Complexity of Mathematics Education Reform : Learnings from US Math Curriculum Reform History

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-154
Author(s):  
노선숙
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung Tran ◽  
Barbara J. Reys ◽  
Dawn Teuscher ◽  
Shannon Dingman ◽  
Lisa Kasmer

This commentary highlights the contribution that careful and systematic analyses of curriculum or content standards can make to questions and issues important in the mathematics education field. We note the increased role that curriculum standards have played as part of a standards-based education reform strategy. We also review different methods used by researchers to compare and analyze the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, each method designed for a particular purpose. Finally, we call upon mathematics education researchers to engage in careful analysis of curriculum standards and to share their findings in ways that can inform public debate as well as support education professionals in improving student learning opportunities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 638-640 ◽  
pp. 2393-2396
Author(s):  
Li Ya Fan ◽  
Xue Qiang Wang

This paper based on the best architecture universities education concept, through the analysis of the architecture education mode, put forward the current architectural education reform and development directions. From the perspective of curriculum practice, probes into the new mode of curriculum and education, enhance the comprehensive ability and creative thinking of students; Reference to CRIT rating chart patterns, join in the concept of "workshop", Create local and broader academic building information platform, provides the domestic architectural education improvement ideas.


1996 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernand J. Prevost

A new view of teaching is emerging from the work of the constructivists and mathematics education reform leaders. In particular, we examine here four aspects of teaching that must change: task selection, guidance of classroom discourse, setting the learning environment, and the analysis of teaching and learning. Several national curriculum projects are working to effect these changes and examples of their work are provided. This work has motivated individual teachers to similarly design investigations that engage students in the study of significant mathematics, and two examples are included. Assessment must also change and students must learn to become less dependent on “authority” for the correctness of answers. Finally, our present understanding of constructivism and its implications for teaching/learning must not be static; though that view now may be at the center, we must listen to those who are on the edges and expect to be changed again and again in the years ahead.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document