome (mRS score 0–3) was 90%. The 90-day mortality rate was 7.5%. In multivariate analysis, postprocedure TIMI grade was the only statistically significant independent predictor of 90-day outcome (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.01–1.19; p = 0.05). Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that endovascular therapy provides remarkably high rates of arterial recanalization and favorable outcomes in young patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusions. These findings support aggressive interventional strategies in these patients. Randomized, controlled trials reflecting modern acute ischemic stroke treatment will be needed to confirm the findings of this study.

scholarly journals TRIAGE-STROKE: Treatment strategy In Acute larGE vessel occlusion: Prioritize IV or endovascular treatment—A randomized trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Behrndtz ◽  
Søren P Johnsen ◽  
Jan B Valentin ◽  
Martin F Gude ◽  
Rolf A Blauenfeldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Rationale For patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusions, intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy are standard of care, but the effect of endovascular therapy is superior to intravenous thrombolysis. If a severe stroke with symptoms indicating large vessel occlusions occurs in the catchment area of a primary stroke center, there is equipoise regarding optimal transport strategy. Aim For patients presenting with suspected large vessel occlusions (PASS ≥ 2) and a final diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, we hypothesize that bypassing the primary stroke center will result in an improved 90-day functional outcome. Sample size We aim to randomize 600 patients, 1:1. Design A national investigator-driven, multi-center, randomized assessor-blinded clinical trial. The Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale has been developed. It identifies most patients with large vessel occlusions in the pre-hospital setting. Patients without a contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis are randomized to either transport directly to a comprehensive stroke centers for intravenous thrombolysis and of endovascular therapy or to a primary stroke center for intravenous thrombolysis and subsequent transport to a comprehensive stroke centers for of endovascular therapy, if needed. Outcomes The primary outcome will be the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) for all patients with acute ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes include 90-day mRS for all randomized patients, all patients with ischemic stroke but without large vessel occlusions, and patients with hemorrhagic stroke. The safety outcomes include severe dependency or death and time to intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke patients. Discussion Study results will influence decision making regarding transport strategy for patients with suspected large vessel occlusions.

scholarly journals Ultraearly Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Mobile Stroke Unit and Hospital Settings

Stroke ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1996-1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Frederik Geisler ◽  
Aristeidis H. Katsanos ◽  
Janika Kõrv ◽  
Alexander Kunz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Mobile Stroke Unit

scholarly journals Disentangling Sex Differences in Use of Reperfusion Therapy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2332-2338
Author(s):  
Jeppe Mainz ◽  
Grethe Andersen ◽  
Jan Brink Valentin ◽  
Martin Faurholdt Gude ◽  
Søren Paaske Johnsen
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Time Delay ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy

Background and Purpose: Previous studies from local settings have reported that women with acute ischemic stroke have a lower chance of receiving reperfusion therapy treatment, including intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy, than men, but the underlying mechanisms of this disparity have not been identified. We aimed to examine sex differences in the utilization of reperfusion therapy focusing on all the phases of pre- and in-hospital time delay in a nationwide population-based cohort. Methods: This study was based on data from nationwide public registries. The study population included patients aged at least 18 years admitted with acute ischemic stroke using emergency medical services in Denmark dispatched after an emergency call in the period 2016 to 2017. Study outcomes included time delays from symptom onset to start of reperfusion therapy and use of reperfusion therapy. Data were analyzed using multivariable quantile regression and logistic regression. Results: A total of 5356 stroke events fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Women (26.6%) were less likely to receive intravenous thrombolysis than men (30.2 %), corresponding to an unadjusted odds ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74–0.95). In addition, women experienced a 20 minutes longer median time delay from stroke symptom onset to stroke unit arrival than men. Adjusting for onset-to-door time only appeared to have a limited effect on the sex differences in use of intravenous thrombolysis, whereas the odds ratio was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.93–1.21) when adjusting for age at stroke, stroke severity, and cohabitation status. No sex difference was observed for the use of thrombectomy. Conclusions: Women received less reperfusion therapy than men and had a longer time delay from symptom onset to stroke unit arrival, primarily due to a longer delay from symptom onset to emergency medical services call. These differences appeared to be due to the higher age and the higher proportion of women living alone at the time of the stroke.

Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients Receiving Endovascular Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Kyun Park ◽  
Jong-Won Chung ◽  
Jeong-Ho Hong ◽  
Min Uk Jang ◽  
Hyun-Du Noh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
New Generation

Background: The beneficial effects of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke have been demonstrated in recent clinical trials using new-generation thrombectomy devices. However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of preceding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in this population has rarely been evaluated. Methods: From a prospective multicenter stroke registry database in Korea, we identified patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with EVT within 8 h of onset and admitted to 14 participating centers during 2008-2013. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months. Major secondary outcomes were successful recanalization defined as a modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia score of 2b-3, functional independence (mRS score 0-2), mortality at 3 months, and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (SHT) during hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analyses using generalized linear mixed models were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of preceding IVT. Results: Of the 639 patients (male, 61%; age 69 ± 12; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 15 [11-19]) who met the eligibility criteria, 458 received preceding IVT. These patients showed lower mRS scores (adjusted common OR, 1.38 [95% CI 0.98-1.96]). Preceding IVT was associated with successful recanalization (1.96 [1.23-3.11]) and reduced 3-month mortality (0.58 [0.35-0.97]) but not with SHT (0.96 [0.48-1.93]). Conclusion: In patients treated with EVT within 8 of acute ischemic stroke onset, preceding IVT may enhance survival and successful recanalization without additional risk of SHT, and mitigate disability at 3 months.

P-005 Is bridging with intravenous thrombolysis of any benefit in endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke?

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A17-A17
Author(s):  
T. Kass-Hout ◽  
M. Mokin ◽  
O. Kass-Hout ◽  
M. Darkhabani ◽  
D. Orion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document