Chosun Literature Salon in 1940 –The journalism planning of Foreign Literature Group appearing in 「The First Comprehensive Discussion of Art」–

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 65-98
Author(s):  
Seung-Jun Park
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Literature ◽  
Literature Group ◽  
Comprehensive Discussion

The possibility of reducing the risk of developing preeclampsia (review of foreign literature)

GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
S.A. Levakov ◽  
◽  
E.I. Borovkova ◽  
N.A. Sheshukova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Literature

COST THINKING IN THE PROCESS OF ENTERPRISE VALUE MANAGEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
B. I. SHEVCHENKO ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Value Management ◽  
Enterprise Value ◽  
Foreign Literature ◽  
Methodological Approaches

The article explores the concept of cost thinking based on methodological approaches developed in the domestic and foreign literature; the process of enterprise value management is analyzed in the article.

Pre-Insolvency Proceedings

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolaes Tollenaar
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Class Composition ◽  
Normative Foundation ◽  
The Us ◽  
Insolvency Proceedings ◽  
Comprehensive Discussion

This book develops a normative foundation and framework for pre-insolvency proceedings. The book features a comprehensive discussion of the key principles underlying restructuring proceedings and explains the purpose of, and justification for, pre-insolvency proceedings. It deals with all-important issues such as class composition, cross-class cramdown, and valuation. A comparative analysis and critique of UK schemes of arrangement and the US Chapter 11 procedure is also included, identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each.

scholarly journals The Ælfrician Glossaries in Oxford, Bodleian Library, Barlow 35: A New Edition and Commentary

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-233
Author(s):  
Claudio Cataldi
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
Twelfth Century ◽  
Bodleian Library ◽  
The Third ◽  
Plant Names ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Comprehensive Discussion

AbstractThe present study provides a full edition and commentary of the three glossaries in Oxford, Bodleian Library, Barlow 35, fol. 57r–v. These glossaries, which were first partly edited and discussed by Liebermann (1894), are comprised of excerpts from Ælfric’s Grammar and Glossary arranged by subject. The selection of material from the two Ælfrician works witnesses to the interests of the glossator. The first glossary in Barlow 35 collects Latin grammatical terms and verbs followed by their Old English equivalents. The second glossary is drawn from the chapter on plant names of Ælfric’s Glossary, with interpolations from other chapters of the same work. This glossary also features twelfth-century interlinear notations, which seem to have a metatextual function. The third glossary combines excerpts from Ælfric’s Glossary with verbs derived from the Grammar. Liebermann transcribed only part of the glosses and gave a brief commentary on the glossaries as well as parallels with Zupitza’s (1880) edition of Ælfric’s Grammar and Glossary; hence the need for a new edition, which is provided in the present study, along with a comprehensive discussion of the glossaries and a reassessment of the correspondences concerning their Ælfrician sources.

Observers in analytic groups: A content analysis study from the participant perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 053331642110076
Author(s):  
Christian Peter Endler ◽  
Angelika Enzian ◽  
Günter Dietrich ◽  
Stefan Schacht ◽  
Gabriele Sachs
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Group Leader ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Survey And Evaluation ◽  
Literature Group ◽  
Almost All

What perceptions do group participants have about silent observers, what transferences are involved, what function can the listeners have for the group? In an anonymous survey and evaluation based on content analysis, almost all participants reported positive, and two thirds also negative impressions and perceptions. Observers were perceived as being familiar or supportive and as threatening or constraining to an approximately equal extent. There was no outright demonization or perception of a divide between the group leader(s) and the observers, as described in the older literature. Group participants also appear to perceive observers as representatives of their own superego, which are ‘silenced’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document